N20体感电位对急性缺血性脑卒中和血管内取栓患者预后的准确性

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1161/svin.122.000735
A. Martinez‐Piñeiro, G. Lucente, M. Hernández-Pérez, Jordi Cortés, A. Arbex, N. Pérez de la Ossa, A. Ramos‐Fransi, M. Almendrote, M. Millán, M. Gomis, L. Dorado, C. Castaño, S. Remollo, P. Cuadras, A. Garrido, Nicolau Guanyabens, Joaquim Broto, E. López‐Cancio, J. Coll‐Cantí, A. Dávalos
{"title":"N20体感电位对急性缺血性脑卒中和血管内取栓患者预后的准确性","authors":"A. Martinez‐Piñeiro, G. Lucente, M. Hernández-Pérez, Jordi Cortés, A. Arbex, N. Pérez de la Ossa, A. Ramos‐Fransi, M. Almendrote, M. Millán, M. Gomis, L. Dorado, C. Castaño, S. Remollo, P. Cuadras, A. Garrido, Nicolau Guanyabens, Joaquim Broto, E. López‐Cancio, J. Coll‐Cantí, A. Dávalos","doi":"10.1161/svin.122.000735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Somatosensory evoked potentials may add substantial prognostic value in patients with acute ischemic stroke and contribute to the selection of patients who may benefit from revascularization therapies beyond the accepted therapeutic time windows. We aimed to study the prognostic accuracy of the N20 somatosensory evoked potential component of the ischemic hemisphere in patients with anterior large‐vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).\n \n \n \n Presence and amplitude of the N20 response were recorded before and after EVT. Its adjusted predictive value for functional independence (modified Rankin scale score, ≤2) at day 7 was analyzed by binary logistic regression adjusting by age, mean arterial blood pressure, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, and serum glucose. N20 predictive power was compared with that of clinical and imaging models by using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.\n \n \n \n A total of 223 consecutive patients were studied (mean age, 70 years; median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, 18). Somatosensory evoked potential recordings identified the presence of N20 in 110 (49.3%), absence in 58 (26%), and not assessable in 55 patients due to radiofrequency interferences in the angiography room. Before EVT, N20 predicted functional independence with a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 78%–98%) and negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 80%–98%). The adjusted odds ratio for functional independence was 9.9 (95% CI, 3.1–44.6). In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, N20 amplitude showed a higher area under the curve than prehospital or in‐hospital variables, including advanced imaging. Sensitivity increased to 100% (95% CI, 0.85–1) when N20 was present after EVT.\n \n \n \n Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring is a noninvasive and bedside technique that could help eligibility of patients with acute ischemic stroke for EVT and predict functional recovery.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Accuracy of N20 Somatosensory Potential in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Endovascular Thrombectomy\",\"authors\":\"A. Martinez‐Piñeiro, G. Lucente, M. Hernández-Pérez, Jordi Cortés, A. Arbex, N. Pérez de la Ossa, A. Ramos‐Fransi, M. Almendrote, M. Millán, M. Gomis, L. Dorado, C. Castaño, S. Remollo, P. Cuadras, A. Garrido, Nicolau Guanyabens, Joaquim Broto, E. López‐Cancio, J. Coll‐Cantí, A. Dávalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.122.000735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Somatosensory evoked potentials may add substantial prognostic value in patients with acute ischemic stroke and contribute to the selection of patients who may benefit from revascularization therapies beyond the accepted therapeutic time windows. We aimed to study the prognostic accuracy of the N20 somatosensory evoked potential component of the ischemic hemisphere in patients with anterior large‐vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).