信徒唱诗班?调查参与、反应偏差与公共服务动机之实验与纵向证据

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Public Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1080/10967494.2023.2166635
Morten Hjortskov, C. Jacobsen, A. M. Kjeldsen
{"title":"信徒唱诗班?调查参与、反应偏差与公共服务动机之实验与纵向证据","authors":"Morten Hjortskov, C. Jacobsen, A. M. Kjeldsen","doi":"10.1080/10967494.2023.2166635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Collecting data through surveys are a vital method in public administration research, but an overseen challenge for the validity of survey research is response bias, which is when response behavior correlates with study outcomes. Response bias can be particularly threatening in motivation research because motivation is an important determinant for behavior and most likely also for survey participation. Specifically, public service motivation (PSM) can increase the willingness to devote time and effort to respond to surveys for the benefit of others, whereas extrinsically motivated individuals may be less inclined to participate in surveys without prospects of economic compensation. This article examines motivation and response bias by use of a preregistered field experiment and two panel datasets. The experimental study shows that a monetary incentive increases the response rate, whereas a PSM-oriented appeal does not. Furthermore, the increased response rate of the incentive is achieved without any detectable response bias on PSM. Likewise, the panel studies offer little and mixed support for response bias related with PSM. This evidence suggests that (1) PSM is not a (strong) driver of response bias, and that (2) extrinsic motivational tools applied to PSM surveys are not necessarily associated with response bias.","PeriodicalId":47671,"journal":{"name":"International Public Management Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"281 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choir of believers? Experimental and longitudinal evidence on survey participation, response bias, and public service motivation\",\"authors\":\"Morten Hjortskov, C. Jacobsen, A. M. Kjeldsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10967494.2023.2166635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Collecting data through surveys are a vital method in public administration research, but an overseen challenge for the validity of survey research is response bias, which is when response behavior correlates with study outcomes. Response bias can be particularly threatening in motivation research because motivation is an important determinant for behavior and most likely also for survey participation. Specifically, public service motivation (PSM) can increase the willingness to devote time and effort to respond to surveys for the benefit of others, whereas extrinsically motivated individuals may be less inclined to participate in surveys without prospects of economic compensation. This article examines motivation and response bias by use of a preregistered field experiment and two panel datasets. The experimental study shows that a monetary incentive increases the response rate, whereas a PSM-oriented appeal does not. Furthermore, the increased response rate of the incentive is achieved without any detectable response bias on PSM. Likewise, the panel studies offer little and mixed support for response bias related with PSM. This evidence suggests that (1) PSM is not a (strong) driver of response bias, and that (2) extrinsic motivational tools applied to PSM surveys are not necessarily associated with response bias.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Public Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"281 - 304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Public Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2166635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2166635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过调查收集数据是公共行政研究的重要方法,但调查研究有效性面临的一个被忽视的挑战是反应偏差,即反应行为与研究结果相关。在动机研究中,反应偏差尤其具有威胁性,因为动机是行为的重要决定因素,也很可能是调查参与的决定因素。具体来说,公共服务动机(PSM)可以增加为他人的利益投入时间和精力回应调查的意愿,而外在动机的个人可能不太愿意参与没有经济补偿前景的调查。本文通过使用预注册的现场实验和两个面板数据集来检查动机和反应偏差。实验研究表明,金钱激励提高了回应率,而以psm为导向的呼吁则没有。此外,在没有可检测到的PSM反应偏差的情况下,实现了激励的反应率增加。同样,小组研究对与PSM相关的反应偏倚提供了很少和混合的支持。这些证据表明:(1)PSM不是反应偏差的(强)驱动因素,(2)应用于PSM调查的外在动机工具不一定与反应偏差相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choir of believers? Experimental and longitudinal evidence on survey participation, response bias, and public service motivation
Abstract Collecting data through surveys are a vital method in public administration research, but an overseen challenge for the validity of survey research is response bias, which is when response behavior correlates with study outcomes. Response bias can be particularly threatening in motivation research because motivation is an important determinant for behavior and most likely also for survey participation. Specifically, public service motivation (PSM) can increase the willingness to devote time and effort to respond to surveys for the benefit of others, whereas extrinsically motivated individuals may be less inclined to participate in surveys without prospects of economic compensation. This article examines motivation and response bias by use of a preregistered field experiment and two panel datasets. The experimental study shows that a monetary incentive increases the response rate, whereas a PSM-oriented appeal does not. Furthermore, the increased response rate of the incentive is achieved without any detectable response bias on PSM. Likewise, the panel studies offer little and mixed support for response bias related with PSM. This evidence suggests that (1) PSM is not a (strong) driver of response bias, and that (2) extrinsic motivational tools applied to PSM surveys are not necessarily associated with response bias.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Public Management Journal (IPMJ) publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical work on managing large organizations, particularly public organizations. IPMJ features work from scholars around the world who conduct research in the areas of public management and government reform, comparative public administration, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. IPMJ seeks to provide a bridge between those conducting research on public management and public administration on the one hand, and those working in the areas of organizational behavior and organization theory on the other. IPMJ intends to stimulate and reflect the academic interests of an international constituency of readers and scholars.
期刊最新文献
It takes two to tango: concepts and evidence of further integration of public service motivation theory and self-determination theory Deliberative Democracy, Public Policy, and Local Government Public value and the digital economy Controversies in employee-driven innovation: Exploring the Danish public healthcare Transforming public and private sector organizations: Implementing sustainable purpose, traveling organization and connectivity for resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1