“煤气灯”的兴起:关于推特和4chan上虚假信息的辩论,以及“良好回音室”的可能性

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Popular Communication Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1080/15405702.2022.2044042
T. Shane, Tom Willaert, M. Tuters
{"title":"“煤气灯”的兴起:关于推特和4chan上虚假信息的辩论,以及“良好回音室”的可能性","authors":"T. Shane, Tom Willaert, M. Tuters","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2022.2044042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Public concern about “gaslighting” has increased significantly in recent years, both in sociology and the public imagination. As well as describing abuse in romantic relationships, the term has provided a lens for popular understanding of “post-truth” politics. Given that metaphors influence how problems are conceptualized and responded to, we ask how “gaslighting” shapes popular responses to disinformation on Twitter and the conspiracy-rich 4chan. We find that discussions of gaslighting increased significantly on both platforms between 2020–2021, and spiked during the week of the United States 2020 election. We also show that the metaphor can powerfully contest disinformation, while at the same time spread self-sealing and self-fulfilling anxieties about deception that are resistant to disagreement. In light of these findings, we consider how a well designed and well intentioned “good echo chamber” might constitute a technique of resistance to online disinformation.","PeriodicalId":45584,"journal":{"name":"Popular Communication","volume":"20 1","pages":"178 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rise of “gaslighting”: debates about disinformation on Twitter and 4chan, and the possibility of a “good echo chamber”\",\"authors\":\"T. Shane, Tom Willaert, M. Tuters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15405702.2022.2044042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Public concern about “gaslighting” has increased significantly in recent years, both in sociology and the public imagination. As well as describing abuse in romantic relationships, the term has provided a lens for popular understanding of “post-truth” politics. Given that metaphors influence how problems are conceptualized and responded to, we ask how “gaslighting” shapes popular responses to disinformation on Twitter and the conspiracy-rich 4chan. We find that discussions of gaslighting increased significantly on both platforms between 2020–2021, and spiked during the week of the United States 2020 election. We also show that the metaphor can powerfully contest disinformation, while at the same time spread self-sealing and self-fulfilling anxieties about deception that are resistant to disagreement. In light of these findings, we consider how a well designed and well intentioned “good echo chamber” might constitute a technique of resistance to online disinformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Popular Communication\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"178 - 192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Popular Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2044042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2044042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要近年来,无论是在社会学还是在公众想象中,公众对“煤气灯”的关注都显著增加。除了描述浪漫关系中的虐待行为,这个词还为大众理解“后真相”政治提供了一个视角。鉴于隐喻会影响问题的概念化和应对方式,我们想知道“煤气灯”是如何塑造人们对推特和阴谋丰富的4chan上虚假信息的普遍反应的。我们发现,在2020年至2021年期间,两个平台上关于煤气灯的讨论都大幅增加,并在2020年美国大选的一周内激增。我们还表明,这个比喻可以有力地对抗虚假信息,同时传播对欺骗的自我封闭和自我实现的焦虑,这些焦虑是抵制分歧的。根据这些发现,我们考虑一个设计良好、意图良好的“好回音室”如何构成一种抵制网络虚假信息的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The rise of “gaslighting”: debates about disinformation on Twitter and 4chan, and the possibility of a “good echo chamber”
ABSTRACT Public concern about “gaslighting” has increased significantly in recent years, both in sociology and the public imagination. As well as describing abuse in romantic relationships, the term has provided a lens for popular understanding of “post-truth” politics. Given that metaphors influence how problems are conceptualized and responded to, we ask how “gaslighting” shapes popular responses to disinformation on Twitter and the conspiracy-rich 4chan. We find that discussions of gaslighting increased significantly on both platforms between 2020–2021, and spiked during the week of the United States 2020 election. We also show that the metaphor can powerfully contest disinformation, while at the same time spread self-sealing and self-fulfilling anxieties about deception that are resistant to disagreement. In light of these findings, we consider how a well designed and well intentioned “good echo chamber” might constitute a technique of resistance to online disinformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Popular Communication
Popular Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Video game characters and transmedia storytelling. The dynamic game character, A big little fiction form: last decade of production and circulation of made-for-TV movies in Europe Unspooled: how the cassette made music sharable Mourning the greatest: “unforgivably black” and peacefully Muslim Muhammad Ali “Bones are life!” true-crime podcasting, self-promotion and the vernaculars of Instagram with Cult Liter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1