无创或有创机械通气在血液肿瘤患者急性呼吸衰竭中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2022-01-27 DOI:10.2174/1573398x18666220127104656
L. Barreto, C. Ravetti, N. S. Guimarães, V. Nobre
{"title":"无创或有创机械通气在血液肿瘤患者急性呼吸衰竭中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"L. Barreto, C. Ravetti, N. S. Guimarães, V. Nobre","doi":"10.2174/1573398x18666220127104656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAcute respiratory failure [ARF] in oncohematologic subjects is one of the most common causes of high mortality rates. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation [NIMV] has arisen as an accessory treatment in this clinical scenario.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to compare mortality rates and severity of illness associated with NIMV or invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV] in oncohematologic patients with ARF.\n\n\n\nA search was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Science, and gray literature databases, published between November 2007 and May 2021.\n\n\n\nEight studies with a total of 570 patients were included. Patients with good responses to NIMV showed lower values of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III [SAPS 3] [range: 42±7 to 53±17] when compared to those intubated following NIMV failure [range: 50±11 to 63.3±17.4] and those who underwent IMV as the primary ventilator support [range: 64.9±17.5 to 66±17]. Similarly, patients whose NIMV treatment failed and those that initially used IMV had higher baseline values of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score [SOFA] when compared to the group with a good response to NIMV. ICU mortality ranged from 40% to 68% in NIMV success, 54% to 79% in NIMV failure, and from 54% to 80% in the group treated with IMV. NIMV therapy had a significant protective effect on mortality [RR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, p=0.02].\n\n\n\nNIMV use in oncohematologic patients admitted to the ICU with ARF was associated with lower mortality. Patients successfully treated with the NIMV group showed lower values of SOFA and SAPS 3 [Prospero Systematic Review -protocol number: 132770].\n","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation in oncohematologic patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"L. Barreto, C. Ravetti, N. S. Guimarães, V. Nobre\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573398x18666220127104656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nAcute respiratory failure [ARF] in oncohematologic subjects is one of the most common causes of high mortality rates. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation [NIMV] has arisen as an accessory treatment in this clinical scenario.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study aimed to compare mortality rates and severity of illness associated with NIMV or invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV] in oncohematologic patients with ARF.\\n\\n\\n\\nA search was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Science, and gray literature databases, published between November 2007 and May 2021.\\n\\n\\n\\nEight studies with a total of 570 patients were included. Patients with good responses to NIMV showed lower values of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III [SAPS 3] [range: 42±7 to 53±17] when compared to those intubated following NIMV failure [range: 50±11 to 63.3±17.4] and those who underwent IMV as the primary ventilator support [range: 64.9±17.5 to 66±17]. Similarly, patients whose NIMV treatment failed and those that initially used IMV had higher baseline values of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score [SOFA] when compared to the group with a good response to NIMV. ICU mortality ranged from 40% to 68% in NIMV success, 54% to 79% in NIMV failure, and from 54% to 80% in the group treated with IMV. NIMV therapy had a significant protective effect on mortality [RR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, p=0.02].\\n\\n\\n\\nNIMV use in oncohematologic patients admitted to the ICU with ARF was associated with lower mortality. Patients successfully treated with the NIMV group showed lower values of SOFA and SAPS 3 [Prospero Systematic Review -protocol number: 132770].\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x18666220127104656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x18666220127104656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是导致血液肿瘤患者高死亡率的最常见原因之一。无创机械通气(NIMV)已成为这种临床情况下的辅助治疗方法。本研究旨在比较血液肿瘤合并急性肾功能衰竭患者与NIMV或有创机械通气(IMV)相关的死亡率和疾病严重程度。在PubMed、SCOPUS、Cochrane Library、LILACS、Web of Science和灰色文献数据库中进行了检索,检索时间为2007年11月至2021年5月。8项研究共纳入570例患者。与NIMV失败后插管的患者[范围:50±11至63.3±17.4]和将IMV作为主要呼吸机支持的患者[范围:64.9±17.5至66±17]相比,NIMV反应良好的患者的简化急性生理评分III [SAPS 3][范围:42±7至53±17]值较低。同样,NIMV治疗失败的患者和最初使用IMV的患者与NIMV反应良好的组相比,序贯器官衰竭评估评分(SOFA)的基线值更高。NIMV成功组ICU死亡率为40% - 68%,NIMV失败组为54% - 79%,IMV治疗组为54% - 80%。NIMV治疗对死亡率有显著的保护作用[RR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, p=0.02]。NIMV在急性肾功能衰竭住院ICU的血液肿瘤患者中使用与较低的死亡率相关。NIMV组成功治疗的患者SOFA和SAPS 3值较低[普洛斯普洛斯系统评价-方案号:132770]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation in oncohematologic patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acute respiratory failure [ARF] in oncohematologic subjects is one of the most common causes of high mortality rates. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation [NIMV] has arisen as an accessory treatment in this clinical scenario. This study aimed to compare mortality rates and severity of illness associated with NIMV or invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV] in oncohematologic patients with ARF. A search was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Science, and gray literature databases, published between November 2007 and May 2021. Eight studies with a total of 570 patients were included. Patients with good responses to NIMV showed lower values of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III [SAPS 3] [range: 42±7 to 53±17] when compared to those intubated following NIMV failure [range: 50±11 to 63.3±17.4] and those who underwent IMV as the primary ventilator support [range: 64.9±17.5 to 66±17]. Similarly, patients whose NIMV treatment failed and those that initially used IMV had higher baseline values of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score [SOFA] when compared to the group with a good response to NIMV. ICU mortality ranged from 40% to 68% in NIMV success, 54% to 79% in NIMV failure, and from 54% to 80% in the group treated with IMV. NIMV therapy had a significant protective effect on mortality [RR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, p=0.02]. NIMV use in oncohematologic patients admitted to the ICU with ARF was associated with lower mortality. Patients successfully treated with the NIMV group showed lower values of SOFA and SAPS 3 [Prospero Systematic Review -protocol number: 132770].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Lung Function and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Group 1 (Part A): Overview, Classification, Clinical Subsets, and Workup Deteriorating Pulmonary Functions in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis- A Pilot Study From South India COVID-19 Vaccines and the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study NAT2 Gene Variants as a Provocative Factor for the Severe Course of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Ukrainian Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1