别尔哥罗德州农村居民道德精神发展趋势(制度分析的经验)

A. Efendiev, A. Gogoleva, E. Balabanova
{"title":"别尔哥罗德州农村居民道德精神发展趋势(制度分析的经验)","authors":"A. Efendiev, A. Gogoleva, E. Balabanova","doi":"10.1080/10610154.2019.1688997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines contradictions in the spiritual development of residents of villages in Belgorod Oblast using data from a panel study conducted in 2000 and 2013. It attempts an institutional analysis of the role of social practices in contemporary processes. The results make it possible to assert that an individual’s actions are determined not so much by their internal attitudes and preferences, as they are by popular practical standards of behavior and the demands and restrictions imposed on the individual from without and on the part of the institutional environment. In particular, the internal contradictory nature of transitional institutions is emphasized. This contradictory nature is expressed in the confrontation between “old” (traditionalist and paternalistic) practices and “new” (competitive and achievement-oriented) practices on the one hand and between “positive” (independence, personal responsibility) and “negative” (moral and legal nihilism) norms underlying the practices of daily social interactions on the other.","PeriodicalId":85546,"journal":{"name":"Sociological research","volume":"58 1","pages":"40 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10610154.2019.1688997","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the Moral and Spiritual Development of Rural Residents in Belgorod Oblast (the Experience of Institutional Analysis)\",\"authors\":\"A. Efendiev, A. Gogoleva, E. Balabanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10610154.2019.1688997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines contradictions in the spiritual development of residents of villages in Belgorod Oblast using data from a panel study conducted in 2000 and 2013. It attempts an institutional analysis of the role of social practices in contemporary processes. The results make it possible to assert that an individual’s actions are determined not so much by their internal attitudes and preferences, as they are by popular practical standards of behavior and the demands and restrictions imposed on the individual from without and on the part of the institutional environment. In particular, the internal contradictory nature of transitional institutions is emphasized. This contradictory nature is expressed in the confrontation between “old” (traditionalist and paternalistic) practices and “new” (competitive and achievement-oriented) practices on the one hand and between “positive” (independence, personal responsibility) and “negative” (moral and legal nihilism) norms underlying the practices of daily social interactions on the other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological research\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10610154.2019.1688997\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2019.1688997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2019.1688997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文使用2000年和2013年进行的小组研究数据,研究了别尔哥罗德州村庄居民精神发展中的矛盾。它试图对社会实践在当代进程中的作用进行制度性分析。这些结果使我们有可能断言,个人的行为与其说是由他们的内部态度和偏好决定的,不如说是由流行的实践行为标准以及外部和制度环境部分对个人施加的要求和限制决定的。特别强调了过渡机构的内部矛盾性质。这种矛盾的本质表现在“旧”(传统主义和家长式)实践与“新”(竞争和成就导向)实践之间的对抗,以及“积极”(独立、个人责任)和“消极”(道德和法律虚无主义)规范之间的对抗,这些规范是日常社会互动实践的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in the Moral and Spiritual Development of Rural Residents in Belgorod Oblast (the Experience of Institutional Analysis)
This article examines contradictions in the spiritual development of residents of villages in Belgorod Oblast using data from a panel study conducted in 2000 and 2013. It attempts an institutional analysis of the role of social practices in contemporary processes. The results make it possible to assert that an individual’s actions are determined not so much by their internal attitudes and preferences, as they are by popular practical standards of behavior and the demands and restrictions imposed on the individual from without and on the part of the institutional environment. In particular, the internal contradictory nature of transitional institutions is emphasized. This contradictory nature is expressed in the confrontation between “old” (traditionalist and paternalistic) practices and “new” (competitive and achievement-oriented) practices on the one hand and between “positive” (independence, personal responsibility) and “negative” (moral and legal nihilism) norms underlying the practices of daily social interactions on the other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z: Youth Under the Rule of Putin A Study of Russia’s Demographic Problems in the Twenty-First Century The Role of the Geographical Factor in the Formation and Development of Human Potential The Social Functions of a Rural Teacher (on the Example of Altai Krai and the Altai Republic) Russian Parental Values in the Cross-Country Context from 1990–1991 to 2017–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1