品位问题:最高法院与合同解释

Lord Sumption
{"title":"品位问题:最高法院与合同解释","authors":"Lord Sumption","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2017.1351755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This is the text of the inaugural Farquharson Lecture, delivered at Keble College, Oxford, on 8 May 2017. These Lectures were established by the Harris Society, the law society at Keble College, in honour of The Rt Hon Sir Donald Farquharson, an Old Member and Honorary Fellow of the College who served as a Lord Justice of Appeal between 1989 and 1995 and passed away in 2011. The 2017 Lecture discusses the approach to the interpretation of contracts adopted by the Supreme Court in a number of recent cases. It concludes that the Court may be retreating from the principles set out by Lord Hoffmann in Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896. The Lecture is reproduced here with the kind permission of its organisers, Dr James Goudkamp and Mr Sebastian Bates, and appears as it was delivered, with only minor editorial changes.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2017.1351755","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A question of taste: the Supreme Court and the interpretation of contracts\",\"authors\":\"Lord Sumption\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14729342.2017.1351755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This is the text of the inaugural Farquharson Lecture, delivered at Keble College, Oxford, on 8 May 2017. These Lectures were established by the Harris Society, the law society at Keble College, in honour of The Rt Hon Sir Donald Farquharson, an Old Member and Honorary Fellow of the College who served as a Lord Justice of Appeal between 1989 and 1995 and passed away in 2011. The 2017 Lecture discusses the approach to the interpretation of contracts adopted by the Supreme Court in a number of recent cases. It concludes that the Court may be retreating from the principles set out by Lord Hoffmann in Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896. The Lecture is reproduced here with the kind permission of its organisers, Dr James Goudkamp and Mr Sebastian Bates, and appears as it was delivered, with only minor editorial changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2017.1351755\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1351755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1351755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要这是2017年5月8日在牛津大学凯布尔学院举行的法夸尔森首届讲座的正文。这些讲座由凯布尔学院的律师会哈里斯协会设立,以纪念该学院的老会员和荣誉院士唐纳德·法夸尔森爵士,他曾在1989年至1995年间担任上诉大法官,并于2011年去世。2017年的讲座讨论了最高法院在最近的一些案件中采用的合同解释方法。法院的结论是,法院可能会放弃霍夫曼勋爵在投资者赔偿计划有限公司诉West Bromwich Building Society[1998]1 WLR 896案中提出的原则。该讲座在组织者James Goudkamp博士和Sebastian Bates先生的善意许可下转载,并按原样发表,只做了微小的编辑修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A question of taste: the Supreme Court and the interpretation of contracts
ABSTRACT This is the text of the inaugural Farquharson Lecture, delivered at Keble College, Oxford, on 8 May 2017. These Lectures were established by the Harris Society, the law society at Keble College, in honour of The Rt Hon Sir Donald Farquharson, an Old Member and Honorary Fellow of the College who served as a Lord Justice of Appeal between 1989 and 1995 and passed away in 2011. The 2017 Lecture discusses the approach to the interpretation of contracts adopted by the Supreme Court in a number of recent cases. It concludes that the Court may be retreating from the principles set out by Lord Hoffmann in Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896. The Lecture is reproduced here with the kind permission of its organisers, Dr James Goudkamp and Mr Sebastian Bates, and appears as it was delivered, with only minor editorial changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Blurring boundaries on ‘taking part’ in an unlawful assembly: HKSAR v Choy Kin Yue (2022) 25 HKCFAR 360 ‘The law has taken all my rights away’: on India’s conundrum of able-normative death with dignity ‘Delicate plants’, ‘loose cannons’, or ‘a marriage of true minds’? The role of academic literature in judicial decision-making Legal transplantation of minors’ contracts in India and Malaysia: ‘Weak’ Watson and a ‘misfitted’ transplant Corruption and the constitutional position of the Overseas Territories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1