应对COVID-19大流行的非药物干预策略:偏好排序法

L. Abdullah, Harish Garg, N. A. Awang, Herrini Mohd Pauzi, H. Hashim
{"title":"应对COVID-19大流行的非药物干预策略:偏好排序法","authors":"L. Abdullah, Harish Garg, N. A. Awang, Herrini Mohd Pauzi, H. Hashim","doi":"10.31181/oresta051022076a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the hot topics of discussion today is coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The disease is easily transmitted from one person to another person. However, there are no specific drugs that can alleviate the disease thus non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies is a good option. This paper aims to apply the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method to outrank the intervention strategies. A case study is presented where five experts were invited to rate ten alternatives and ten criteria using linguistic scales. Spreadsheet software and PROMETHEE-GAIA software were employed to establish outranking results and to provide evidence on the vigorousness of the outranking results. The final outranking indicates that the most and the least preferred intervention strategies are alternative A1 (lockdown/quarantine) and alternative A10 (Practice of hand hygiene) respectively. The outranking results are further analyzed with distribution analysis and weights sensitivity analysis where these analyses provide evidence on the vigorous of the outranking results. It is found that these analyses confirm the position of A1 as the most preferred intervention strategy to curtail the COVID-19 transmissions. The findings would be beneficial for public health authorities to deal with multiple challenges to curb the spread of COVID-19. © 2022 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)","PeriodicalId":36055,"journal":{"name":"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Strategies to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preference Ranking Method\",\"authors\":\"L. Abdullah, Harish Garg, N. A. Awang, Herrini Mohd Pauzi, H. Hashim\",\"doi\":\"10.31181/oresta051022076a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the hot topics of discussion today is coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The disease is easily transmitted from one person to another person. However, there are no specific drugs that can alleviate the disease thus non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies is a good option. This paper aims to apply the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method to outrank the intervention strategies. A case study is presented where five experts were invited to rate ten alternatives and ten criteria using linguistic scales. Spreadsheet software and PROMETHEE-GAIA software were employed to establish outranking results and to provide evidence on the vigorousness of the outranking results. The final outranking indicates that the most and the least preferred intervention strategies are alternative A1 (lockdown/quarantine) and alternative A10 (Practice of hand hygiene) respectively. The outranking results are further analyzed with distribution analysis and weights sensitivity analysis where these analyses provide evidence on the vigorous of the outranking results. It is found that these analyses confirm the position of A1 as the most preferred intervention strategy to curtail the COVID-19 transmissions. The findings would be beneficial for public health authorities to deal with multiple challenges to curb the spread of COVID-19. © 2022 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)\",\"PeriodicalId\":36055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta051022076a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta051022076a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

今天讨论的热门话题之一是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。这种疾病很容易从一个人传染给另一个人。然而,没有特定的药物可以减轻疾病,因此非药物干预策略是一个很好的选择。本文旨在应用富集评价偏好排序组织法(PROMETHEE)方法对干预策略进行排序。在一个案例研究中,五位专家被邀请使用语言量表对十个备选方案和十个标准进行评级。采用电子表格软件和promehee - gaia软件建立优级结果,并对优级结果的有力性提供证据。最终排名表明,最受欢迎和最不受欢迎的干预策略分别是备选A1(封锁/隔离)和备选A10(手部卫生实践)。通过分布分析和权值敏感性分析,对排名结果进行了进一步分析,为排名结果的有效性提供了依据。这些分析证实了A1是遏制COVID-19传播的首选干预策略的地位。这一发现将有助于公共卫生当局应对遏制新冠病毒传播的多重挑战。©2022作者所有。在知识共享署名(CC BY)许可的条款和条件下提交,以供可能的开放获取出版(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Strategies to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preference Ranking Method
One of the hot topics of discussion today is coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The disease is easily transmitted from one person to another person. However, there are no specific drugs that can alleviate the disease thus non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies is a good option. This paper aims to apply the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method to outrank the intervention strategies. A case study is presented where five experts were invited to rate ten alternatives and ten criteria using linguistic scales. Spreadsheet software and PROMETHEE-GAIA software were employed to establish outranking results and to provide evidence on the vigorousness of the outranking results. The final outranking indicates that the most and the least preferred intervention strategies are alternative A1 (lockdown/quarantine) and alternative A10 (Practice of hand hygiene) respectively. The outranking results are further analyzed with distribution analysis and weights sensitivity analysis where these analyses provide evidence on the vigorous of the outranking results. It is found that these analyses confirm the position of A1 as the most preferred intervention strategy to curtail the COVID-19 transmissions. The findings would be beneficial for public health authorities to deal with multiple challenges to curb the spread of COVID-19. © 2022 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Strategies to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preference Ranking Method Ranking the Recreational Leadership Factors in the Behavioral Dimension and Selection of the Most Ideal Organizational Citizenship Model A Two-Stage Integrated Model for Supplier Selection and Order Allocation: An Application in Dairy Industry Simulation of Job Sequencing for Stochastic Scheduling with a Genetic Algorithm Optimal Load Scheduling of Home Appliances Considering Operation Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1