起诉说唱:判例法告诉我们什么?

IF 0.7 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Popular Music Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1017/S0261143022000575
A. Owusu-Bempah
{"title":"起诉说唱:判例法告诉我们什么?","authors":"A. Owusu-Bempah","doi":"10.1017/S0261143022000575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores the admissibility and use of rap music as evidence in English criminal trials. It presents findings from an analysis of over 30 appeal cases. As well as unpacking the link between rap, race and gangs that is prevalent in these cases, the article challenges the categorisation of rap as ‘bad character evidence’, and critiques the way in which questions of relevance and prejudicial effect have been addressed by the courts. In particular, when making admissibility decisions, the courts appear to give little consideration to the cultural context, artistic conventions or social influences within the rap music genre, or the racialised nature of rap evidence. It is argued that, if rap is to be admissible evidence, a much more rigorous and informed approach is required.","PeriodicalId":46171,"journal":{"name":"Popular Music","volume":"41 1","pages":"427 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prosecuting rap: what does the case law tell us?\",\"authors\":\"A. Owusu-Bempah\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0261143022000575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article explores the admissibility and use of rap music as evidence in English criminal trials. It presents findings from an analysis of over 30 appeal cases. As well as unpacking the link between rap, race and gangs that is prevalent in these cases, the article challenges the categorisation of rap as ‘bad character evidence’, and critiques the way in which questions of relevance and prejudicial effect have been addressed by the courts. In particular, when making admissibility decisions, the courts appear to give little consideration to the cultural context, artistic conventions or social influences within the rap music genre, or the racialised nature of rap evidence. It is argued that, if rap is to be admissible evidence, a much more rigorous and informed approach is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Popular Music\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"427 - 445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Popular Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143022000575\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143022000575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了说唱音乐作为证据在英国刑事审判中的可采性及其运用。它介绍了对30多个上诉案件的分析结果。除了揭示这些案件中普遍存在的说唱、种族和帮派之间的联系外,文章还挑战了将说唱归类为“不良品格证据”的观点,并批评了法院处理相关问题和偏见影响的方式。特别是,在作出可采性决定时,法院似乎很少考虑说唱音乐类型的文化背景、艺术惯例或社会影响,或说唱证据的种族化性质。有人认为,如果说唱是可接受的证据,就需要一种更加严格和知情的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prosecuting rap: what does the case law tell us?
Abstract This article explores the admissibility and use of rap music as evidence in English criminal trials. It presents findings from an analysis of over 30 appeal cases. As well as unpacking the link between rap, race and gangs that is prevalent in these cases, the article challenges the categorisation of rap as ‘bad character evidence’, and critiques the way in which questions of relevance and prejudicial effect have been addressed by the courts. In particular, when making admissibility decisions, the courts appear to give little consideration to the cultural context, artistic conventions or social influences within the rap music genre, or the racialised nature of rap evidence. It is argued that, if rap is to be admissible evidence, a much more rigorous and informed approach is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Popular Music
Popular Music MUSIC-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Popular Music is an international multi-disciplinary journal covering all aspects of the subject - from the formation of social group identities through popular music, to the workings of the global music industry, to how particular pieces of music are put together. The journal includes all kinds of popular music, whether rap or rai, jazz or rock, from any historical era and any geographical location. Popular Music carries articles by scholars from a variety of disciplines and theoretical perspectives. Each issue contains substantial, authoritative and influential articles, topical pieces, and reviews of a wide range of books.
期刊最新文献
Fluid revivals: retouring popular songs to restore a hydrological imaginary in the trans-Danube Celtic music, Shakespeare and fandom The Greatest Rock and Soul Band in the World? The Rolling Stones, genre and race Listening to Mapuche sound in Illapu Kardeş Türküler as ‘art action’: The multiple cultural heritages of Anatolia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1