持续输注氯胺酮用于重症监护病房机械通气成人的镇静:范围回顾

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1177/17511437231182507
Nicholas David Richards, William Weatherhead, Simon Howell, Mark Bellamy, Ruben Mujica-Mota
{"title":"持续输注氯胺酮用于重症监护病房机械通气成人的镇静:范围回顾","authors":"Nicholas David Richards, William Weatherhead, Simon Howell, Mark Bellamy, Ruben Mujica-Mota","doi":"10.1177/17511437231182507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and often live-saving intervention on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The optimisation of sedation to mechanical ventilation is fundamental, and inappropriate sedation has been associated with worse outcomes. This scoping review has been designed to answer the question '<i>What is known about the use of ketamine as a continuous infusion to provide sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit, and what are the gaps in the evidence?'</i></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was designed using the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Data were extracted and reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches of electronic databases (PubMed, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science) produced 726 results; 45 citations were identified for further eligibility assessment, an additional five studies were identified through keyword searches, and 12 through searching reference lists. Of these 62 studies, 27 studies were included in the final review: 6 case reports/case series, 11 retrospective cohort/observational studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 9 prospective randomised studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a lack of high-quality well-designed studies investigating the use of continuous ketamine sedation on ICU. The available data suggests this intervention is safe and well tolerated, however this is of very low certainty given the poor quality of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"59-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous infusion ketamine for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas David Richards, William Weatherhead, Simon Howell, Mark Bellamy, Ruben Mujica-Mota\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17511437231182507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and often live-saving intervention on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The optimisation of sedation to mechanical ventilation is fundamental, and inappropriate sedation has been associated with worse outcomes. This scoping review has been designed to answer the question '<i>What is known about the use of ketamine as a continuous infusion to provide sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit, and what are the gaps in the evidence?'</i></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was designed using the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Data were extracted and reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches of electronic databases (PubMed, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science) produced 726 results; 45 citations were identified for further eligibility assessment, an additional five studies were identified through keyword searches, and 12 through searching reference lists. Of these 62 studies, 27 studies were included in the final review: 6 case reports/case series, 11 retrospective cohort/observational studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 9 prospective randomised studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a lack of high-quality well-designed studies investigating the use of continuous ketamine sedation on ICU. The available data suggests this intervention is safe and well tolerated, however this is of very low certainty given the poor quality of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"59-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437231182507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437231182507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机械通气(MV)是重症监护病房(ICU)常见的救命干预手段。优化镇静对机械通气是基本的,不适当的镇静与较差的结果相关。本综述旨在回答以下问题:“对于重症监护病房中使用氯胺酮作为持续输注以提供镇静作用,我们知道些什么?证据中的空白是什么?”该方案使用PRISMA-ScR检查表和JBI证据合成手册进行设计。数据由至少两名审稿人提取和审查。对电子数据库(PubMed, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science)的搜索产生了726个结果;通过关键词检索确定了另外5项研究,通过参考文献列表检索确定了12项研究。在这62项研究中,有27项研究被纳入最终综述:6项病例报告/病例系列,11项回顾性队列/观察性研究,1项前瞻性队列研究,9项前瞻性随机研究。我们发现缺乏高质量的精心设计的研究来调查在ICU中使用持续氯胺酮镇静的情况。现有数据表明,这种干预是安全且耐受性良好的,然而,由于证据质量较差,这是非常低的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous infusion ketamine for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.

Introduction: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and often live-saving intervention on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The optimisation of sedation to mechanical ventilation is fundamental, and inappropriate sedation has been associated with worse outcomes. This scoping review has been designed to answer the question 'What is known about the use of ketamine as a continuous infusion to provide sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit, and what are the gaps in the evidence?'

Methods: The protocol was designed using the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Data were extracted and reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers.

Results: Searches of electronic databases (PubMed, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science) produced 726 results; 45 citations were identified for further eligibility assessment, an additional five studies were identified through keyword searches, and 12 through searching reference lists. Of these 62 studies, 27 studies were included in the final review: 6 case reports/case series, 11 retrospective cohort/observational studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 9 prospective randomised studies.

Conclusion: We found a lack of high-quality well-designed studies investigating the use of continuous ketamine sedation on ICU. The available data suggests this intervention is safe and well tolerated, however this is of very low certainty given the poor quality of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units. In vivo assessment of a modification of a domiciliary ventilator which reduces oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients. Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey. Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial. Should viscoelastic testing be a standard point-of-care test on all intensive care units?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1