新中国军事史,1839-1951:故事是怎样的?

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY Frontiers of History in China Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0
C. W. Hayford
{"title":"新中国军事史,1839-1951:故事是怎样的?","authors":"C. W. Hayford","doi":"10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1990, New Chinese Military History in the West has remedied scholarly neglect of Chinese warfare and changed the usual stories of modern China. These studies disproved Orientalist assumptions of a unique “Chinese way of war” or a strategic culture that avoided aggressive confrontation. Scholars also challenge the assumption that Confucian immobility led to a clash of civilizations and decisive defeat in the Opium Wars, First Sino-Japanese War, and Boxer War of 1900. In fact, Qing officials were quick and successful in creating a new military regime. New military histories of the warlords, the Sino-Japanese Wars, and the Chinese Civil War show that developing new types of warfare was central in creating the new nation. All these wars split the country into factions that were supported by outside powers: they were internationalized civil wars. The article also asks how the choice of terms, labels, and categories shapes interpretations and political messages.","PeriodicalId":41988,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of History in China","volume":"13 1","pages":"90-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Chinese Military History, 1839–1951: What’s the Story?\",\"authors\":\"C. W. Hayford\",\"doi\":\"10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 1990, New Chinese Military History in the West has remedied scholarly neglect of Chinese warfare and changed the usual stories of modern China. These studies disproved Orientalist assumptions of a unique “Chinese way of war” or a strategic culture that avoided aggressive confrontation. Scholars also challenge the assumption that Confucian immobility led to a clash of civilizations and decisive defeat in the Opium Wars, First Sino-Japanese War, and Boxer War of 1900. In fact, Qing officials were quick and successful in creating a new military regime. New military histories of the warlords, the Sino-Japanese Wars, and the Chinese Civil War show that developing new types of warfare was central in creating the new nation. All these wars split the country into factions that were supported by outside powers: they were internationalized civil wars. The article also asks how the choice of terms, labels, and categories shapes interpretations and political messages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of History in China\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"90-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of History in China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of History in China","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S020-007-018-0006-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1990年以来,西方的《新中国军事史》弥补了学术界对中国战争的忽视,改变了现代中国通常的故事。这些研究推翻了东方主义者关于独特的“中国战争方式”或避免侵略性对抗的战略文化的假设。学者们还对儒家的不动导致文明冲突和在鸦片战争、第一次中日战争和1900年义和团战争中的决定性失败的假设提出了质疑。事实上,清朝官员在建立一个新的军事政权方面迅速而成功。军阀、中日战争和中国内战的新军事史表明,发展新型战争是建立新国家的核心。所有这些战争都将国家分裂成了得到外部势力支持的派系:它们是国际化的内战。文章还询问了术语、标签和类别的选择如何影响解释和政治信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Chinese Military History, 1839–1951: What’s the Story?
Since 1990, New Chinese Military History in the West has remedied scholarly neglect of Chinese warfare and changed the usual stories of modern China. These studies disproved Orientalist assumptions of a unique “Chinese way of war” or a strategic culture that avoided aggressive confrontation. Scholars also challenge the assumption that Confucian immobility led to a clash of civilizations and decisive defeat in the Opium Wars, First Sino-Japanese War, and Boxer War of 1900. In fact, Qing officials were quick and successful in creating a new military regime. New military histories of the warlords, the Sino-Japanese Wars, and the Chinese Civil War show that developing new types of warfare was central in creating the new nation. All these wars split the country into factions that were supported by outside powers: they were internationalized civil wars. The article also asks how the choice of terms, labels, and categories shapes interpretations and political messages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
373
期刊最新文献
Bringing Chinese Law in Line with Western Standards? Problematizing “Chinese” and “Western” in the Late Qing Debate over the New Criminal Code of Great Qing Cattle Slaughter Industry in Qing China: State Ban, Muslim Dominance, and the Western Diet A Textual Study of the Myth of Manchu Origin The Cyclical Views of Human History in Thucydides’ Archaeology and Sima Qian’s Historical Records Discovering the Long : Current Theories and Trends in Research on the Chinese Dragon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1