从修辞人文主义的角度来看,参与大数据的五个考虑因素

Poroi Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.13008/2151-2957.1312
Z. Majdik
{"title":"从修辞人文主义的角度来看,参与大数据的五个考虑因素","authors":"Z. Majdik","doi":"10.13008/2151-2957.1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This essay offers five conceptual entry points for engaging with Big Data from a rhetorical perspective. These five concepts — data in/as relationships, observability/action, patterns, diachronicity, and audience — serve as points of deep conceptual commonality between definitions of Big Data and principles in rhetorical studies and are offered here as considerations for critiquing uses of Big Data from a rhetorical-humanistic perspective, as well as for guiding rhetorical work that uses Big Data.","PeriodicalId":93222,"journal":{"name":"Poroi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five considerations for engaging with Big Data from a rhetorical-humanistic perspective\",\"authors\":\"Z. Majdik\",\"doi\":\"10.13008/2151-2957.1312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This essay offers five conceptual entry points for engaging with Big Data from a rhetorical perspective. These five concepts — data in/as relationships, observability/action, patterns, diachronicity, and audience — serve as points of deep conceptual commonality between definitions of Big Data and principles in rhetorical studies and are offered here as considerations for critiquing uses of Big Data from a rhetorical-humanistic perspective, as well as for guiding rhetorical work that uses Big Data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poroi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poroi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poroi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章从修辞的角度提供了参与大数据的五个概念切入点。这五个概念——数据在/作为关系、可观察性/行动、模式、历时性和受众——是大数据定义与修辞学研究原则之间深刻的概念共性点,在这里从修辞学-人文主义的角度批评大数据的使用,以及指导使用大数据的修辞学工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Five considerations for engaging with Big Data from a rhetorical-humanistic perspective
: This essay offers five conceptual entry points for engaging with Big Data from a rhetorical perspective. These five concepts — data in/as relationships, observability/action, patterns, diachronicity, and audience — serve as points of deep conceptual commonality between definitions of Big Data and principles in rhetorical studies and are offered here as considerations for critiquing uses of Big Data from a rhetorical-humanistic perspective, as well as for guiding rhetorical work that uses Big Data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relevance of Discursive Strategies to Information Evaluation Practices Rhetorical Ethnography and the Virtue of Vulnerability in Transdisciplinary Research Methods Binding Brain, Body and World: Pattern as a Figure of Knowledge in Andy Clark’s Work on Predictive Processing Johanna d'Arc of Mongolia As the Fairy Tale of Shock Economy Seeing as Making: Mediation, rhetoric, and the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1