阿干事件类型与因果关系的直接性

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Cognitive Semantics Pub Date : 2021-04-27 DOI:10.1163/23526416-07010001
R. A. Duah, E. Osam, N. Amfo
{"title":"阿干事件类型与因果关系的直接性","authors":"R. A. Duah, E. Osam, N. Amfo","doi":"10.1163/23526416-07010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper presents a proposal on the form-function correlation between direct causation and non-periphrastic causatives on one hand, and indirect causation and periphrastic causatives on the other hand. The study argues that notions of direct and indirect causation are actually features of event types of causation and vary across different event types. We present five event types of causation found in Akan causatives and isolate their properties with regard to the causer, causee, control of resultant state/event and (in)direct physical contact between causer and causee. We show that in Akan, all types of causatives, lexical, cause-effect SVC and analytic causatives can encode any of the major event types of causation. Consequently, rather than mapping causative expressions with notions of direct or indirect causation, we analyze (in)directness of causation as a feature of event types of causation, not of causative expressions themselves. Thus, although the form-function correlation in causatives may hold in some languages we argue that (in)direct causation is not encoded separately in causative forms and constructions.","PeriodicalId":52227,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semantics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Event Types and (In)Directness of Causation in Akan\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Duah, E. Osam, N. Amfo\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23526416-07010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper presents a proposal on the form-function correlation between direct causation and non-periphrastic causatives on one hand, and indirect causation and periphrastic causatives on the other hand. The study argues that notions of direct and indirect causation are actually features of event types of causation and vary across different event types. We present five event types of causation found in Akan causatives and isolate their properties with regard to the causer, causee, control of resultant state/event and (in)direct physical contact between causer and causee. We show that in Akan, all types of causatives, lexical, cause-effect SVC and analytic causatives can encode any of the major event types of causation. Consequently, rather than mapping causative expressions with notions of direct or indirect causation, we analyze (in)directness of causation as a feature of event types of causation, not of causative expressions themselves. Thus, although the form-function correlation in causatives may hold in some languages we argue that (in)direct causation is not encoded separately in causative forms and constructions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Semantics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-07010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-07010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了直接使役与非委婉使役、间接使役与委婉使役之间的形式-功能关系。研究认为,直接因果关系和间接因果关系的概念实际上是因果关系事件类型的特征,并且在不同的事件类型中有所不同。我们提出了在阿坎致因中发现的五种事件类型的因果关系,并将它们的性质与起因、原因、结果状态/事件的控制以及因果之间的直接物理接触隔离。我们证明,在Akan中,所有类型的使词,词汇型,因果型SVC和解析型使词都可以编码任何主要事件类型的因果关系。因此,我们不是将因果表达式与直接或间接因果关系的概念相对应,而是将因果关系的直接性作为因果关系的事件类型的特征来分析,而不是作为因果表达式本身的特征来分析。因此,尽管使役句的形式-功能关联在某些语言中可能成立,但我们认为直接使役不是在使役形式和结构中单独编码的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Event Types and (In)Directness of Causation in Akan
This paper presents a proposal on the form-function correlation between direct causation and non-periphrastic causatives on one hand, and indirect causation and periphrastic causatives on the other hand. The study argues that notions of direct and indirect causation are actually features of event types of causation and vary across different event types. We present five event types of causation found in Akan causatives and isolate their properties with regard to the causer, causee, control of resultant state/event and (in)direct physical contact between causer and causee. We show that in Akan, all types of causatives, lexical, cause-effect SVC and analytic causatives can encode any of the major event types of causation. Consequently, rather than mapping causative expressions with notions of direct or indirect causation, we analyze (in)directness of causation as a feature of event types of causation, not of causative expressions themselves. Thus, although the form-function correlation in causatives may hold in some languages we argue that (in)direct causation is not encoded separately in causative forms and constructions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semantics
Cognitive Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Overhauling Collostructional Analysis: Towards More Descriptive Simplicity and More Explanatory Adequacy Radial Representations of the Semantics of Reduplicative Constructions in Nigerian Pidgin (Naija) Words of Wonder: The Cognitive and Semantic Dimension of the Literal and Figurative Denominators for wonder in Old English Sources Inconsistency in Conceptual Metaphor Theory Speakers’ Gestures and Semantic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1