\\n \\n \\n \\n Presence and amplitude of the N20 response were recorded before and after EVT. Its adjusted predictive value for functional independence (modified Rankin scale score, ≤2) at day 7 was analyzed by binary logistic regression adjusting by age, mean arterial blood pressure, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, and serum glucose. N20 predictive power was compared with that of clinical and imaging models by using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 223 consecutive patients were studied (mean age, 70 years; median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, 18). Somatosensory evoked potential recordings identified the presence of N20 in 110 (49.3%), absence in 58 (26%), and not assessable in 55 patients due to radiofrequency interferences in the angiography room. Before EVT, N20 predicted functional independence with a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 78%–98%) and negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 80%–98%). The adjusted odds ratio for functional independence was 9.9 (95% CI, 3.1–44.6). In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, N20 amplitude showed a higher area under the curve than prehospital or in‐hospital variables, including advanced imaging. Sensitivity increased to 100% (95% CI, 0.85–1) when N20 was present after EVT.\\n \\n \\n \\n Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring is a noninvasive and bedside technique that could help eligibility of patients with acute ischemic stroke for EVT and predict functional recovery.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体感诱发电位可以为急性缺血性中风患者增加实质性的预后价值,并有助于选择可能在可接受的治疗时间窗口之外受益于血运重建治疗的患者。我们旨在研究缺血性半球N20体感诱发电位成分在接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的前大血管闭塞患者中的预后准确性。在EVT前后记录N20反应的存在和幅度。通过年龄、平均动脉血压、国家卫生研究所卒中量表、阿尔伯塔省卒中项目早期CT评分和血糖调整的二元逻辑回归分析其在第7天的功能独立性调整预测值(修正的Rankin量表评分,≤2)。通过使用受试者操作特性曲线分析将N20的预测能力与临床和成像模型的预测能力进行比较。共对223名连续患者进行了研究(平均年龄70岁;美国国家卫生研究所卒中量表评分中位数为18)。体感诱发电位记录显示110例(49.3%)患者存在N20,58例(26%)患者不存在N20。由于血管造影术室的射频干扰,55例患者无法评估N20。在EVT之前,N20预测功能独立性,敏感性为93%(95%CI,78%-98%),阴性预测值为93%(95%CI,80%-98%)。功能独立性的调整比值比为9.9(95%CI,3.1–44.6)。在受试者操作特征曲线分析中,N20振幅在曲线下的面积高于院前或院内变量,包括高级成像。EVT后,当N20存在时,敏感性增加到100%(95%CI,0.85–1)。体感诱发电位监测是一种无创的床边技术,可以帮助急性缺血性卒中患者获得EVT的资格并预测功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Accuracy of N20 Somatosensory Potential in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Endovascular Thrombectomy
Somatosensory evoked potentials may add substantial prognostic value in patients with acute ischemic stroke and contribute to the selection of patients who may benefit from revascularization therapies beyond the accepted therapeutic time windows. We aimed to study the prognostic accuracy of the N20 somatosensory evoked potential component of the ischemic hemisphere in patients with anterior large‐vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Presence and amplitude of the N20 response were recorded before and after EVT. Its adjusted predictive value for functional independence (modified Rankin scale score, ≤2) at day 7 was analyzed by binary logistic regression adjusting by age, mean arterial blood pressure, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, and serum glucose. N20 predictive power was compared with that of clinical and imaging models by using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. A total of 223 consecutive patients were studied (mean age, 70 years; median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, 18). Somatosensory evoked potential recordings identified the presence of N20 in 110 (49.3%), absence in 58 (26%), and not assessable in 55 patients due to radiofrequency interferences in the angiography room. Before EVT, N20 predicted functional independence with a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 78%–98%) and negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 80%–98%). The adjusted odds ratio for functional independence was 9.9 (95% CI, 3.1–44.6). In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, N20 amplitude showed a higher area under the curve than prehospital or in‐hospital variables, including advanced imaging. Sensitivity increased to 100% (95% CI, 0.85–1) when N20 was present after EVT. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring is a noninvasive and bedside technique that could help eligibility of patients with acute ischemic stroke for EVT and predict functional recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of HEmorrhage on CT versus MRI After ThrombEctomy: The HECATE study. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms. Large, Wide-Neck, Side-Wall Aneurysm Treatment in Canines Using NeuroCURE: A Novel Liquid Embolic. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual CLOTS Meeting: CLOTS 7.0, Madrid, Spain Catching Up With Time: Endovascular Treatment Beyond 24 Hours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1