谁拥有图书馆创建的书目元数据?

IF 1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Library Administration Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI:10.1080/01930826.2023.2177928
George S. Machovec
{"title":"谁拥有图书馆创建的书目元数据?","authors":"George S. Machovec","doi":"10.1080/01930826.2023.2177928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The ownership of MARC bibliographic data has been an issue between OCLC and other companies in the marketplace. Two lawsuits are discussed between OCLC and Clarivate and SkyRiver. The “WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative” provides a basis for many library contracts and how OCLC lays claim to bibliographic data. The “ICOLC Statement on the Metadata Rights of Libraries” is used as a general framework for discussing issues surrounding who owns MARC records and how they can be used or re-used. Most librarians are interested in free and open use of MARC records whether or not they may have passed through the OCLC system at some point.","PeriodicalId":46427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Owns Bibliographic Metadata Created by Libraries?\",\"authors\":\"George S. Machovec\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01930826.2023.2177928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The ownership of MARC bibliographic data has been an issue between OCLC and other companies in the marketplace. Two lawsuits are discussed between OCLC and Clarivate and SkyRiver. The “WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative” provides a basis for many library contracts and how OCLC lays claim to bibliographic data. The “ICOLC Statement on the Metadata Rights of Libraries” is used as a general framework for discussing issues surrounding who owns MARC records and how they can be used or re-used. Most librarians are interested in free and open use of MARC records whether or not they may have passed through the OCLC system at some point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Library Administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Library Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2177928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2177928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

MARC书目数据的所有权一直是OCLC与市场上其他公司之间的一个问题。讨论了OCLC与Clarivate和SkyRiver之间的两起诉讼。“WorldCat OCLC合作的权利和责任”为许多图书馆合同以及OCLC如何声明书目数据提供了基础。“ICOLC关于图书馆元数据权利的声明”被用作讨论谁拥有MARC记录以及如何使用或再利用这些记录等问题的一般框架。大多数图书馆员都对MARC记录的免费和开放使用感兴趣,无论他们是否在某种程度上通过了OCLC系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Owns Bibliographic Metadata Created by Libraries?
Abstract The ownership of MARC bibliographic data has been an issue between OCLC and other companies in the marketplace. Two lawsuits are discussed between OCLC and Clarivate and SkyRiver. The “WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative” provides a basis for many library contracts and how OCLC lays claim to bibliographic data. The “ICOLC Statement on the Metadata Rights of Libraries” is used as a general framework for discussing issues surrounding who owns MARC records and how they can be used or re-used. Most librarians are interested in free and open use of MARC records whether or not they may have passed through the OCLC system at some point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library Administration
Journal of Library Administration INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
21.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Library Administration is the primary source of information on all aspects of the effective management of libraries. Stressing the practical, this valuable journal provides information that administrators need to efficiently and effectively manage their libraries. The journal seeks out the most modern advances being made in professional management and applies them to the library setting.
期刊最新文献
Tensions Associated with Responding to the Opioid Epidemic: Perspectives of Ohio Public Library Directors Conditions for Creativity and Innovation in the Work Environment of Academic Libraries in the United States and Canada Lessons in Leadership Successfully Managing a Library Employee’s Leave: Some Considerations Information Professionals’ Metaphorical Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Concept
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1