{"title":"从个体到种群:人与异种的相互作用如何影响坐等捕食者的栖息地选择","authors":"Vesna Klokočovnik, Tadeja Bantan, Dušan Devetak","doi":"10.1111/eth.13387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Species have different requirements for the habitat in which they live, depending on various biotic and abiotic factors. For sedentary predators such as antlion larvae, both factors are essential. In this study, we examined the preferred habitat choice concerning two abiotic factors, i.e., substrate and illumination, in two pit-building antlions, <i>Euroleon nostras</i> and <i>Myrmeleon formicarius</i>, to determine whether choice changes during con- or heterospecific interactions. Both species preferred medium sand grains, i.e., 230–540 μm but differed in their choice of illumination. <i>E. nostras</i> preferred shade, while <i>M. formicarius</i> chose the illuminated part of the container. However, the choice changed, especially for <i>M. formicarius</i> during interactions with another individual. Abiotic factors took precedence over biotic factors in the choice of <i>E. nostras</i> when interactions were involved<i>. M. formicarius</i> avoided interactions and built pits in less suitable conditions when suitable locations were already occupied. The results can be applied to the species' natural habitat and life traits. We can confirm that <i>E. nostras</i> is a more competitive species when it comes to providing the most suitable abiotic conditions in the habitat for pit construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13387","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From individuals to populations: How homo- and heterospecific interactions influence habitat selection in a sit-and-wait predator\",\"authors\":\"Vesna Klokočovnik, Tadeja Bantan, Dušan Devetak\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.13387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Species have different requirements for the habitat in which they live, depending on various biotic and abiotic factors. For sedentary predators such as antlion larvae, both factors are essential. In this study, we examined the preferred habitat choice concerning two abiotic factors, i.e., substrate and illumination, in two pit-building antlions, <i>Euroleon nostras</i> and <i>Myrmeleon formicarius</i>, to determine whether choice changes during con- or heterospecific interactions. Both species preferred medium sand grains, i.e., 230–540 μm but differed in their choice of illumination. <i>E. nostras</i> preferred shade, while <i>M. formicarius</i> chose the illuminated part of the container. However, the choice changed, especially for <i>M. formicarius</i> during interactions with another individual. Abiotic factors took precedence over biotic factors in the choice of <i>E. nostras</i> when interactions were involved<i>. M. formicarius</i> avoided interactions and built pits in less suitable conditions when suitable locations were already occupied. The results can be applied to the species' natural habitat and life traits. We can confirm that <i>E. nostras</i> is a more competitive species when it comes to providing the most suitable abiotic conditions in the habitat for pit construction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13387\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13387\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From individuals to populations: How homo- and heterospecific interactions influence habitat selection in a sit-and-wait predator
Species have different requirements for the habitat in which they live, depending on various biotic and abiotic factors. For sedentary predators such as antlion larvae, both factors are essential. In this study, we examined the preferred habitat choice concerning two abiotic factors, i.e., substrate and illumination, in two pit-building antlions, Euroleon nostras and Myrmeleon formicarius, to determine whether choice changes during con- or heterospecific interactions. Both species preferred medium sand grains, i.e., 230–540 μm but differed in their choice of illumination. E. nostras preferred shade, while M. formicarius chose the illuminated part of the container. However, the choice changed, especially for M. formicarius during interactions with another individual. Abiotic factors took precedence over biotic factors in the choice of E. nostras when interactions were involved. M. formicarius avoided interactions and built pits in less suitable conditions when suitable locations were already occupied. The results can be applied to the species' natural habitat and life traits. We can confirm that E. nostras is a more competitive species when it comes to providing the most suitable abiotic conditions in the habitat for pit construction.
期刊介绍:
International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.