解决在线和混合STEM学习与基础设计的挑战

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2022-10-30 DOI:10.14742/ajet.7620
Yunjeong Chang, Eunbae Lee
{"title":"解决在线和混合STEM学习与基础设计的挑战","authors":"Yunjeong Chang, Eunbae Lee","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning became a major alternative to college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in postsecondary education. Faculty members, although subject matter experts, often lack pedagogical knowledge and training on how to effectively teach new generations of students online, or incorporate appropriate technologies. Faculty teaching online courses needed a new guiding framework to balance domain goals and emerging technologies. We present grounded design for STEM courses to align domain goals and instructional methods and technologies while reflecting instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and addressing cultural and pragmatic issues. It is critical to provide students with aligned STEM learning experience and engagement via defensible theories and research-evidenced pedagogy in online and blended courses while technological, cultural, and pragmatic considerations are also addressed. We suggest grounded design as the conceptual and design framework for designing online and blended courses and discuss the assumptions, approaches, and examples. We provide practical guidelines to apply grounded design to online and blended learning environments and suggest future research. This article can assist both novice and seasoned STEM faculty to connect theory and research to teaching practices and optimise their online and blended courses.\nImplications for practice\n\nUniversity STEM instructors can use grounded design framework for online, blended, and technology-enhanced teaching.\nInstructors should begin the course design by aligning the domain goals with optimal psychological and pedagogical foundations.\nWhen choosing technology to support online learning, instructors should align it with learning goals and needs of students, and consider cultural and pragmatic foundations.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the challenges of online and blended STEM learning with grounded design\",\"authors\":\"Yunjeong Chang, Eunbae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/ajet.7620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning became a major alternative to college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in postsecondary education. Faculty members, although subject matter experts, often lack pedagogical knowledge and training on how to effectively teach new generations of students online, or incorporate appropriate technologies. Faculty teaching online courses needed a new guiding framework to balance domain goals and emerging technologies. We present grounded design for STEM courses to align domain goals and instructional methods and technologies while reflecting instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and addressing cultural and pragmatic issues. It is critical to provide students with aligned STEM learning experience and engagement via defensible theories and research-evidenced pedagogy in online and blended courses while technological, cultural, and pragmatic considerations are also addressed. We suggest grounded design as the conceptual and design framework for designing online and blended courses and discuss the assumptions, approaches, and examples. We provide practical guidelines to apply grounded design to online and blended learning environments and suggest future research. This article can assist both novice and seasoned STEM faculty to connect theory and research to teaching practices and optimise their online and blended courses.\\nImplications for practice\\n\\nUniversity STEM instructors can use grounded design framework for online, blended, and technology-enhanced teaching.\\nInstructors should begin the course design by aligning the domain goals with optimal psychological and pedagogical foundations.\\nWhen choosing technology to support online learning, instructors should align it with learning goals and needs of students, and consider cultural and pragmatic foundations.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7620\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,在线学习成为高等教育中大学科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)课程的主要替代方案。教师虽然是学科专家,但往往缺乏教学知识和培训,不知道如何有效地在线教授新一代学生,或采用适当的技术。教授在线课程的教师需要一个新的指导框架来平衡领域目标和新兴技术。我们提出了STEM课程的接地设计,以协调领域目标和教学方法和技术,同时反映教师的教学信念,并解决文化和实用问题。在在线和混合课程中,通过可辩护的理论和研究证明的教学法,为学生提供一致的STEM学习经验和参与是至关重要的,同时也要考虑技术、文化和实用主义方面的考虑。我们建议将基础设计作为设计在线和混合课程的概念和设计框架,并讨论假设、方法和示例。我们提供实用的指导方针,将接地设计应用于在线和混合学习环境,并建议未来的研究。本文可以帮助新手和经验丰富的STEM教师将理论和研究与教学实践联系起来,并优化他们的在线和混合课程。对实践的启示大学STEM教师可以使用基于基础的设计框架进行在线、混合和技术增强的教学。教师应该将领域目标与最佳的心理和教学基础结合起来,开始课程设计。在选择支持在线学习的技术时,教师应使其与学生的学习目标和需求保持一致,并考虑文化和实用基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing the challenges of online and blended STEM learning with grounded design
During the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning became a major alternative to college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in postsecondary education. Faculty members, although subject matter experts, often lack pedagogical knowledge and training on how to effectively teach new generations of students online, or incorporate appropriate technologies. Faculty teaching online courses needed a new guiding framework to balance domain goals and emerging technologies. We present grounded design for STEM courses to align domain goals and instructional methods and technologies while reflecting instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and addressing cultural and pragmatic issues. It is critical to provide students with aligned STEM learning experience and engagement via defensible theories and research-evidenced pedagogy in online and blended courses while technological, cultural, and pragmatic considerations are also addressed. We suggest grounded design as the conceptual and design framework for designing online and blended courses and discuss the assumptions, approaches, and examples. We provide practical guidelines to apply grounded design to online and blended learning environments and suggest future research. This article can assist both novice and seasoned STEM faculty to connect theory and research to teaching practices and optimise their online and blended courses. Implications for practice University STEM instructors can use grounded design framework for online, blended, and technology-enhanced teaching. Instructors should begin the course design by aligning the domain goals with optimal psychological and pedagogical foundations. When choosing technology to support online learning, instructors should align it with learning goals and needs of students, and consider cultural and pragmatic foundations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to sustain a centralised approach to learning design Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education Access and Participation: The use of Technologies as tools for Inclusion by Spanish University Lecturers The effects of visualisation literacy and data storytelling dashboards on teachers’ cognitive load Students got mail: Do students read semi-tailored emails and what is the impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1