预测警察安全带的使用:基于证据的解决方案,以提高警察驾驶安全

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Police Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-05-18 DOI:10.1177/1098611120923159
Scott E. Wolfe, S. Lawson, Jeff Rojek, G. Alpert
{"title":"预测警察安全带的使用:基于证据的解决方案,以提高警察驾驶安全","authors":"Scott E. Wolfe, S. Lawson, Jeff Rojek, G. Alpert","doi":"10.1177/1098611120923159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the hidden dangers of police work is self-imposed—the failure to wear seat belts. Unfortunately, little evidence exists concerning the factors that account for why officers do not wear their seat belts. This study used a sample of 450 police officers to develop and test a framework for understanding the predictors of seat belt use. We found several factors that were associated with the frequency of officer seat belt use: the perceived likelihood of supervisors enforcing seat belt and other driving policies, organizational justice, having a departmental colleague previously struck by a vehicle, law enforcement experience, risky driving attitudes, number of prior on-duty collisions, being a patrol officer versus supervisor, and perceived risk of being involved in a vehicle collision. We discuss the practical implications of these findings as they apply to efforts aimed at improving officer driving safety and subsequent reduction in related injuries and deaths.","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"472 - 499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1098611120923159","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Police Officer Seat Belt Use: Evidence-Based Solutions to Improve Officer Driving Safety\",\"authors\":\"Scott E. Wolfe, S. Lawson, Jeff Rojek, G. Alpert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1098611120923159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the hidden dangers of police work is self-imposed—the failure to wear seat belts. Unfortunately, little evidence exists concerning the factors that account for why officers do not wear their seat belts. This study used a sample of 450 police officers to develop and test a framework for understanding the predictors of seat belt use. We found several factors that were associated with the frequency of officer seat belt use: the perceived likelihood of supervisors enforcing seat belt and other driving policies, organizational justice, having a departmental colleague previously struck by a vehicle, law enforcement experience, risky driving attitudes, number of prior on-duty collisions, being a patrol officer versus supervisor, and perceived risk of being involved in a vehicle collision. We discuss the practical implications of these findings as they apply to efforts aimed at improving officer driving safety and subsequent reduction in related injuries and deaths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Police Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"472 - 499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1098611120923159\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Police Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120923159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120923159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

警察工作的隐患之一是自我强加的——不系安全带。不幸的是,几乎没有证据表明警察不系安全带的原因。这项研究使用了450名警察的样本来开发和测试一个框架,以了解安全带使用的预测因素。我们发现了与官员安全带使用频率相关的几个因素:监管人员执行安全带和其他驾驶政策的可能性、组织公正性、部门同事之前被车撞过、执法经验、危险驾驶态度、之前值班碰撞的次数、巡逻官与监管人员的关系、,以及被卷入车辆碰撞的感知风险。我们讨论了这些发现的实际意义,因为它们适用于旨在提高警官驾驶安全和随后减少相关伤亡的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Police Officer Seat Belt Use: Evidence-Based Solutions to Improve Officer Driving Safety
One of the hidden dangers of police work is self-imposed—the failure to wear seat belts. Unfortunately, little evidence exists concerning the factors that account for why officers do not wear their seat belts. This study used a sample of 450 police officers to develop and test a framework for understanding the predictors of seat belt use. We found several factors that were associated with the frequency of officer seat belt use: the perceived likelihood of supervisors enforcing seat belt and other driving policies, organizational justice, having a departmental colleague previously struck by a vehicle, law enforcement experience, risky driving attitudes, number of prior on-duty collisions, being a patrol officer versus supervisor, and perceived risk of being involved in a vehicle collision. We discuss the practical implications of these findings as they apply to efforts aimed at improving officer driving safety and subsequent reduction in related injuries and deaths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
期刊最新文献
Factors Promoting and Inhibiting Use of Wellness Resources Among Police: A Mixed Methods Study Law Enforcement-Based Outreach and Treatment Referral as a Response to Opioid Misuse: Assessing Reductions in Overdoses and Costs The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis Sergeant Coffee Needs You: Evaluation of a Police Officer Bystander Intervention Program An Examination of Unintentional Use of Force by the Police
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1