校长们对挪威实施免费中学的看法:理由、挑战和机遇

A. Gillespie, Tony Burner
{"title":"校长们对挪威实施免费中学的看法:理由、挑战和机遇","authors":"A. Gillespie, Tony Burner","doi":"10.23865/up.v13.1969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on four principals’ views on the implementation of so-called grade-free middle schools, i.e. schools that drop all grades on students’ performances except the two required by the national assessment regulation, as part of their work with Assessment for Learning (AfL). More specifically, we were interested in the under-researched area of how principals justify introducing and implementing grade-free schools, and what their experiences are regarding challenges and opportunities that have arisen during and as a result of the implementation. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to collect data. Findings suggest that principals rely on research and unsatisfying assessment practices when justifying a change to grade-free schools. However, they do not find the involvement of students, nor the information directed at parents about the implementation, to be sufficient. They also mention challenges related to the current assessment system, which they believe underpin a behavioristic understanding of learning. The article calls for more research on trust among various stakeholders and student involvement when implementing grade-free schools.","PeriodicalId":33455,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principals’ views on the implementation of grade-free middle schools in Norway: justifications, challenges and opportunities\",\"authors\":\"A. Gillespie, Tony Burner\",\"doi\":\"10.23865/up.v13.1969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reports on four principals’ views on the implementation of so-called grade-free middle schools, i.e. schools that drop all grades on students’ performances except the two required by the national assessment regulation, as part of their work with Assessment for Learning (AfL). More specifically, we were interested in the under-researched area of how principals justify introducing and implementing grade-free schools, and what their experiences are regarding challenges and opportunities that have arisen during and as a result of the implementation. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to collect data. Findings suggest that principals rely on research and unsatisfying assessment practices when justifying a change to grade-free schools. However, they do not find the involvement of students, nor the information directed at parents about the implementation, to be sufficient. They also mention challenges related to the current assessment system, which they believe underpin a behavioristic understanding of learning. The article calls for more research on trust among various stakeholders and student involvement when implementing grade-free schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23865/up.v13.1969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/up.v13.1969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章报道了四位校长对实施所谓的无年级中学的看法,即除了国家评估条例要求的两所学校外,学校会根据学生的表现降低所有成绩,这是他们与学习评估(AfL)合作的一部分。更具体地说,我们感兴趣的是研究不足的领域,即校长们如何证明引入和实施无年级学校的合理性,以及他们对实施过程中出现的挑战和机遇有何经验。采用半结构化的深入访谈来收集数据。研究结果表明,校长们在证明向无年级学校转变的合理性时,依赖于研究和令人不满意的评估实践。然而,他们认为学生的参与,以及针对家长的有关实施的信息都不够。他们还提到了与当前评估系统相关的挑战,他们认为这是对学习的行为主义理解的基础。这篇文章呼吁更多地研究各种利益相关者之间的信任以及学生在实施免试学校时的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Principals’ views on the implementation of grade-free middle schools in Norway: justifications, challenges and opportunities
This article reports on four principals’ views on the implementation of so-called grade-free middle schools, i.e. schools that drop all grades on students’ performances except the two required by the national assessment regulation, as part of their work with Assessment for Learning (AfL). More specifically, we were interested in the under-researched area of how principals justify introducing and implementing grade-free schools, and what their experiences are regarding challenges and opportunities that have arisen during and as a result of the implementation. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to collect data. Findings suggest that principals rely on research and unsatisfying assessment practices when justifying a change to grade-free schools. However, they do not find the involvement of students, nor the information directed at parents about the implementation, to be sufficient. They also mention challenges related to the current assessment system, which they believe underpin a behavioristic understanding of learning. The article calls for more research on trust among various stakeholders and student involvement when implementing grade-free schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Læreres kunnskapskilder til skriveopplæring i begynneropplæringen «Veiledninga fra praksislærer sluttet liksom ikke den dagen vi var ferdige i praksis». En studie av trepartssamarbeid rundt lærerstudenters FoU-oppgave «Vi kunne bare slette opptaket og ta det opp på nytt igjen». Elevers erfaringer med å produsere podkaster i litteraturundervisningen på videregående Annerledes og likeverdig: førstelektorstillingens skjebne under akademias konvensjoner Emneansvarliges perspektiv på etikkundervisning i økonomiskadministrativ bachelorutdanning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1