佛罗里达州的选举日

Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1353/man.0.0071
W. White
{"title":"佛罗里达州的选举日","authors":"W. White","doi":"10.1353/man.0.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the presidential election in florida has revealed the state of democracy in America on at least three occasions. Contested Florida ballots played a key role in the election of 1876 that ultimately spelled the end of Reconstruction. More recently, the 2000 Bush-Gore debacle cast a troubling shadow over the nation. People from all walks of life debated the bewildering chain of events that culminated with the Supreme Court’s dramatic intervention in the contested election. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights noted, “The state of Florida’s electoral process took center stage as the world paused to observe the unfolding drama of identifying the next President of the United States.”2 Most accounts of the crisis missed the decisive factor in the election’s outcome: the disfranchisement of many African American, Latino, and Haitian voters under dubious pretenses.3 After sifting through one hundred thousand pages of documents and listening to the testimony of more than one hundred people, the Commission on Civil Rights concluded: “Voting is the language of our democracy. As the Supreme Court observed, ‘no right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live.’ It is clear that many people in Florida were denied this precious right.”4","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Election Day in Florida\",\"authors\":\"W. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/man.0.0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the presidential election in florida has revealed the state of democracy in America on at least three occasions. Contested Florida ballots played a key role in the election of 1876 that ultimately spelled the end of Reconstruction. More recently, the 2000 Bush-Gore debacle cast a troubling shadow over the nation. People from all walks of life debated the bewildering chain of events that culminated with the Supreme Court’s dramatic intervention in the contested election. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights noted, “The state of Florida’s electoral process took center stage as the world paused to observe the unfolding drama of identifying the next President of the United States.”2 Most accounts of the crisis missed the decisive factor in the election’s outcome: the disfranchisement of many African American, Latino, and Haitian voters under dubious pretenses.3 After sifting through one hundred thousand pages of documents and listening to the testimony of more than one hundred people, the Commission on Civil Rights concluded: “Voting is the language of our democracy. As the Supreme Court observed, ‘no right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live.’ It is clear that many people in Florida were denied this precious right.”4\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/man.0.0071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/man.0.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

佛罗里达州的总统选举至少三次揭示了美国的民主状况。佛罗里达州的选票在1876年的选举中发挥了关键作用,最终标志着重建的结束。最近,2000年布什-戈尔的失败给这个国家蒙上了一层令人不安的阴影。各界人士就一系列令人困惑的事件展开了辩论,最终最高法院戏剧性地干预了有争议的选举。美国民权委员会指出,“佛罗里达州的选举进程占据了中心舞台,全世界都停下来观察确定下一任美国总统的戏剧性事件。”2大多数关于这场危机的报道都忽略了选举结果的决定性因素:许多非裔美国人、拉丁裔美国人、,3在筛选了10万页的文件并听取了100多人的证词后,民权委员会得出结论:“投票是我们民主的语言。正如最高法院所说,‘在一个自由的国家,没有什么权利比在制定法律的人的选举中有发言权更珍贵了。作为好公民,我们必须生活在法律之下。’很明显,佛罗里达州的许多人被剥夺了这一宝贵的权利。”4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Election Day in Florida
the presidential election in florida has revealed the state of democracy in America on at least three occasions. Contested Florida ballots played a key role in the election of 1876 that ultimately spelled the end of Reconstruction. More recently, the 2000 Bush-Gore debacle cast a troubling shadow over the nation. People from all walks of life debated the bewildering chain of events that culminated with the Supreme Court’s dramatic intervention in the contested election. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights noted, “The state of Florida’s electoral process took center stage as the world paused to observe the unfolding drama of identifying the next President of the United States.”2 Most accounts of the crisis missed the decisive factor in the election’s outcome: the disfranchisement of many African American, Latino, and Haitian voters under dubious pretenses.3 After sifting through one hundred thousand pages of documents and listening to the testimony of more than one hundred people, the Commission on Civil Rights concluded: “Voting is the language of our democracy. As the Supreme Court observed, ‘no right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live.’ It is clear that many people in Florida were denied this precious right.”4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1