vp -省略与疏水合谋对句法NEG提升的影响

IF 1.6 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Inquiry Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1162/ling_a_00500
Y. Sato
{"title":"vp -省略与疏水合谋对句法NEG提升的影响","authors":"Y. Sato","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this squib, I will analyze a hitherto unnoticed interaction between VP-ellipsis and sluicing (TP-ellipsis) in English in which the VP-ellipsis site contains a certain positive propositional complement headed by a neg-raising predicate whereas the TP-ellipsis site instead denotes the negative counterpart of the exact same proposition, thereby yielding a mismatched-polarity interpretation between the two-ellipsis sites. I will show that the relevant data presented here provide strong support for a pragma-semantic approach to the so-called neg-raised reading (Bartsch 1973; Gajewski 2005, 2007; Kroll 2019) over the syntactic NEG raising alternative (Collins and Postal 2014, 2018).","PeriodicalId":48044,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When VP-Ellipsis and Sluicing Conspire against Syntactic NEG Raising\",\"authors\":\"Y. Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/ling_a_00500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this squib, I will analyze a hitherto unnoticed interaction between VP-ellipsis and sluicing (TP-ellipsis) in English in which the VP-ellipsis site contains a certain positive propositional complement headed by a neg-raising predicate whereas the TP-ellipsis site instead denotes the negative counterpart of the exact same proposition, thereby yielding a mismatched-polarity interpretation between the two-ellipsis sites. I will show that the relevant data presented here provide strong support for a pragma-semantic approach to the so-called neg-raised reading (Bartsch 1973; Gajewski 2005, 2007; Kroll 2019) over the syntactic NEG raising alternative (Collins and Postal 2014, 2018).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00500\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00500","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将分析迄今为止未被注意到的VP-ellipsis和sluicing (TP-ellipsis)在英语中的相互作用,其中VP-ellipsis位点包含一个以负提升谓词开头的肯定命题补语,而TP-ellipsis位点则表示完全相同命题的否定对应,从而在两个省略位点之间产生不匹配的极性解释。我将证明,这里提供的相关数据为所谓的负提升阅读的语用语义方法提供了强有力的支持(Bartsch 1973;Gajewski 2005,2007;Kroll 2019),而不是语法上的NEG提升替代方案(Collins and Postal 2014, 2018)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When VP-Ellipsis and Sluicing Conspire against Syntactic NEG Raising
In this squib, I will analyze a hitherto unnoticed interaction between VP-ellipsis and sluicing (TP-ellipsis) in English in which the VP-ellipsis site contains a certain positive propositional complement headed by a neg-raising predicate whereas the TP-ellipsis site instead denotes the negative counterpart of the exact same proposition, thereby yielding a mismatched-polarity interpretation between the two-ellipsis sites. I will show that the relevant data presented here provide strong support for a pragma-semantic approach to the so-called neg-raised reading (Bartsch 1973; Gajewski 2005, 2007; Kroll 2019) over the syntactic NEG raising alternative (Collins and Postal 2014, 2018).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Inquiry
Linguistic Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Linguistic Inquiry leads the field in research on current topics in linguistics. This key resource explores new theoretical developments based on the latest international scholarship, capturing the excitement of contemporary debate in full-scale articles as well as shorter contributions (Squibs and Discussion) and more extensive commentary (Remarks and Replies).
期刊最新文献
Inverse Linking and Extraposition VP-Preposing and Constituency “Paradox” Using Computational Models to Test Syntactic Learnability Applicative Recursion and Nominal Licensing More on (the Lack of) Reconstruction in English Tough-Constructions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1