重新审视组织战略的迈尔斯和斯诺类型:揭示战略决策与公共组织绩效之间的相互关系

Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali, B. Ababneh
{"title":"重新审视组织战略的迈尔斯和斯诺类型:揭示战略决策与公共组织绩效之间的相互关系","authors":"Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali, B. Ababneh","doi":"10.1080/12294659.2021.1904604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to reexamine the Miles and Snow strategy stance framework by uncovering the interrelationships between strategy content, strategic decision-making, and public organizational performance. The data for this study were collected from 224 respondents in senior management across public organizations in the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus (TRNC). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data collected. The study found that the most important predictor of the three types of Miles and Snow typologies of strategy stances to be the prospector one followed by the reactor stance, while defenders have no significant effect on the use of performance information for both strategy implementation and reporting decision-making alongside public organizational performance. Our empirical analysis examines the question of whether the strategy content approaches adopted by public organizations in the TRNC and the use of performance information for strategic decision-making are conducive to enhanced and improved public organizational performance.","PeriodicalId":39993,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Public Administration","volume":"26 1","pages":"209 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/12294659.2021.1904604","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Miles and Snow typology of organizational strategy: uncovering interrelationships between strategic decision-making and public organizational performance\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali, B. Ababneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12294659.2021.1904604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study aims to reexamine the Miles and Snow strategy stance framework by uncovering the interrelationships between strategy content, strategic decision-making, and public organizational performance. The data for this study were collected from 224 respondents in senior management across public organizations in the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus (TRNC). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data collected. The study found that the most important predictor of the three types of Miles and Snow typologies of strategy stances to be the prospector one followed by the reactor stance, while defenders have no significant effect on the use of performance information for both strategy implementation and reporting decision-making alongside public organizational performance. Our empirical analysis examines the question of whether the strategy content approaches adopted by public organizations in the TRNC and the use of performance information for strategic decision-making are conducive to enhanced and improved public organizational performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/12294659.2021.1904604\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2021.1904604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2021.1904604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究旨在通过揭示战略内容、战略决策和公共组织绩效之间的相互关系,重新审视Miles和Snow的战略立场框架。本研究的数据收集自北塞浦路斯土耳其共和国(TRNC)公共组织高级管理人员中的224名受访者。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对采集的数据进行分析。研究发现,在Miles和Snow的三种战略立场类型中,最重要的预测因素是探勘者立场,其次是反应者立场,而防御者立场对战略实施和报告决策以及公共组织绩效的绩效信息的使用没有显著影响。我们的实证分析考察了TRNC公共组织采用的战略内容方法和在战略决策中使用绩效信息是否有助于增强和改善公共组织绩效的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the Miles and Snow typology of organizational strategy: uncovering interrelationships between strategic decision-making and public organizational performance
ABSTRACT This study aims to reexamine the Miles and Snow strategy stance framework by uncovering the interrelationships between strategy content, strategic decision-making, and public organizational performance. The data for this study were collected from 224 respondents in senior management across public organizations in the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus (TRNC). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data collected. The study found that the most important predictor of the three types of Miles and Snow typologies of strategy stances to be the prospector one followed by the reactor stance, while defenders have no significant effect on the use of performance information for both strategy implementation and reporting decision-making alongside public organizational performance. Our empirical analysis examines the question of whether the strategy content approaches adopted by public organizations in the TRNC and the use of performance information for strategic decision-making are conducive to enhanced and improved public organizational performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Public Administration
International Review of Public Administration Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Review of Public Administration (ISSN 1229-4659) is published biannually by the Korean Association for Public Administration (KAPA) to provide a worldwide audience with the opportunity for communication and further understanding on issues of public administration and policy. There will be a triple-blind peer review process for all submissions of articles of general interest. There are no particular limitations on subject areas as long as they are related to the field of public administration and policy or deal with public employees. Articles should be analytic and demonstrate the highest standards of excellence in conceptualization, craftsmanship, and methodology.
期刊最新文献
Curvilinear dynamics of job demands, resources, and resilience: the impact of HR practices on public managers Outsourcing and backsourcing in a time of crisis – experiences of double opportunism A systematic literature review of budget participation: foundations, trends, and ways forward How does the stringency of state tax and expenditure limitations influence opportunistic taxation? Rural and regional development in the age of digital platforms: platformization of the Japanese Furusato Nozei Hometown Tax Donation System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1