一种诱饵时间排序陷阱,使Dung Beetle(鞘翅目:Scarabaidae)活动具有更高的时间保真度

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY Coleopterists Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1649/0010-065X-77.1.1
T. Heddle, Z. Hemmings, N. Andrew
{"title":"一种诱饵时间排序陷阱,使Dung Beetle(鞘翅目:Scarabaidae)活动具有更高的时间保真度","authors":"T. Heddle, Z. Hemmings, N. Andrew","doi":"10.1649/0010-065X-77.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The diel activity of dung beetles is poorly understood in Australia. Understanding diel activity is fundamental to understanding the ecology and management of these insects. The diel activity is typically measured using ground-based pitfall traps, which require manual changing. Here we showcase a time sorting pitfall trap (TSPT) that allows for automated time sorted sampling of dung beetle communities to help investigate diel activity and determine abiotic triggers of diel activity. Testing was undertaken to determine the following: 1) Can the TSPT capture dung beetles at eight (3-hr interval) time points throughout a 24-hr period? 2) How efficiently can the TSPT capture dung beetles compared to a ground-based pan trap? 3) How does the height of the TSPT (standing vs. buried) affect the species diversity and abundance? We found that the TSPT successfully captured dung beetles at different time intervals, providing an assessment of beetle activity. We provide examples from two locally abundant dung beetles species, Labarrus lividus (Olivier, 1789) (Aphodiinae) and Onthophagus binodis (Thunberg, 1818) (Scarabaeinae). The height of the TSPT negatively influenced species diversity and abundance compared to ground-based pan traps. When we compared the results of pan traps and the equivalent of a buried TSPT (TSPT lid with pan trap underneath set at ground height), no difference was detected in overall species diversity, yet abundance was still reduced. When the height of the TSPT was reduced, only 20% of the abundance was captured compared to the ground pan trap. Overall, the TSPT worked for the intended purpose of measuring diel activity though it should be buried or have its height reduced to improve capture rate.","PeriodicalId":50668,"journal":{"name":"Coleopterists Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Baited Time Sorting Pitfall Trap Allowing More Temporal Fidelity of Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Activity\",\"authors\":\"T. Heddle, Z. Hemmings, N. Andrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1649/0010-065X-77.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The diel activity of dung beetles is poorly understood in Australia. Understanding diel activity is fundamental to understanding the ecology and management of these insects. The diel activity is typically measured using ground-based pitfall traps, which require manual changing. Here we showcase a time sorting pitfall trap (TSPT) that allows for automated time sorted sampling of dung beetle communities to help investigate diel activity and determine abiotic triggers of diel activity. Testing was undertaken to determine the following: 1) Can the TSPT capture dung beetles at eight (3-hr interval) time points throughout a 24-hr period? 2) How efficiently can the TSPT capture dung beetles compared to a ground-based pan trap? 3) How does the height of the TSPT (standing vs. buried) affect the species diversity and abundance? We found that the TSPT successfully captured dung beetles at different time intervals, providing an assessment of beetle activity. We provide examples from two locally abundant dung beetles species, Labarrus lividus (Olivier, 1789) (Aphodiinae) and Onthophagus binodis (Thunberg, 1818) (Scarabaeinae). The height of the TSPT negatively influenced species diversity and abundance compared to ground-based pan traps. When we compared the results of pan traps and the equivalent of a buried TSPT (TSPT lid with pan trap underneath set at ground height), no difference was detected in overall species diversity, yet abundance was still reduced. When the height of the TSPT was reduced, only 20% of the abundance was captured compared to the ground pan trap. Overall, the TSPT worked for the intended purpose of measuring diel activity though it should be buried or have its height reduced to improve capture rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coleopterists Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coleopterists Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-77.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coleopterists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-77.1.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在澳大利亚,人们对金龟子的昼夜活动知之甚少。了解diel的活动是了解这些昆虫的生态学和管理的基础。diel活动通常使用地面陷阱进行测量,这需要手动更换。在这里,我们展示了一种时间排序陷阱(TSPT),它允许对粪甲虫群落进行自动时间排序采样,以帮助调查介电活性并确定介电活性的非生物触发因素。进行测试以确定以下内容:1)TSPT能否在24小时内的八个时间点(间隔3小时)捕获甲虫?2) 与地面的潘诱捕器相比,TSPT捕捉甲虫的效率有多高?3) TSPT的高度(站立与掩埋)如何影响物种多样性和丰度?我们发现,TSPT在不同的时间间隔成功捕获了甲虫,从而对甲虫的活动进行了评估。我们提供了两个当地丰富的甲虫物种的例子,Labarrus lividus(Olivier,1789)(Aphodinae)和Onthophagus binodis(Thunberg,1818)(Scarabainae)。与地面泛捕集器相比,TSPT的高度对物种多样性和丰度产生了负面影响。当我们比较潘陷阱和埋在地下的TSPT(TSPT盖子和下面设置在地面高度的潘陷阱)的结果时,没有发现总体物种多样性的差异,但丰度仍然降低。当TSPT的高度降低时,与地盘陷阱相比,只有20%的丰度被捕获。总的来说,TSPT达到了测量电介质活性的预期目的,尽管它应该被掩埋或降低高度以提高捕获率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Baited Time Sorting Pitfall Trap Allowing More Temporal Fidelity of Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Activity
Abstract The diel activity of dung beetles is poorly understood in Australia. Understanding diel activity is fundamental to understanding the ecology and management of these insects. The diel activity is typically measured using ground-based pitfall traps, which require manual changing. Here we showcase a time sorting pitfall trap (TSPT) that allows for automated time sorted sampling of dung beetle communities to help investigate diel activity and determine abiotic triggers of diel activity. Testing was undertaken to determine the following: 1) Can the TSPT capture dung beetles at eight (3-hr interval) time points throughout a 24-hr period? 2) How efficiently can the TSPT capture dung beetles compared to a ground-based pan trap? 3) How does the height of the TSPT (standing vs. buried) affect the species diversity and abundance? We found that the TSPT successfully captured dung beetles at different time intervals, providing an assessment of beetle activity. We provide examples from two locally abundant dung beetles species, Labarrus lividus (Olivier, 1789) (Aphodiinae) and Onthophagus binodis (Thunberg, 1818) (Scarabaeinae). The height of the TSPT negatively influenced species diversity and abundance compared to ground-based pan traps. When we compared the results of pan traps and the equivalent of a buried TSPT (TSPT lid with pan trap underneath set at ground height), no difference was detected in overall species diversity, yet abundance was still reduced. When the height of the TSPT was reduced, only 20% of the abundance was captured compared to the ground pan trap. Overall, the TSPT worked for the intended purpose of measuring diel activity though it should be buried or have its height reduced to improve capture rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coleopterists Bulletin
Coleopterists Bulletin 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Founded in 1947 by Ross H. Arnett, Jr., The Coleopterists Bulletin is a refereed quarterly journal, which includes a wide variety of articles on taxonomy and ecology of beetles (Coleoptera). Both members and non-members may submit manuscripts for consideration for publication.
期刊最新文献
Reproductive Interference between Native and Introduced Lady Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Puerto Rico New Onthophiline Fossil Species (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Onthophilinae) from Mid-Cretaceous Burmese Amber The Coleopterists Society Graduate Student Research Enhancement Awards and Undergraduate Travel Award 2023 Recipients A Morphologically Divergent New Genus and Species of Eurygeniinae from California, USA (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) A New Species of Urophorus (Anophorus) Kirejtshuk, 1990 (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) from Ishigaki-Jima Island, Southern Ryukyu, Southwestern Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1