职业性噪声诱发耳鸣:听觉行为和电生理评价综述

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2023-03-12 DOI:10.18502/avr.v32i2.12164
B. Kohansal, M. Asghari, Mahsa Habibi
{"title":"职业性噪声诱发耳鸣:听觉行为和电生理评价综述","authors":"B. Kohansal, M. Asghari, Mahsa Habibi","doi":"10.18502/avr.v32i2.12164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: The increasing prevalence of Noise-Induced Tinnitus (NIT) is considered one of the major occupational health threats these days. Despite the devastating effect of tinnitus on a subject’s performance, auditory functions and life quality,  there is a lack of standard protocol for its diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the mechanisms    of NIT are not clear yet. So, this review summarized data on NIT mechanisms as well as questionnaires, behavioral and physiologic assessment tools in NIT studies. \nRecent Findings: Based on the authors’ research,  27  eligible articles were  included  in this review. NIT was mainly bilateral with moderate severity with an overall prevalence ranging from 4% to 73.7%. Self-report questionnaires, tinnitus handicap inventory, auditory brainstem response, otoacoustic emissions and speech in noise tests were the most frequent NIT assessment methods in the reviewed studies. Our review highlights increased latencies  in brainstem evoked potentials in tinnitus workers, but the knowledge gap about changes at subcortical and cortical levels remains. \nConclusion: This review suggests speech in noise test as a useful extension to routine tinnitus assessment by questionnaires among workers. Due to insufficient studies and inconsistent results in NIT subjects, more electrophysiological research is suggested in large and homogeneous samples. \nKeywords: Noise; tinnitus; occupational; questionnaire; physiological","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Noise-Induced Tinnitus: A Review of Auditory Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evaluations\",\"authors\":\"B. Kohansal, M. Asghari, Mahsa Habibi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/avr.v32i2.12164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: The increasing prevalence of Noise-Induced Tinnitus (NIT) is considered one of the major occupational health threats these days. Despite the devastating effect of tinnitus on a subject’s performance, auditory functions and life quality,  there is a lack of standard protocol for its diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the mechanisms    of NIT are not clear yet. So, this review summarized data on NIT mechanisms as well as questionnaires, behavioral and physiologic assessment tools in NIT studies. \\nRecent Findings: Based on the authors’ research,  27  eligible articles were  included  in this review. NIT was mainly bilateral with moderate severity with an overall prevalence ranging from 4% to 73.7%. Self-report questionnaires, tinnitus handicap inventory, auditory brainstem response, otoacoustic emissions and speech in noise tests were the most frequent NIT assessment methods in the reviewed studies. Our review highlights increased latencies  in brainstem evoked potentials in tinnitus workers, but the knowledge gap about changes at subcortical and cortical levels remains. \\nConclusion: This review suggests speech in noise test as a useful extension to routine tinnitus assessment by questionnaires among workers. Due to insufficient studies and inconsistent results in NIT subjects, more electrophysiological research is suggested in large and homogeneous samples. \\nKeywords: Noise; tinnitus; occupational; questionnaire; physiological\",\"PeriodicalId\":34089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i2.12164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i2.12164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:噪声性耳鸣(NIT)的日益流行被认为是当今主要的职业健康威胁之一。尽管耳鸣对一个人的表现、听觉功能和生活质量有毁灭性的影响,但缺乏标准的诊断和治疗方案。此外,NIT的机制尚不清楚。因此,本文综述了NIT的机制以及NIT研究中的问卷调查、行为和生理评估工具。最新发现:根据作者的研究,本综述纳入了27篇符合条件的文章。NIT主要为双侧,严重程度中等,总体患病率为4%至73.7%。自我报告问卷、耳鸣障碍量表、听觉脑干反应、耳声发射和噪音测试中的言语是所回顾研究中最常见的NIT评估方法。我们的综述强调了耳鸣工作者脑干诱发电位潜伏期的增加,但关于皮层下和皮层水平变化的知识差距仍然存在。结论:噪声中语音测试是常规工人耳鸣问卷评估的有益延伸。由于对NIT受试者的研究不足和结果不一致,建议在大样本和均匀样本中进行更多的电生理研究。关键词:噪声;耳鸣;职业;问卷调查;生理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Occupational Noise-Induced Tinnitus: A Review of Auditory Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evaluations
Background and Aim: The increasing prevalence of Noise-Induced Tinnitus (NIT) is considered one of the major occupational health threats these days. Despite the devastating effect of tinnitus on a subject’s performance, auditory functions and life quality,  there is a lack of standard protocol for its diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the mechanisms    of NIT are not clear yet. So, this review summarized data on NIT mechanisms as well as questionnaires, behavioral and physiologic assessment tools in NIT studies. Recent Findings: Based on the authors’ research,  27  eligible articles were  included  in this review. NIT was mainly bilateral with moderate severity with an overall prevalence ranging from 4% to 73.7%. Self-report questionnaires, tinnitus handicap inventory, auditory brainstem response, otoacoustic emissions and speech in noise tests were the most frequent NIT assessment methods in the reviewed studies. Our review highlights increased latencies  in brainstem evoked potentials in tinnitus workers, but the knowledge gap about changes at subcortical and cortical levels remains. Conclusion: This review suggests speech in noise test as a useful extension to routine tinnitus assessment by questionnaires among workers. Due to insufficient studies and inconsistent results in NIT subjects, more electrophysiological research is suggested in large and homogeneous samples. Keywords: Noise; tinnitus; occupational; questionnaire; physiological
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Hearing Aid Uptake Rate of Patients Seen at the Community Hearing Clinic: A Model of Upstream Preventive Care and Earlier Intervention The Use of Homotonic Monosyllabic Words in the Persian Language for the Word-in-Noise Perception Test Development of a Smart Game Application for Auditory Training of Children with Spatial Processing Disorder in Iran: A Pilot Study Investigating the Effect of Persian Phonemic Synthesis Program in Cochlear Implant Users with Phoneme Processing Dificulities Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy on the Daily Life Aspects of Military Men with Persistent Postural- Perceptual Dizziness: A Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1