有贝塔异常吗?——来自印度的证据

IF 2 0 ECONOMICS Annals of Financial Economics Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1142/s2010495222500208
Vinay Khandelwal, Varun Chotia
{"title":"有贝塔异常吗?——来自印度的证据","authors":"Vinay Khandelwal, Varun Chotia","doi":"10.1142/s2010495222500208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the Indian equity market for the presence of a beta anomaly. A beta anomaly occurs when the additional market risk taken by an investor is not rewarded. Academic literature shows mixed evidence on whether the market rewards risk-takers or not for the additional risk taken. Using a sample of monthly returns of 265 companies during a period of 240 months from January 2000 to December 2019, the authors test the Indian equity market for the presence of an anomaly. A decile descriptive analysis shows a positive relationship between market risk and returns, and a negative relationship between company-specific risk and returns. A two-stage Fama–MacBeth (FMB) regression procedure is employed to empirically test for the relationship between beta and expected returns. The findings refute the presence of a beta anomaly in the Indian capital market. Also, the study concludes that a linear model of slope-intercept form is enough to explain the beta and expected returns’ relationship. The findings benefit investment managers and wealth advisors by explaining the market risk and expected returns relationship.","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS THERE A BETA ANOMALY? — EVIDENCE FROM THE INDIA\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Khandelwal, Varun Chotia\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2010495222500208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the Indian equity market for the presence of a beta anomaly. A beta anomaly occurs when the additional market risk taken by an investor is not rewarded. Academic literature shows mixed evidence on whether the market rewards risk-takers or not for the additional risk taken. Using a sample of monthly returns of 265 companies during a period of 240 months from January 2000 to December 2019, the authors test the Indian equity market for the presence of an anomaly. A decile descriptive analysis shows a positive relationship between market risk and returns, and a negative relationship between company-specific risk and returns. A two-stage Fama–MacBeth (FMB) regression procedure is employed to empirically test for the relationship between beta and expected returns. The findings refute the presence of a beta anomaly in the Indian capital market. Also, the study concludes that a linear model of slope-intercept form is enough to explain the beta and expected returns’ relationship. The findings benefit investment managers and wealth advisors by explaining the market risk and expected returns relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495222500208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495222500208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文调查了印度股票市场是否存在贝塔异常。当投资者承担的额外市场风险没有得到回报时,就会出现贝塔异常。关于市场是否会因承担的额外风险而奖励风险承担者,学术文献显示了喜忧参半的证据。作者使用2000年1月至2019年12月240个月期间265家公司的月度回报样本,测试了印度股市是否存在异常。十分位数描述性分析显示,市场风险和回报之间存在正相关关系,而公司特定风险和收益之间存在负相关关系。采用两阶段Fama–MacBeth(FMB)回归程序对贝塔系数和预期收益之间的关系进行实证检验。研究结果驳斥了印度资本市场存在贝塔异常的说法。此外,该研究得出结论,斜率截距形式的线性模型足以解释贝塔和预期收益的关系。研究结果通过解释市场风险和预期回报关系,使投资经理和财富顾问受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IS THERE A BETA ANOMALY? — EVIDENCE FROM THE INDIA
This paper investigates the Indian equity market for the presence of a beta anomaly. A beta anomaly occurs when the additional market risk taken by an investor is not rewarded. Academic literature shows mixed evidence on whether the market rewards risk-takers or not for the additional risk taken. Using a sample of monthly returns of 265 companies during a period of 240 months from January 2000 to December 2019, the authors test the Indian equity market for the presence of an anomaly. A decile descriptive analysis shows a positive relationship between market risk and returns, and a negative relationship between company-specific risk and returns. A two-stage Fama–MacBeth (FMB) regression procedure is employed to empirically test for the relationship between beta and expected returns. The findings refute the presence of a beta anomaly in the Indian capital market. Also, the study concludes that a linear model of slope-intercept form is enough to explain the beta and expected returns’ relationship. The findings benefit investment managers and wealth advisors by explaining the market risk and expected returns relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
55.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Remittance Inflows Cause the Dutch Disease in the Financial Sector? The Role of Financial Risk and Human Capital Factors Affecting the Crude Oil Prices Volatility: A Case Study of the USA, China, Japan, Germany and India The Emerging Stock Markets and Their Asymmetric Response to Infectious Disease Equity Market Volatility (ID-EMV) Index Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Rising Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption and Climate Risk Development Finance: Evidence from BRICS Countries Potential Welfare Gains from Optimal Macro Hedging for Oil Exporters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1