{"title":"有贝塔异常吗?——来自印度的证据","authors":"Vinay Khandelwal, Varun Chotia","doi":"10.1142/s2010495222500208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the Indian equity market for the presence of a beta anomaly. A beta anomaly occurs when the additional market risk taken by an investor is not rewarded. Academic literature shows mixed evidence on whether the market rewards risk-takers or not for the additional risk taken. Using a sample of monthly returns of 265 companies during a period of 240 months from January 2000 to December 2019, the authors test the Indian equity market for the presence of an anomaly. A decile descriptive analysis shows a positive relationship between market risk and returns, and a negative relationship between company-specific risk and returns. A two-stage Fama–MacBeth (FMB) regression procedure is employed to empirically test for the relationship between beta and expected returns. The findings refute the presence of a beta anomaly in the Indian capital market. Also, the study concludes that a linear model of slope-intercept form is enough to explain the beta and expected returns’ relationship. The findings benefit investment managers and wealth advisors by explaining the market risk and expected returns relationship.","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS THERE A BETA ANOMALY? — EVIDENCE FROM THE INDIA\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Khandelwal, Varun Chotia\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2010495222500208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the Indian equity market for the presence of a beta anomaly. A beta anomaly occurs when the additional market risk taken by an investor is not rewarded. Academic literature shows mixed evidence on whether the market rewards risk-takers or not for the additional risk taken. Using a sample of monthly returns of 265 companies during a period of 240 months from January 2000 to December 2019, the authors test the Indian equity market for the presence of an anomaly. A decile descriptive analysis shows a positive relationship between market risk and returns, and a negative relationship between company-specific risk and returns. A two-stage Fama–MacBeth (FMB) regression procedure is employed to empirically test for the relationship between beta and expected returns. The findings refute the presence of a beta anomaly in the Indian capital market. Also, the study concludes that a linear model of slope-intercept form is enough to explain the beta and expected returns’ relationship. The findings benefit investment managers and wealth advisors by explaining the market risk and expected returns relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495222500208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495222500208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
IS THERE A BETA ANOMALY? — EVIDENCE FROM THE INDIA
This paper investigates the Indian equity market for the presence of a beta anomaly. A beta anomaly occurs when the additional market risk taken by an investor is not rewarded. Academic literature shows mixed evidence on whether the market rewards risk-takers or not for the additional risk taken. Using a sample of monthly returns of 265 companies during a period of 240 months from January 2000 to December 2019, the authors test the Indian equity market for the presence of an anomaly. A decile descriptive analysis shows a positive relationship between market risk and returns, and a negative relationship between company-specific risk and returns. A two-stage Fama–MacBeth (FMB) regression procedure is employed to empirically test for the relationship between beta and expected returns. The findings refute the presence of a beta anomaly in the Indian capital market. Also, the study concludes that a linear model of slope-intercept form is enough to explain the beta and expected returns’ relationship. The findings benefit investment managers and wealth advisors by explaining the market risk and expected returns relationship.