多发性硬化症患者的直接和间接护理:提供者的负担和门户信息的影响

Q1 Nursing International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2022-102
Rola Mahmoud, Katie Callahan, Doug Schell, Suzanne Carron, Salim Chahin
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者的直接和间接护理:提供者的负担和门户信息的影响","authors":"Rola Mahmoud, Katie Callahan, Doug Schell, Suzanne Carron, Salim Chahin","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) indirect patient-care time is often underreported and uncompensated. Data on time spent on indirect and direct care by MS providers is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was designed to understand the practice patterns among MS providers in the United States, including time spent on direct and indirect patient care, as well as managing electronic medical record portal messages. The National MS Society and the American Academy of Neurology facilitated the distribution of the survey to MS providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most providers spent at least 1 hour on new and at least 30 minutes on follow-up direct patient care. For indirect patient care, 77% of providers spent more than 1 hour and 57% spent more than 2 hours per day. While some providers have support staff to help with portal messages, many do not have protected time or compensation for portal messages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple sclerosis providers spent a higher-than-average time on direct and indirect patient care tasks, including portal messages, and most lack protected time or compensation for portal messages. These results highlight the potential impact of indirect patient care (notably portal messages) on provider workload and burnout. Better support, protected time and/or compensation for indirect patient care can help ease physician burden and decrease burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"1 1","pages":"13-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10779709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct and Indirect Care of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Burden on Providers and Impact of Portal Messages.\",\"authors\":\"Rola Mahmoud, Katie Callahan, Doug Schell, Suzanne Carron, Salim Chahin\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) indirect patient-care time is often underreported and uncompensated. Data on time spent on indirect and direct care by MS providers is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was designed to understand the practice patterns among MS providers in the United States, including time spent on direct and indirect patient care, as well as managing electronic medical record portal messages. The National MS Society and the American Academy of Neurology facilitated the distribution of the survey to MS providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most providers spent at least 1 hour on new and at least 30 minutes on follow-up direct patient care. For indirect patient care, 77% of providers spent more than 1 hour and 57% spent more than 2 hours per day. While some providers have support staff to help with portal messages, many do not have protected time or compensation for portal messages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple sclerosis providers spent a higher-than-average time on direct and indirect patient care tasks, including portal messages, and most lack protected time or compensation for portal messages. These results highlight the potential impact of indirect patient care (notably portal messages) on provider workload and burnout. Better support, protected time and/or compensation for indirect patient care can help ease physician burden and decrease burnout.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"13-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10779709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多发性硬化症(MS)患者的间接护理时间经常被少报且没有补偿。缺乏MS提供者用于间接和直接护理的时间数据。一项调查旨在了解美国MS提供者的实践模式,包括用于直接和间接患者护理以及管理电子病历门户消息的时间。美国国家多发性硬化症学会和美国神经病学学会协助将调查分发给多发性痴呆症提供者。大多数提供者在新的患者护理上花费了至少1小时,在后续的直接患者护理上至少花费了30分钟。对于间接患者护理,77%的服务提供者每天花费超过1小时,57%的服务提供者花费超过2小时。虽然一些提供商有支持人员来帮助处理门户消息,但许多提供商没有受保护的时间或门户消息补偿。多发性硬化症提供者在直接和间接患者护理任务上花费的时间高于平均水平,包括门户消息,大多数提供者缺乏受保护的时间或对门户消息的补偿。这些结果突出了间接患者护理(尤其是门户信息)对提供者工作量和倦怠的潜在影响。对间接患者护理提供更好的支持、保护时间和/或补偿,有助于减轻医生负担,减少倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Direct and Indirect Care of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Burden on Providers and Impact of Portal Messages.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) indirect patient-care time is often underreported and uncompensated. Data on time spent on indirect and direct care by MS providers is lacking.

Methods: A survey was designed to understand the practice patterns among MS providers in the United States, including time spent on direct and indirect patient care, as well as managing electronic medical record portal messages. The National MS Society and the American Academy of Neurology facilitated the distribution of the survey to MS providers.

Results: Most providers spent at least 1 hour on new and at least 30 minutes on follow-up direct patient care. For indirect patient care, 77% of providers spent more than 1 hour and 57% spent more than 2 hours per day. While some providers have support staff to help with portal messages, many do not have protected time or compensation for portal messages.

Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis providers spent a higher-than-average time on direct and indirect patient care tasks, including portal messages, and most lack protected time or compensation for portal messages. These results highlight the potential impact of indirect patient care (notably portal messages) on provider workload and burnout. Better support, protected time and/or compensation for indirect patient care can help ease physician burden and decrease burnout.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1