中国对巴西制造业的冲击:生产率、创新和就业的教训

IF 1.3 Q3 ECONOMICS International Trade Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.1080/08853908.2023.2174215
M. Moreira, Marisol Rodríguez Chatruc, Filipe Lage, Federico Merchán
{"title":"中国对巴西制造业的冲击:生产率、创新和就业的教训","authors":"M. Moreira, Marisol Rodríguez Chatruc, Filipe Lage, Federico Merchán","doi":"10.1080/08853908.2023.2174215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We use the China shock in Brazil as a quasi-natural experiment to revisit the impact of trade on firm productivity, innovation, and employment. The results corroborate some of the key findings of trade liberalization literature of the 1990s, pointing to a positive although modest effect of trade on productivity. They also point to relatively modest job losses. They raise questions, though, about the effects on innovation, contradicting the positive estimates of the 1990s. This mismatch between productivity and innovation questions the ability of trade policy to deliver sustainable productivity growth on its own.","PeriodicalId":35638,"journal":{"name":"International Trade Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"266 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The China Shock on Manufacturing in Brazil: Lessons on Productivity, Innovation, and Jobs\",\"authors\":\"M. Moreira, Marisol Rodríguez Chatruc, Filipe Lage, Federico Merchán\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08853908.2023.2174215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We use the China shock in Brazil as a quasi-natural experiment to revisit the impact of trade on firm productivity, innovation, and employment. The results corroborate some of the key findings of trade liberalization literature of the 1990s, pointing to a positive although modest effect of trade on productivity. They also point to relatively modest job losses. They raise questions, though, about the effects on innovation, contradicting the positive estimates of the 1990s. This mismatch between productivity and innovation questions the ability of trade policy to deliver sustainable productivity growth on its own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Trade Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"266 - 289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Trade Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2023.2174215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2023.2174215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:我们将巴西的中国冲击作为一个准自然实验,重新审视贸易对企业生产力、创新和就业的影响。这些结果证实了1990年代贸易自由化文献的一些关键发现,指出贸易对生产力的影响虽然不大,但却是积极的。他们还指出,失业人数相对较少。然而,它们提出了对创新影响的问题,与20世纪90年代的积极估计相矛盾。生产力和创新之间的这种不匹配质疑了贸易政策本身实现可持续生产力增长的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The China Shock on Manufacturing in Brazil: Lessons on Productivity, Innovation, and Jobs
ABSTRACT We use the China shock in Brazil as a quasi-natural experiment to revisit the impact of trade on firm productivity, innovation, and employment. The results corroborate some of the key findings of trade liberalization literature of the 1990s, pointing to a positive although modest effect of trade on productivity. They also point to relatively modest job losses. They raise questions, though, about the effects on innovation, contradicting the positive estimates of the 1990s. This mismatch between productivity and innovation questions the ability of trade policy to deliver sustainable productivity growth on its own.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Trade Journal
International Trade Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The International Trade Journal is a refereed interdisciplinary journal published for the enhancement of research in international trade. Its editorial objective is to provide a forum for the scholarly exchange of research findings in,and significant empirical, conceptual, or theoretical contributions to the field. The International Trade Journal welcomes contributions from researchers in academia as well as practitioners of international trade broadly defined.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the Role of Institutional Structures in the Relationship Between Trade Openness and Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa Is Aid-FDI-Financial Development Dynamics a Vanguard for Economic Growth? Perspective of the Emerging Asian Economies The Globalization Myth: Why Regions Matter Economic Complexity and Ecological Degradation in Africa: Does Globalization Matter? CPTPP and WTO DSMs: Scope for Institutional and Procedural Reforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1