H. Su, Hai‐hong Wang, Lili Liu, Tao Cheng, Yuqi He, P. Jin, Lang Yang, J. Sheng
{"title":"内镜下黏膜下剥离术对不同直径的早期结直肠癌及癌前病变的治疗价值","authors":"H. Su, Hai‐hong Wang, Lili Liu, Tao Cheng, Yuqi He, P. Jin, Lang Yang, J. Sheng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the differences of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors of different diameters. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 210 cases which were treated with ESD for colorectal tumors at the Endoscopy Center, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from October 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The lesions were divided into two groups according to different diameters (≥4.0 cm group and <4.0 cm group) for comparative analysis of related factors. \n \n \nResults \nThe mean procedure time of ESD for 210 colorectal tumor cases was 50.3±42.7 min and the mean size of lesions was 7.98±10.84 cm2 . En bloc resection rate was 91.4%, R0 resection rate was 90.5%, and the curative resection rate was 88.6%. Perforation rate was 5.2% (11/210), and the late hemorrhage rate was 0.5% (1/210). Compared with lesions < 4.0 cm, those ≥ 4.0 cm required longer resection time (79.63±53.91 min VS 35.28±24.99 min, P<0.001); and the lesions were mainly located in the rectum (61.97%). LSTs were mainly mixed granular/nongranular type (54.93%); en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate and curative resection rate of the tumors ≥ 4.0 cm were all lower than those of tumors < 4.0 cm. The difference in complete resection rate was statistically significant (85.92% VS 94.24%; P=0.041). The perforation rate (7.04%) was higher in ≥ 4.0 cm group, but the difference was not statistically significant. \n \n \nConclusions \nESD of colorectal tumors of diameters ≥ 4.0 cm requires longer time with higher operation risk. Additionally, physicians should be more careful with non-rectal lesions. \n \n \nKey words: \nColorectal cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Tumor diameter; Difference","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"339-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic value of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancers and precancerous colorectal lesions of different diameters\",\"authors\":\"H. Su, Hai‐hong Wang, Lili Liu, Tao Cheng, Yuqi He, P. Jin, Lang Yang, J. Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo study the differences of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors of different diameters. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nData of 210 cases which were treated with ESD for colorectal tumors at the Endoscopy Center, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from October 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The lesions were divided into two groups according to different diameters (≥4.0 cm group and <4.0 cm group) for comparative analysis of related factors. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe mean procedure time of ESD for 210 colorectal tumor cases was 50.3±42.7 min and the mean size of lesions was 7.98±10.84 cm2 . En bloc resection rate was 91.4%, R0 resection rate was 90.5%, and the curative resection rate was 88.6%. Perforation rate was 5.2% (11/210), and the late hemorrhage rate was 0.5% (1/210). Compared with lesions < 4.0 cm, those ≥ 4.0 cm required longer resection time (79.63±53.91 min VS 35.28±24.99 min, P<0.001); and the lesions were mainly located in the rectum (61.97%). LSTs were mainly mixed granular/nongranular type (54.93%); en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate and curative resection rate of the tumors ≥ 4.0 cm were all lower than those of tumors < 4.0 cm. The difference in complete resection rate was statistically significant (85.92% VS 94.24%; P=0.041). The perforation rate (7.04%) was higher in ≥ 4.0 cm group, but the difference was not statistically significant. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nESD of colorectal tumors of diameters ≥ 4.0 cm requires longer time with higher operation risk. Additionally, physicians should be more careful with non-rectal lesions. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nColorectal cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Tumor diameter; Difference\",\"PeriodicalId\":10072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"339-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.05.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.05.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)在不同直径结直肠肿瘤中的应用差异。方法回顾性分析2012年10月至2015年12月解放军总医院第七医学中心内镜中心210例结肠肿瘤行ESD治疗的资料。根据病变直径不同分为≥4.0 cm组和<4.0 cm组,对比分析相关因素。结果210例结直肠肿瘤的平均手术时间为50.3±42.7 min,平均病灶大小为7.98±10.84 cm2。整体切除率为91.4%,R0切除率为90.5%,治愈率为88.6%。穿孔率5.2%(11/210),晚期出血率0.5%(1/210)。与< 4.0 cm的病变相比,≥4.0 cm的病变需要更长的切除时间(79.63±53.91 min VS 35.28±24.99 min, P<0.001);病变主要位于直肠(61.97%)。lst以颗粒/非颗粒混合型为主(54.93%);≥4.0 cm的肿瘤整体切除率、完全切除率和治愈率均低于< 4.0 cm的肿瘤。两组全切除率差异有统计学意义(85.92% VS 94.24%;P = 0.041)。≥4.0 cm组穿孔率(7.04%)较高,但差异无统计学意义。结论直径≥4.0 cm的结直肠肿瘤ESD手术时间较长,手术风险较高。此外,医生应该更加小心非直肠病变。关键词:结直肠癌;内镜下粘膜下剥离;肿瘤直径;区别
Therapeutic value of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancers and precancerous colorectal lesions of different diameters
Objective
To study the differences of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors of different diameters.
Methods
Data of 210 cases which were treated with ESD for colorectal tumors at the Endoscopy Center, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from October 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The lesions were divided into two groups according to different diameters (≥4.0 cm group and <4.0 cm group) for comparative analysis of related factors.
Results
The mean procedure time of ESD for 210 colorectal tumor cases was 50.3±42.7 min and the mean size of lesions was 7.98±10.84 cm2 . En bloc resection rate was 91.4%, R0 resection rate was 90.5%, and the curative resection rate was 88.6%. Perforation rate was 5.2% (11/210), and the late hemorrhage rate was 0.5% (1/210). Compared with lesions < 4.0 cm, those ≥ 4.0 cm required longer resection time (79.63±53.91 min VS 35.28±24.99 min, P<0.001); and the lesions were mainly located in the rectum (61.97%). LSTs were mainly mixed granular/nongranular type (54.93%); en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate and curative resection rate of the tumors ≥ 4.0 cm were all lower than those of tumors < 4.0 cm. The difference in complete resection rate was statistically significant (85.92% VS 94.24%; P=0.041). The perforation rate (7.04%) was higher in ≥ 4.0 cm group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
ESD of colorectal tumors of diameters ≥ 4.0 cm requires longer time with higher operation risk. Additionally, physicians should be more careful with non-rectal lesions.
Key words:
Colorectal cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Tumor diameter; Difference
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience.
The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications.
The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.