改变对你有好处:持续的环境改善重要吗?

IF 4.2 4区 管理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Organization & Environment Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI:10.1177/10860266221107648
T. Busch, Matthew P. Johnson, Maximilian Schnippering
{"title":"改变对你有好处:持续的环境改善重要吗?","authors":"T. Busch, Matthew P. Johnson, Maximilian Schnippering","doi":"10.1177/10860266221107648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Superior corporate environmental performance (CEP) is considered to be an indication of well-managed firms. While previous empirical research has operationalized various environmental measurements, one aspect has remained under-scrutinized, namely, continuous improvement. We examine whether continuous CEP improvement is reflected in aggregated environmental scores provided by sustainability rating agencies. From a natural resource-based view, we investigate the association of continuous CEP improvement with corporate financial performance (CFP). Based on panel data (2005–2020), the results show that continuous CEP improvement is not associated with aggregated environmental scores provided by three major rating agencies. At the same time, however, continuous improvement is positively associated with accounting as well as market-based CFP. The article concludes that continuous CEP improvement is relevant from a materiality perspective, but it is not adequately captured in the environmental scores from rating agencies. Therefore, we propose using a best-in-progress approach as a meaningful investment strategy instead of the established best-in-class screenings.","PeriodicalId":47984,"journal":{"name":"Organization & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Change Will Do You Good: Does Continuous Environmental Improvement Matter?\",\"authors\":\"T. Busch, Matthew P. Johnson, Maximilian Schnippering\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10860266221107648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Superior corporate environmental performance (CEP) is considered to be an indication of well-managed firms. While previous empirical research has operationalized various environmental measurements, one aspect has remained under-scrutinized, namely, continuous improvement. We examine whether continuous CEP improvement is reflected in aggregated environmental scores provided by sustainability rating agencies. From a natural resource-based view, we investigate the association of continuous CEP improvement with corporate financial performance (CFP). Based on panel data (2005–2020), the results show that continuous CEP improvement is not associated with aggregated environmental scores provided by three major rating agencies. At the same time, however, continuous improvement is positively associated with accounting as well as market-based CFP. The article concludes that continuous CEP improvement is relevant from a materiality perspective, but it is not adequately captured in the environmental scores from rating agencies. Therefore, we propose using a best-in-progress approach as a meaningful investment strategy instead of the established best-in-class screenings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization & Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221107648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221107648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优秀的企业环境绩效(CEP)被认为是管理良好的企业的标志。虽然以前的实证研究已采用了各种环境测量方法,但有一个方面仍未得到充分审查,即持续改进。我们研究持续的CEP改善是否反映在可持续性评级机构提供的综合环境得分中。从自然资源为基础的观点,我们研究了持续的CEP改善与企业财务绩效(CFP)的关系。基于面板数据(2005-2020),结果表明,持续的CEP改善与三大评级机构提供的综合环境得分无关。然而,与此同时,持续改善与会计以及基于市场的CFP呈正相关。文章的结论是,从重要性的角度来看,持续的CEP改进是相关的,但评级机构的环境评分并没有充分体现这一点。因此,我们建议使用最佳进展方法作为一种有意义的投资策略,而不是既定的同类最佳筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Change Will Do You Good: Does Continuous Environmental Improvement Matter?
Superior corporate environmental performance (CEP) is considered to be an indication of well-managed firms. While previous empirical research has operationalized various environmental measurements, one aspect has remained under-scrutinized, namely, continuous improvement. We examine whether continuous CEP improvement is reflected in aggregated environmental scores provided by sustainability rating agencies. From a natural resource-based view, we investigate the association of continuous CEP improvement with corporate financial performance (CFP). Based on panel data (2005–2020), the results show that continuous CEP improvement is not associated with aggregated environmental scores provided by three major rating agencies. At the same time, however, continuous improvement is positively associated with accounting as well as market-based CFP. The article concludes that continuous CEP improvement is relevant from a materiality perspective, but it is not adequately captured in the environmental scores from rating agencies. Therefore, we propose using a best-in-progress approach as a meaningful investment strategy instead of the established best-in-class screenings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Organization & Environment encourages informed discussion about the social roots and consequences of environmental problems and stimulates deeper reflection on the meaning and significance of the natural world. By critically examining the impact of human production and consumption systems on the natural environment, Organization & Environment develops new perspectives on organizations that encourage environmentally sensitive reflection, inquiry, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Overdependence on Supply Chain Partners, Exploitation, and Willingness to Focus on Sustainability Performance in Business-to-Business Firms Too Afraid to Act? How CEO Political Ideological Divergence Influences Environmental Innovation Indigenous People Struggle for Damage Repair: Assessing Shadow Networks Resistance and Pursuit of Resilience in the Context of an Industrial Disaster Examining the Effects of Green Human Resource Management Practices, Green Psychological Climate, and Organizational Pride on Employees’ Voluntary Pro-Environmental Behavior Toward an Ecological Resource Orchestration Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1