对鹅有好处的就是对雄鹅有好处:史学和历史的耶稣

IF 1.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus Pub Date : 2017-12-11 DOI:10.1163/17455197-01502008
Benjamin C. F. Shaw
{"title":"对鹅有好处的就是对雄鹅有好处:史学和历史的耶稣","authors":"Benjamin C. F. Shaw","doi":"10.1163/17455197-01502008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A central question raised in a 2011 issue of the JSHJ is how can evangelical scholars productively contribute to historical Jesus research which seems to presuppose tenets at variance with their faith. The impetus for the issue was the 2009 book Key Events in the Life of the Historical Jesus which was the product of several evangelical scholars who had been working together for a decade. The goal of this paper will be to identify and assess three significant historiographical concerns raised in the 2011 issue – worldviews, presuppositions, and biases as both positives and negatives; criteria for authenticity and negative historical judgements; and lastly methodological naturalism – in order to demonstrate that these are issues all historians pursuing historical Jesus research must equally confront.","PeriodicalId":51987,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus","volume":"15 1","pages":"291-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17455197-01502008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander: Historiography and the Historical Jesus\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin C. F. Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17455197-01502008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A central question raised in a 2011 issue of the JSHJ is how can evangelical scholars productively contribute to historical Jesus research which seems to presuppose tenets at variance with their faith. The impetus for the issue was the 2009 book Key Events in the Life of the Historical Jesus which was the product of several evangelical scholars who had been working together for a decade. The goal of this paper will be to identify and assess three significant historiographical concerns raised in the 2011 issue – worldviews, presuppositions, and biases as both positives and negatives; criteria for authenticity and negative historical judgements; and lastly methodological naturalism – in order to demonstrate that these are issues all historians pursuing historical Jesus research must equally confront.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"291-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17455197-01502008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01502008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01502008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2011年的一期JSHJ中提出的一个核心问题是,福音派学者如何有效地为历史耶稣研究做出贡献,而历史耶稣研究似乎以与他们的信仰不一致的原则为前提。这一问题的推动力是2009年出版的《历史耶稣一生中的关键事件》一书,该书是几位福音派学者合作了十年的产物。本文的目标是确定和评估2011年期刊中提出的三个重要的史学问题——世界观、预设和偏见,既是积极的,也是消极的;真实性标准和负面历史判断;最后是方法自然主义——为了证明这些都是所有从事历史耶稣研究的历史学家必须平等面对的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander: Historiography and the Historical Jesus
A central question raised in a 2011 issue of the JSHJ is how can evangelical scholars productively contribute to historical Jesus research which seems to presuppose tenets at variance with their faith. The impetus for the issue was the 2009 book Key Events in the Life of the Historical Jesus which was the product of several evangelical scholars who had been working together for a decade. The goal of this paper will be to identify and assess three significant historiographical concerns raised in the 2011 issue – worldviews, presuppositions, and biases as both positives and negatives; criteria for authenticity and negative historical judgements; and lastly methodological naturalism – in order to demonstrate that these are issues all historians pursuing historical Jesus research must equally confront.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus provides an international forum for the academic discussion of Jesus within the context of first-century Palestine. The journal is accessible to all who are interested in how this complex topic has been addressed in the past and how it is approached today. The journal investigates the social, cultural and historical context in which Jesus lived, discusses methodological issues surrounding the reconstruction of the historical Jesus, examines the history of research on Jesus and explores how the life of Jesus has been portrayed in the arts and other media.
期刊最新文献
Why Name Popularity is a Good Test of Historicity: A Goodness-of-Fit Test Analysis on Names in the Gospels and Acts Teaching the Historical Jesus over Three Decades, from Waikato to London Thoughts on Teaching Critical History Using the Historical Jesus He’s No Spartacus: Jesus, Slavery, and the Utopian Imagination Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1