育儿协调员:西班牙司法推理分析

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accion Psicologica Pub Date : 2017-12-19 DOI:10.5944/AP.14.2.21346
Francisca Fariña, Vanesa Parada, M. Novo, Dolores Seijo
{"title":"育儿协调员:西班牙司法推理分析","authors":"Francisca Fariña, Vanesa Parada, M. Novo, Dolores Seijo","doi":"10.5944/AP.14.2.21346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A parenting coordinator (PC) is a professional who inter­venes in judicial contexts involving high conflict parental litigation in order to safeguard the child’s best interest, as well as dealing with issues concerning coparenting. This new role has been the object of specific directives from international professional associations such as the Asso­ciation of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC, 2006), and the American Psychological Association (APA, 2012), who have established guidelines for professional practice. The figure of the PC has been introduced only recently in Spain, with Catalonia being the first autono­mous communities to do so. Bearing these circumstances in mind, this study aims to assess the impact of this new figure on judicial judgements by examining both the legal reasoning, and the judges’ rationale guiding the professional practice of this figure. Judicial judgements from the CENDOJ database involving the figure of the Parenting coordinator were analysed. The results ob­tained shed light on the legal reasoning cited by judicial decision-makers in their judgements and the criteria em­ployed to justify this new figure and its correspondence with international guidelines. Judgements were found to be grounded on legal reasoning and the criteria was es­sentially in accordance with guidelines proposed by in­ternational associations. Nevertheless, legal decision-makers must further their understanding concerning the role of the CP in order to assist families with high con­flict parents to ensure positive coparenting.","PeriodicalId":43927,"journal":{"name":"Accion Psicologica","volume":"14 1","pages":"157-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/AP.14.2.21346","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parenting Coordinator: An Analysis of Spanish Judicial Reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Francisca Fariña, Vanesa Parada, M. Novo, Dolores Seijo\",\"doi\":\"10.5944/AP.14.2.21346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A parenting coordinator (PC) is a professional who inter­venes in judicial contexts involving high conflict parental litigation in order to safeguard the child’s best interest, as well as dealing with issues concerning coparenting. This new role has been the object of specific directives from international professional associations such as the Asso­ciation of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC, 2006), and the American Psychological Association (APA, 2012), who have established guidelines for professional practice. The figure of the PC has been introduced only recently in Spain, with Catalonia being the first autono­mous communities to do so. Bearing these circumstances in mind, this study aims to assess the impact of this new figure on judicial judgements by examining both the legal reasoning, and the judges’ rationale guiding the professional practice of this figure. Judicial judgements from the CENDOJ database involving the figure of the Parenting coordinator were analysed. The results ob­tained shed light on the legal reasoning cited by judicial decision-makers in their judgements and the criteria em­ployed to justify this new figure and its correspondence with international guidelines. Judgements were found to be grounded on legal reasoning and the criteria was es­sentially in accordance with guidelines proposed by in­ternational associations. Nevertheless, legal decision-makers must further their understanding concerning the role of the CP in order to assist families with high con­flict parents to ensure positive coparenting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accion Psicologica\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"157-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/AP.14.2.21346\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accion Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5944/AP.14.2.21346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accion Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/AP.14.2.21346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

育儿协调员(PC)是一名专业人员,在涉及高度冲突的父母诉讼的司法环境中进行干预,以维护孩子的最大利益,并处理与共付费用有关的问题。这一新角色一直是国际专业协会的具体指示对象,如家庭与调解法院协会(AFCC,2006)和美国心理协会(APA,2012),它们制定了专业实践指南。PC的数字最近才在西班牙引入,加泰罗尼亚是第一个这样做的自治社区。考虑到这些情况,本研究旨在通过审查法律推理和法官指导该数字专业实践的基本原理来评估这一新数字对司法判决的影响。分析了CENDOJ数据库中涉及育儿协调员数字的司法判决。所获得的结果揭示了司法决策者在判决中引用的法律推理,以及他们为证明这一新数字及其与国际准则的一致性而采用的标准。判决基于法律推理,标准基本符合国际协会提出的指导方针。尽管如此,法律决策者必须进一步理解CP的作用,以帮助父母冲突严重的家庭确保积极的共付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parenting Coordinator: An Analysis of Spanish Judicial Reasoning
A parenting coordinator (PC) is a professional who inter­venes in judicial contexts involving high conflict parental litigation in order to safeguard the child’s best interest, as well as dealing with issues concerning coparenting. This new role has been the object of specific directives from international professional associations such as the Asso­ciation of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC, 2006), and the American Psychological Association (APA, 2012), who have established guidelines for professional practice. The figure of the PC has been introduced only recently in Spain, with Catalonia being the first autono­mous communities to do so. Bearing these circumstances in mind, this study aims to assess the impact of this new figure on judicial judgements by examining both the legal reasoning, and the judges’ rationale guiding the professional practice of this figure. Judicial judgements from the CENDOJ database involving the figure of the Parenting coordinator were analysed. The results ob­tained shed light on the legal reasoning cited by judicial decision-makers in their judgements and the criteria em­ployed to justify this new figure and its correspondence with international guidelines. Judgements were found to be grounded on legal reasoning and the criteria was es­sentially in accordance with guidelines proposed by in­ternational associations. Nevertheless, legal decision-makers must further their understanding concerning the role of the CP in order to assist families with high con­flict parents to ensure positive coparenting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accion Psicologica
Accion Psicologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Autocuidado frente a las enfermedades de transmisión sexual en universitarios de México estigma hacia el trastorno mental grave (TMG) en profesionales: una revisión sistemática Apoyo social percibido como factor protector de la ideación suicida en embarazadas Representaciones y prácticas en torno a la implementación de la educación sexual integral en una institución educativa de nivel primario de la ciudad de Río Cuarto (Córdoba, Argentina) Atención centrada en la persona en residencias para demencia: influencia de variables organizacionales y del staff. Una revisión narrativa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1