“善于分析”、“易怒”和“(太)诚实”?学习者对德语教师的刻板印象

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.1111/tger.12207
Lucian Rothe
{"title":"“善于分析”、“易怒”和“(太)诚实”?学习者对德语教师的刻板印象","authors":"Lucian Rothe","doi":"10.1111/tger.12207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated stereotypes about teachers of German that 67 novice learners of German at a U.S. university had reportedly encountered. Consequently, the investigation explored the perceived accuracy of clichés associated with native-speaker and non-native-speaker instructors. Students' stereotypical notions were sorted into categories using principles of grounded theory. Statistical analyses showed that respondents were able to list various stereotypes about instructors of German. Responses also reflected societal narratives concerning native-speaker and non-native-speaker teachers' strengths and shortcomings. Last, and of importance to the future of German Studies, participants considered more favorable stereotypes about teachers as more accurate and less-favorable clichés as more inaccurate. The study discusses implications for teaching, program advertisement, and research on how learners' imagined construct of the language classroom community may benefit the study of German.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"55 2","pages":"151-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Analytical,” “Angry,” and “(Too) Honest”?! Learners' Stereotypes about Teachers of German\",\"authors\":\"Lucian Rothe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tger.12207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated stereotypes about teachers of German that 67 novice learners of German at a U.S. university had reportedly encountered. Consequently, the investigation explored the perceived accuracy of clichés associated with native-speaker and non-native-speaker instructors. Students' stereotypical notions were sorted into categories using principles of grounded theory. Statistical analyses showed that respondents were able to list various stereotypes about instructors of German. Responses also reflected societal narratives concerning native-speaker and non-native-speaker teachers' strengths and shortcomings. Last, and of importance to the future of German Studies, participants considered more favorable stereotypes about teachers as more accurate and less-favorable clichés as more inaccurate. The study discusses implications for teaching, program advertisement, and research on how learners' imagined construct of the language classroom community may benefit the study of German.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"151-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究调查了67名在美国大学学习德语的新手对德语教师的刻板印象。因此,调查探讨了与母语和非母语教师有关的陈词滥调的感知准确性。根据扎根理论的原则,将学生的刻板印象分类。统计分析表明,受访者能够列出对德语教师的各种刻板印象。调查结果还反映了社会对母语教师和非母语教师优缺点的看法。最后,也是对德语研究的未来很重要的一点是,参与者认为对教师更有利的刻板印象更准确,而对教师不利的刻板印象更不准确。本研究探讨了教学、节目广告的意义,以及学习者对语言课堂共同体的想象建构如何有益于德语学习的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Analytical,” “Angry,” and “(Too) Honest”?! Learners' Stereotypes about Teachers of German

This study investigated stereotypes about teachers of German that 67 novice learners of German at a U.S. university had reportedly encountered. Consequently, the investigation explored the perceived accuracy of clichés associated with native-speaker and non-native-speaker instructors. Students' stereotypical notions were sorted into categories using principles of grounded theory. Statistical analyses showed that respondents were able to list various stereotypes about instructors of German. Responses also reflected societal narratives concerning native-speaker and non-native-speaker teachers' strengths and shortcomings. Last, and of importance to the future of German Studies, participants considered more favorable stereotypes about teachers as more accurate and less-favorable clichés as more inaccurate. The study discusses implications for teaching, program advertisement, and research on how learners' imagined construct of the language classroom community may benefit the study of German.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Praxis articles and Forum on recruitment and retention Back in business! Professional German(s) at Rhodes College Uncertainty is in the Form: A functional, meaning-based approach to teaching ambiguity as author choice in Kafka's “Vor dem Gesetz” A collaboration between a high school and a college German program: Retention and articulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1