{"title":"vp -省略与疏水合谋对句法NEG提升的影响","authors":"Y. Sato","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this squib, I will analyze a hitherto unnoticed interaction between VP-ellipsis and sluicing (TP-ellipsis) in English in which the VP-ellipsis site contains a certain positive propositional complement headed by a neg-raising predicate whereas the TP-ellipsis site instead denotes the negative counterpart of the exact same proposition, thereby yielding a mismatched-polarity interpretation between the two-ellipsis sites. I will show that the relevant data presented here provide strong support for a pragma-semantic approach to the so-called neg-raised reading (Bartsch 1973; Gajewski 2005, 2007; Kroll 2019) over the syntactic NEG raising alternative (Collins and Postal 2014, 2018).","PeriodicalId":48044,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When VP-Ellipsis and Sluicing Conspire against Syntactic NEG Raising\",\"authors\":\"Y. Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/ling_a_00500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this squib, I will analyze a hitherto unnoticed interaction between VP-ellipsis and sluicing (TP-ellipsis) in English in which the VP-ellipsis site contains a certain positive propositional complement headed by a neg-raising predicate whereas the TP-ellipsis site instead denotes the negative counterpart of the exact same proposition, thereby yielding a mismatched-polarity interpretation between the two-ellipsis sites. I will show that the relevant data presented here provide strong support for a pragma-semantic approach to the so-called neg-raised reading (Bartsch 1973; Gajewski 2005, 2007; Kroll 2019) over the syntactic NEG raising alternative (Collins and Postal 2014, 2018).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00500\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00500","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇文章中,我将分析迄今为止未被注意到的VP-ellipsis和sluicing (TP-ellipsis)在英语中的相互作用,其中VP-ellipsis位点包含一个以负提升谓词开头的肯定命题补语,而TP-ellipsis位点则表示完全相同命题的否定对应,从而在两个省略位点之间产生不匹配的极性解释。我将证明,这里提供的相关数据为所谓的负提升阅读的语用语义方法提供了强有力的支持(Bartsch 1973;Gajewski 2005,2007;Kroll 2019),而不是语法上的NEG提升替代方案(Collins and Postal 2014, 2018)。
When VP-Ellipsis and Sluicing Conspire against Syntactic NEG Raising
In this squib, I will analyze a hitherto unnoticed interaction between VP-ellipsis and sluicing (TP-ellipsis) in English in which the VP-ellipsis site contains a certain positive propositional complement headed by a neg-raising predicate whereas the TP-ellipsis site instead denotes the negative counterpart of the exact same proposition, thereby yielding a mismatched-polarity interpretation between the two-ellipsis sites. I will show that the relevant data presented here provide strong support for a pragma-semantic approach to the so-called neg-raised reading (Bartsch 1973; Gajewski 2005, 2007; Kroll 2019) over the syntactic NEG raising alternative (Collins and Postal 2014, 2018).
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Inquiry leads the field in research on current topics in linguistics. This key resource explores new theoretical developments based on the latest international scholarship, capturing the excitement of contemporary debate in full-scale articles as well as shorter contributions (Squibs and Discussion) and more extensive commentary (Remarks and Replies).