法律裁判:对经典法学院问题的一种新颖的扭曲

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Law Teacher Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232
Patrick R. Goold
{"title":"法律裁判:对经典法学院问题的一种新颖的扭曲","authors":"Patrick R. Goold","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, educators have sought to diversify the types of assessment used in the legal curriculum. This article introduces a novel form of assessment: the legal judgment. Much like a classic “problem question”, a “legal judgment” presents students with a factual scenario to analyse. However, rather than ask students to provide legal advice, the legal judgment asks students to decide the case by issuing a written judgment. This article showcases this form of assessment while exploring its advantages and challenges. The article argues that this novel twist on the classic law school problem question helps students to develop higher-order legal reasoning abilities, is more intellectually inspiring than the classic problem question, and encourages students to truly “think like lawyers”.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"56 1","pages":"368 - 383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legal Judgment: A Novel Twist on the Classic Law School Problem Question\",\"authors\":\"Patrick R. Goold\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In recent years, educators have sought to diversify the types of assessment used in the legal curriculum. This article introduces a novel form of assessment: the legal judgment. Much like a classic “problem question”, a “legal judgment” presents students with a factual scenario to analyse. However, rather than ask students to provide legal advice, the legal judgment asks students to decide the case by issuing a written judgment. This article showcases this form of assessment while exploring its advantages and challenges. The article argues that this novel twist on the classic law school problem question helps students to develop higher-order legal reasoning abilities, is more intellectually inspiring than the classic problem question, and encourages students to truly “think like lawyers”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"368 - 383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要近年来,教育工作者试图使法律课程中使用的评估类型多样化。本文介绍了一种新颖的评估形式:法律判决。就像经典的“问题题”一样,“法律判决”为学生提供了一个需要分析的事实场景。然而,法律判决书并没有要求学生提供法律咨询,而是要求学生通过发布书面判决书来决定案件。本文展示了这种评估形式,同时探讨了它的优势和挑战。文章认为,这种对法学院经典问题的新颖扭曲有助于学生培养更高层次的法律推理能力,比经典问题更具智力启发性,并鼓励学生真正“像律师一样思考”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Legal Judgment: A Novel Twist on the Classic Law School Problem Question
ABSTRACT In recent years, educators have sought to diversify the types of assessment used in the legal curriculum. This article introduces a novel form of assessment: the legal judgment. Much like a classic “problem question”, a “legal judgment” presents students with a factual scenario to analyse. However, rather than ask students to provide legal advice, the legal judgment asks students to decide the case by issuing a written judgment. This article showcases this form of assessment while exploring its advantages and challenges. The article argues that this novel twist on the classic law school problem question helps students to develop higher-order legal reasoning abilities, is more intellectually inspiring than the classic problem question, and encourages students to truly “think like lawyers”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Lawyers and the rule of law Lawyers and the rule of law , by Andrew Boon, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2022, 573 pp., £90 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-50992-521-6 A binate regulatory framework for the accreditation of law faculties in Nigerian universities: a necessity or overkill? Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams , by Richard Michael Fischl and Jeremy R. Paul, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2023, 474 pp., $45.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-59460-734-9 Law teachers’ adoption and acceptance of OBE: a case study of Hong Kong Storytelling: a five-tier framework and the flipped classroom approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1