在埃塞俄比亚小农公有土地问题上无主权与公有权

Q4 Social Sciences Mizan Law Review Pub Date : 2018-12-18 DOI:10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4
Daniel Behailu Gebreamanuel, Getiso Detamo Mekebo
{"title":"在埃塞俄比亚小农公有土地问题上无主权与公有权","authors":"Daniel Behailu Gebreamanuel, Getiso Detamo Mekebo","doi":"10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communal land is among the key factors in the enhancement of rural livelihood because it enables mixed farming practices. Although communal lands are prime sources of livelihood in rural farming communities, empirical evidence shows gaps in their legal recognition and protection in Ethiopia. There are encroachments which include government intrusion, informal land sale, distribution, and handing out land (selling communal land in informal markets) as Kebele’s contribution for development projects. These factors entrench poverty by sidelining the rural poor at the grassroots whose life is anchored on these lands. These problems also entail violation of human rights of the rural population. This article interrogates the misconception which tends to consider communal lands (customary land tenure) as res nullius (ownerless property) while such lands are in fact res communis (community property). The article uses the Hadiya Zone as a case study. It is argued that there is the need for the effective implementation and amendment of land laws which require political will to ensure tenure security of communal lands thereby securing and diversifying the livelihoods of poor smallholder rural farmers and ensuring human rights . Key terms Communal lands · Livestock · Poverty · Livelihoods · Rural Poor · Tenure security","PeriodicalId":30178,"journal":{"name":"Mizan Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Res Nullius vs. Res Communis in Matters of Communal Lands of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Behailu Gebreamanuel, Getiso Detamo Mekebo\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Communal land is among the key factors in the enhancement of rural livelihood because it enables mixed farming practices. Although communal lands are prime sources of livelihood in rural farming communities, empirical evidence shows gaps in their legal recognition and protection in Ethiopia. There are encroachments which include government intrusion, informal land sale, distribution, and handing out land (selling communal land in informal markets) as Kebele’s contribution for development projects. These factors entrench poverty by sidelining the rural poor at the grassroots whose life is anchored on these lands. These problems also entail violation of human rights of the rural population. This article interrogates the misconception which tends to consider communal lands (customary land tenure) as res nullius (ownerless property) while such lands are in fact res communis (community property). The article uses the Hadiya Zone as a case study. It is argued that there is the need for the effective implementation and amendment of land laws which require political will to ensure tenure security of communal lands thereby securing and diversifying the livelihoods of poor smallholder rural farmers and ensuring human rights . Key terms Communal lands · Livestock · Poverty · Livelihoods · Rural Poor · Tenure security\",\"PeriodicalId\":30178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mizan Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mizan Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizan Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v12i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公共土地是改善农村生计的关键因素之一,因为它使混合耕作成为可能。虽然公共土地是农村农业社区的主要生计来源,但经验证据表明,在埃塞俄比亚,公共土地的法律承认和保护存在差距。这些侵犯包括政府入侵、非正式的土地出售、分配和分发土地(在非正式市场上出售公共土地),作为Kebele对发展项目的贡献。这些因素使生活在这些土地上的农村基层贫困人口边缘化,从而加剧了贫困。这些问题还造成对农村人口人权的侵犯。这篇文章质疑了一种误解,这种误解倾向于将公共土地(习惯土地使用权)视为无主财产(无主财产),而这些土地实际上是社区财产(社区财产)。本文以Hadiya地区为例进行研究。有人认为,有必要有效地执行和修订土地法,这需要政治意愿来确保公共土地的保有权安全,从而确保贫穷的农村小农的生计并使其多样化,并确保人权。关键词公共土地·牲畜·贫困·生计·农村贫困·权属保障
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Res Nullius vs. Res Communis in Matters of Communal Lands of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia
Communal land is among the key factors in the enhancement of rural livelihood because it enables mixed farming practices. Although communal lands are prime sources of livelihood in rural farming communities, empirical evidence shows gaps in their legal recognition and protection in Ethiopia. There are encroachments which include government intrusion, informal land sale, distribution, and handing out land (selling communal land in informal markets) as Kebele’s contribution for development projects. These factors entrench poverty by sidelining the rural poor at the grassroots whose life is anchored on these lands. These problems also entail violation of human rights of the rural population. This article interrogates the misconception which tends to consider communal lands (customary land tenure) as res nullius (ownerless property) while such lands are in fact res communis (community property). The article uses the Hadiya Zone as a case study. It is argued that there is the need for the effective implementation and amendment of land laws which require political will to ensure tenure security of communal lands thereby securing and diversifying the livelihoods of poor smallholder rural farmers and ensuring human rights . Key terms Communal lands · Livestock · Poverty · Livelihoods · Rural Poor · Tenure security
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Formalization of Rural Women’s Land Rights in a Plural Justice System: The Case of the Sidama Regional State Concurrence of Crimes under Ethiopian Law: General Principles vis-à-vis Tax Law Regulation of Group of Companies in Ethiopia: A Comparative Overview Private Security Companies in Ethiopia: An Insight from a Rights Perspective Business and Human Rights in Ethiopia: The Status of the Law and the Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1