书面语篇中的性别与语言差异研究

Hazim Alkhrisheh, Feisal Aziez, Taisir Alkhrisheh
{"title":"书面语篇中的性别与语言差异研究","authors":"Hazim Alkhrisheh, Feisal Aziez, Taisir Alkhrisheh","doi":"10.33603/RILL.V2I2.2028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at investigating gender differences in written texts using Halliday’s framework about the functions of language. Halliday claimed that females’ writing style is, what he described as, ‘involved’ while males’ writing style is more ‘informative’. The results of the study do not confirm Halliday’s assumptions about gender differences in writing. No significant differences were found between males and females in the frequencies of the use of nouns, prepositions, numerals and modifiers. The only significant difference that was found is the use of pronouns, which is not enough to account for the assumptions. This paper also aims to investigate the differences between Arabic and English in the average sentence length, lexical density, and readability. To measure readability, the Gunning-Fog index formula was used. The results show that there was no significant difference between Arabic and English in the average sentence length, but there were significant differences in lexical density and readability.","PeriodicalId":33592,"journal":{"name":"Research and Innovation in Language Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A STUDY ON GENDER AND LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES IN WRITTEN TEXTS\",\"authors\":\"Hazim Alkhrisheh, Feisal Aziez, Taisir Alkhrisheh\",\"doi\":\"10.33603/RILL.V2I2.2028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims at investigating gender differences in written texts using Halliday’s framework about the functions of language. Halliday claimed that females’ writing style is, what he described as, ‘involved’ while males’ writing style is more ‘informative’. The results of the study do not confirm Halliday’s assumptions about gender differences in writing. No significant differences were found between males and females in the frequencies of the use of nouns, prepositions, numerals and modifiers. The only significant difference that was found is the use of pronouns, which is not enough to account for the assumptions. This paper also aims to investigate the differences between Arabic and English in the average sentence length, lexical density, and readability. To measure readability, the Gunning-Fog index formula was used. The results show that there was no significant difference between Arabic and English in the average sentence length, but there were significant differences in lexical density and readability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Innovation in Language Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Innovation in Language Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33603/RILL.V2I2.2028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Innovation in Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33603/RILL.V2I2.2028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在运用韩礼德的语言功能框架探讨书面语篇中的性别差异。韩礼德称,女性的写作风格是“涉及”的,而男性的写作风格则是“信息丰富”的。这项研究的结果并不能证实韩礼德关于写作中性别差异的假设。男性和女性在名词、介词、数词和修饰语的使用频率上没有显著差异。唯一发现的显著差异是代词的使用,这不足以解释这些假设。本文还探讨了阿拉伯语和英语在平均句长、词汇密度和可读性方面的差异。为了衡量可读性,使用了Gunning-Fog指数公式。结果表明,阿拉伯文和英文在平均句长上差异不显著,但在词汇密度和可读性上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A STUDY ON GENDER AND LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES IN WRITTEN TEXTS
This study aims at investigating gender differences in written texts using Halliday’s framework about the functions of language. Halliday claimed that females’ writing style is, what he described as, ‘involved’ while males’ writing style is more ‘informative’. The results of the study do not confirm Halliday’s assumptions about gender differences in writing. No significant differences were found between males and females in the frequencies of the use of nouns, prepositions, numerals and modifiers. The only significant difference that was found is the use of pronouns, which is not enough to account for the assumptions. This paper also aims to investigate the differences between Arabic and English in the average sentence length, lexical density, and readability. To measure readability, the Gunning-Fog index formula was used. The results show that there was no significant difference between Arabic and English in the average sentence length, but there were significant differences in lexical density and readability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Teachers and Learners’ Perceptions of Online Corrective Feedback through Multiple Platforms Google Classroom as A Web-based Instruction in Teaching English Writing and Speaking during Covid-19 Conceptual Metaphor in Japanese Idiom with the Word Mizu ‘Water” Using Problem-Based Learning to Develop EFL Pre-service Teachers’ Intercultural Awareness Lexical Hedges in Reflecting Gender Differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1