马克斯·韦伯社会学著作中的比较历史

Q2 Arts and Humanities The Sociological Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.1177/00380229221134614
R. Mohanty
{"title":"马克斯·韦伯社会学著作中的比较历史","authors":"R. Mohanty","doi":"10.1177/00380229221134614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been several contentions, characterisations and controversies over Max Weber’s treatment of history in his sociological writings both during his lifetime and after him as well. While some contest his contentions, others doubt the type of English translations made of his German writings. There is a need to take stock of and consolidate the sociologically relevant historical writings of Max Weber in proper perspective. The article raises the following two issues: (a) How can the claim be justified that Max Weber is one of the users of the comparative historical approach rather than one belonging to those using the evolutionary historical approach? (b) What are the specialities of his treatment of history in his methodology and substantive works? It is the specific intention of this article to consolidate the historical materials in the sociological writings of Weber so as to reconstruct his comparative historical approach as against positivist evolutionary history.","PeriodicalId":39369,"journal":{"name":"The Sociological Bulletin","volume":"72 1","pages":"56 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative History in Sociological Writings of Max Weber\",\"authors\":\"R. Mohanty\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00380229221134614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There have been several contentions, characterisations and controversies over Max Weber’s treatment of history in his sociological writings both during his lifetime and after him as well. While some contest his contentions, others doubt the type of English translations made of his German writings. There is a need to take stock of and consolidate the sociologically relevant historical writings of Max Weber in proper perspective. The article raises the following two issues: (a) How can the claim be justified that Max Weber is one of the users of the comparative historical approach rather than one belonging to those using the evolutionary historical approach? (b) What are the specialities of his treatment of history in his methodology and substantive works? It is the specific intention of this article to consolidate the historical materials in the sociological writings of Weber so as to reconstruct his comparative historical approach as against positivist evolutionary history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Sociological Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Sociological Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229221134614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Sociological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229221134614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于马克斯·韦伯在其社会学著作中对历史的处理,无论是在他有生之年还是在他之后,都存在着一些争论、刻画和争议。虽然一些人对他的论点提出质疑,但另一些人对他德语作品的英译类型表示怀疑。有必要从恰当的角度来评估和巩固马克斯·韦伯与社会学相关的历史著作。这篇文章提出了以下两个问题:(a)如何证明马克斯·韦伯是比较历史方法的使用者之一,而不是属于使用进化历史方法的人?(b) 在他的方法论和实质著作中,他处理历史的特点是什么?本文的具体意图是对韦伯社会学著作中的史料进行整理,以重建其反对实证主义进化史的比较史学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative History in Sociological Writings of Max Weber
There have been several contentions, characterisations and controversies over Max Weber’s treatment of history in his sociological writings both during his lifetime and after him as well. While some contest his contentions, others doubt the type of English translations made of his German writings. There is a need to take stock of and consolidate the sociologically relevant historical writings of Max Weber in proper perspective. The article raises the following two issues: (a) How can the claim be justified that Max Weber is one of the users of the comparative historical approach rather than one belonging to those using the evolutionary historical approach? (b) What are the specialities of his treatment of history in his methodology and substantive works? It is the specific intention of this article to consolidate the historical materials in the sociological writings of Weber so as to reconstruct his comparative historical approach as against positivist evolutionary history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Sociological Bulletin
The Sociological Bulletin Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Analysing the New Educational Policy in the Context of Higher Education: Where is Gender? Gender, Religion and Higher Education: Strategies of Muslim Women Students in India Eroding Inclusions and Expanding Exclusions: Education During Pandemics Fostering Gender Just and Emancipatory Campuses in HEIs: Interrogating the Role of Gender Cells and ICs Towards Conceptualisation of Safe, Inclusive and Accessible Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1