气候变化世界中碳定价的限制

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Direito e Praxis Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55342

Veronica Kober Gonçalves, V. D. Vecchia

{"title":"气候变化世界中碳定价的限制","authors":"Veronica Kober Gonçalves, V. D. Vecchia","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the last two decades, carbon pricing has contributed on consolidating a normative consensus of responding to the problem of climate change with economic instruments. The article explores the consensus about carbon pricing and its neoliberal rationality and argues that this turn to economics helps to explain its limited results, as it ties climate policies to private interests, despite of its poor outcomes.","PeriodicalId":54059,"journal":{"name":"Direito e Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limits of carbon pricing in a climate-changing world\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Kober Gonçalves, V. D. Vecchia\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the last two decades, carbon pricing has contributed on consolidating a normative consensus of responding to the problem of climate change with economic instruments. The article explores the consensus about carbon pricing and its neoliberal rationality and argues that this turn to economics helps to explain its limited results, as it ties climate policies to private interests, despite of its poor outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Direito e Praxis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Direito e Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Direito e Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在过去的二十年里，碳定价有助于巩固用经济工具应对气候变化问题的规范共识。这篇文章探讨了关于碳定价及其新自由主义理性的共识，并认为这种转向经济学有助于解释其有限的结果，因为它将气候政策与私人利益联系在一起，尽管结果不佳。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Limits of carbon pricing in a climate-changing world

Abstract In the last two decades, carbon pricing has contributed on consolidating a normative consensus of responding to the problem of climate change with economic instruments. The article explores the consensus about carbon pricing and its neoliberal rationality and argues that this turn to economics helps to explain its limited results, as it ties climate policies to private interests, despite of its poor outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Direito e Praxis LAW-

自引率

50.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks