激活范式的意识形态根源:正义偏好和失业归因如何塑造公众对要求激活政策的支持

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK International Journal of Social Welfare Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1111/ijsw.12628
Arno Van Hootegem, Federica Rossetti, Koen Abts, Bart Meuleman
{"title":"激活范式的意识形态根源:正义偏好和失业归因如何塑造公众对要求激活政策的支持","authors":"Arno Van Hootegem,&nbsp;Federica Rossetti,&nbsp;Koen Abts,&nbsp;Bart Meuleman","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.12628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research either focused on self-interest or left–right ideology to explain support for demanding active labour market policies (ALMPs). This article focuses instead on how attitudes towards these policies are rooted in the underlying policy paradigm. We link attitudes towards ALMPs to two pillars of the activation paradigm: distributive justice and unemployment attributions. Structural equational modeling is employed on the Belgian National Election Study data of 2014 (<i>N</i> = 1901). Individuals supporting the principles of need and equity and who blame the unemployed are more in favour of demanding activation. These frameworks and hence the policy paradigm thus have substantial predictive power.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"33 3","pages":"617-633"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.12628","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ideological roots of the activation paradigm: How justice preferences and unemployment attributions shape public support for demanding activation policies\",\"authors\":\"Arno Van Hootegem,&nbsp;Federica Rossetti,&nbsp;Koen Abts,&nbsp;Bart Meuleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijsw.12628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research either focused on self-interest or left–right ideology to explain support for demanding active labour market policies (ALMPs). This article focuses instead on how attitudes towards these policies are rooted in the underlying policy paradigm. We link attitudes towards ALMPs to two pillars of the activation paradigm: distributive justice and unemployment attributions. Structural equational modeling is employed on the Belgian National Election Study data of 2014 (<i>N</i> = 1901). Individuals supporting the principles of need and equity and who blame the unemployed are more in favour of demanding activation. These frameworks and hence the policy paradigm thus have substantial predictive power.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Welfare\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"617-633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.12628\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.12628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.12628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究要么侧重于私利,要么侧重于左右意识形态,以解释对要求积极的劳动力市场政策(ALMP)的支持。相反,本文关注的是对这些政策的态度是如何植根于潜在的政策范式的。我们将对ALMP的态度与激活范式的两个支柱联系起来:分配正义和失业归因。2014年比利时全国选举研究数据采用结构方程模型(N = 1901)。支持需求和公平原则并指责失业者的个人更倾向于要求激活。因此,这些框架以及政策模式具有很大的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The ideological roots of the activation paradigm: How justice preferences and unemployment attributions shape public support for demanding activation policies

Research either focused on self-interest or left–right ideology to explain support for demanding active labour market policies (ALMPs). This article focuses instead on how attitudes towards these policies are rooted in the underlying policy paradigm. We link attitudes towards ALMPs to two pillars of the activation paradigm: distributive justice and unemployment attributions. Structural equational modeling is employed on the Belgian National Election Study data of 2014 (N = 1901). Individuals supporting the principles of need and equity and who blame the unemployed are more in favour of demanding activation. These frameworks and hence the policy paradigm thus have substantial predictive power.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
期刊最新文献
The significance of crisis identification using community‐driven model Issue Information Whose children are we concerned about, and why? A cohort study of sociodemographic referral patterns to the Norwegian child welfare system Trajectories of NEET in individuals formerly placed in out‐of‐home care: A Swedish national cohort study COVID‐19 and support for basic income in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1