模棱两可的边界和混合文化:文化和排斥在欧洲移民历史话语中的作用

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1177/00472441221090719
Lydia Ayame Hiraide
{"title":"模棱两可的边界和混合文化:文化和排斥在欧洲移民历史话语中的作用","authors":"Lydia Ayame Hiraide","doi":"10.1177/00472441221090719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reflects on historical arguments about migration in conceptualisations of Europe, highlighting an ambivalent support of migration within Europe on the grounds of mutual cultural enrichment. There is a strong tradition, dating back to French and German eighteenth-century thinkers, such as Herder, Voltaire and Fichte, of citing cultural diversity, plurality and exchange to construct an idea of Europe. ‘Europolitanism’, the ideal of Europe as an open space of welcome movement and unprejudiced exchange, conceals, however, exclusionary tendencies: exchange has never been intended for all social groups. Contemporary theorisations of Europe, based ostensibly on cultural exchange, synthesis and plurality, have their roots in Romantic and Enlightenment thought, but then as now there are questions to be asked about participation in pan-European identity formation.","PeriodicalId":43875,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambivalent borders and hybrid culture: The role of culture and exclusion in historical European discourses of migration\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Ayame Hiraide\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00472441221090719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reflects on historical arguments about migration in conceptualisations of Europe, highlighting an ambivalent support of migration within Europe on the grounds of mutual cultural enrichment. There is a strong tradition, dating back to French and German eighteenth-century thinkers, such as Herder, Voltaire and Fichte, of citing cultural diversity, plurality and exchange to construct an idea of Europe. ‘Europolitanism’, the ideal of Europe as an open space of welcome movement and unprejudiced exchange, conceals, however, exclusionary tendencies: exchange has never been intended for all social groups. Contemporary theorisations of Europe, based ostensibly on cultural exchange, synthesis and plurality, have their roots in Romantic and Enlightenment thought, but then as now there are questions to be asked about participation in pan-European identity formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441221090719\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441221090719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文反思了欧洲概念中关于移民的历史争论,强调了基于相互文化丰富的欧洲内部对移民的矛盾支持。有一个强大的传统,可以追溯到18世纪的法国和德国思想家,如赫尔德、伏尔泰和费希特,他们引用文化多样性、多元性和交流来构建欧洲理念。”“欧洲主义”是欧洲作为欢迎运动和公正交流的开放空间的理想,但它掩盖了排斥倾向:交流从来不是针对所有社会群体的。当代欧洲理论表面上基于文化交流、综合和多元,其根源在于浪漫主义和启蒙思想,但当时和现在一样,关于参与泛欧身份认同的形成也存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ambivalent borders and hybrid culture: The role of culture and exclusion in historical European discourses of migration
This article reflects on historical arguments about migration in conceptualisations of Europe, highlighting an ambivalent support of migration within Europe on the grounds of mutual cultural enrichment. There is a strong tradition, dating back to French and German eighteenth-century thinkers, such as Herder, Voltaire and Fichte, of citing cultural diversity, plurality and exchange to construct an idea of Europe. ‘Europolitanism’, the ideal of Europe as an open space of welcome movement and unprejudiced exchange, conceals, however, exclusionary tendencies: exchange has never been intended for all social groups. Contemporary theorisations of Europe, based ostensibly on cultural exchange, synthesis and plurality, have their roots in Romantic and Enlightenment thought, but then as now there are questions to be asked about participation in pan-European identity formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Journal of European Studies is firmly established as one of the leading interdisciplinary humanities and cultural studies journals in universities and other academic institutions. From time to time, individual issue concentrate on particular themes. Review essays and review notices also offer a wide and informed coverage of many books that are published on European cultural themes.
期刊最新文献
Enough names on the cover already: The 52-year process behind Jerzy Peterkiewicz, Burns Singer and Christine Brooke-Rose’s translations of Cyprian Norwid Breaking the borders: Gender dynamics in STEM portrayals in Turkish Netflix series Berlin in English: The German capital in recent Anglophone fiction Redefining Vygotsky’s early works as a theory of aesthetics Book Review: Ina Linge: Queer Livability: German Sexual Sciences and Life Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1