类风湿关节炎患者与对照组的听力评价

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY ENT Updates Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.32448/ENTUPDATES.574363
Zafer Volkan Gökçe, S. Öztürk, Ceki Paltura
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者与对照组的听力评价","authors":"Zafer Volkan Gökçe, S. Öztürk, Ceki Paltura","doi":"10.32448/ENTUPDATES.574363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To demonstrate the effects of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on hearing with audiometric and tympanometric measurements, and to reveal its relationship with the disease in comparison with healthy volunteers. Methods: The study included 30 RA patients and 30 healthy controls. Demographic findings such as age, height, weight, onset of complaint (year), time elapsed since diagnosis, previous surgery, accompanying systemic disease, drugs used, family history, habits of smoking and alcohol use were questioned for both groups. Tympanometry, pure voice audiometry and otoacoustic Emission tests were performed. Results: The hearing thresholds in the airway conduction in RA group were significantly higher in all frequencies (0.25-6 kHz) than in the control group. When bone conduction hearing thresholds were compared, RA group was more affected at only 4 kHz and left ear (p=0.006). When air-bone conduction differences (AB-gap) were examined, the differences in the RA group at 0.5, 1 and 4 kHz were statistically significant. When tympanometry and acoustic reflex measurement results were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. In the transient OAE test, 3 (10 %) patients were in the RA and 2 (6.6 %) patients in the control group (p=0.064). Conclusion: Conductive hearing loss was significantly more frequent in patients with RA than in healthy individuals, whereas bone conduction was affected partially at high frequencies; whereas stapes reflex, compliance and pressure values were not significantly affected.","PeriodicalId":41744,"journal":{"name":"ENT Updates","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of hearing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls\",\"authors\":\"Zafer Volkan Gökçe, S. Öztürk, Ceki Paltura\",\"doi\":\"10.32448/ENTUPDATES.574363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To demonstrate the effects of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on hearing with audiometric and tympanometric measurements, and to reveal its relationship with the disease in comparison with healthy volunteers. Methods: The study included 30 RA patients and 30 healthy controls. Demographic findings such as age, height, weight, onset of complaint (year), time elapsed since diagnosis, previous surgery, accompanying systemic disease, drugs used, family history, habits of smoking and alcohol use were questioned for both groups. Tympanometry, pure voice audiometry and otoacoustic Emission tests were performed. Results: The hearing thresholds in the airway conduction in RA group were significantly higher in all frequencies (0.25-6 kHz) than in the control group. When bone conduction hearing thresholds were compared, RA group was more affected at only 4 kHz and left ear (p=0.006). When air-bone conduction differences (AB-gap) were examined, the differences in the RA group at 0.5, 1 and 4 kHz were statistically significant. When tympanometry and acoustic reflex measurement results were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. In the transient OAE test, 3 (10 %) patients were in the RA and 2 (6.6 %) patients in the control group (p=0.064). Conclusion: Conductive hearing loss was significantly more frequent in patients with RA than in healthy individuals, whereas bone conduction was affected partially at high frequencies; whereas stapes reflex, compliance and pressure values were not significantly affected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENT Updates\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENT Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32448/ENTUPDATES.574363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENT Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32448/ENTUPDATES.574363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis, RA)对听力的影响,并与健康人群进行比较,探讨类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis, RA)与听力的关系。方法:选取30例RA患者和30例健康对照。对两组患者的年龄、身高、体重、发病(年)、诊断后的时间、既往手术、伴随的全身性疾病、药物使用、家族史、吸烟和饮酒习惯等人口统计学调查结果进行了询问。进行鼓室测听、纯音测听和耳声发射测试。结果:RA组气道传导听力阈值在0.25 ~ 6 kHz各频率均显著高于对照组。骨传导听力阈值比较,RA组仅在4 kHz和左耳受影响更大(p=0.006)。当检测空气-骨传导差异(AB-gap)时,RA组在0.5、1、4 kHz时差异有统计学意义。当评估鼓室测量和声反射测量结果时,组间差异无统计学意义。在短暂性OAE试验中,RA组3例(10%),对照组2例(6.6%)(p=0.064)。结论:传导性听力损失在RA患者中的发生率明显高于健康人,而骨传导在高频率时受到部分影响;而镫骨反射、顺应性和压力值无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of hearing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls
Objective: To demonstrate the effects of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on hearing with audiometric and tympanometric measurements, and to reveal its relationship with the disease in comparison with healthy volunteers. Methods: The study included 30 RA patients and 30 healthy controls. Demographic findings such as age, height, weight, onset of complaint (year), time elapsed since diagnosis, previous surgery, accompanying systemic disease, drugs used, family history, habits of smoking and alcohol use were questioned for both groups. Tympanometry, pure voice audiometry and otoacoustic Emission tests were performed. Results: The hearing thresholds in the airway conduction in RA group were significantly higher in all frequencies (0.25-6 kHz) than in the control group. When bone conduction hearing thresholds were compared, RA group was more affected at only 4 kHz and left ear (p=0.006). When air-bone conduction differences (AB-gap) were examined, the differences in the RA group at 0.5, 1 and 4 kHz were statistically significant. When tympanometry and acoustic reflex measurement results were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. In the transient OAE test, 3 (10 %) patients were in the RA and 2 (6.6 %) patients in the control group (p=0.064). Conclusion: Conductive hearing loss was significantly more frequent in patients with RA than in healthy individuals, whereas bone conduction was affected partially at high frequencies; whereas stapes reflex, compliance and pressure values were not significantly affected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ENT Updates
ENT Updates OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frankie Valli: How Stapes Surgery Saved His Career Domenico Cotugno (1736-1822), Antonio Scarpa (1752-1832), and Alfonso Corti (1822-1876): The Most Important Discoveries of the Inner Ear Made by Young Italian Physicians—Domenico Cotugno Association of Face Mask Use With Nasal Symptoms And Mucociliary Clearance Examination of the Clinic, Radiologic, and Demographic Characteristics of 436 Patients with Nasal Fracture Ear Nose Throat Foreign Bodies in Children: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1