衡量欧盟理事会主席的成功

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Croatian International Relations Review Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.37173/cirr.26.87.2
Igor Vidačak, Tomislav Milošić
{"title":"衡量欧盟理事会主席的成功","authors":"Igor Vidačak, Tomislav Milošić","doi":"10.37173/cirr.26.87.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This\npaper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on criteria for measuring the\nperformance of the rotating Presidencies of the Council of the EU. The\ncomparison between Austria and Croatia, two countries that concluded the two\nmost recent Council Presidency Trios, can be illustrative in identifying the\nmain factors that can influence the overall performance of rotating Presidencies.\nBased on the series of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the overall\nscore of both countries’ Presidencies turned to be positive, despite some\nfailures of these Presidencies to demonstrate a firm commitment to fundamental\nEU values. In view of the lack of evaluations of the Council Presidencies based\non verifiable, measurable indicators, this paper seeks to contribute to the\ndevelopment of a more objective methodological framework for the assessment of the\nfuture Presidencies of the Council as a still under-researched area within EU\nstudies.","PeriodicalId":35243,"journal":{"name":"Croatian International Relations Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Success of the Presidency of the Council of the EU\",\"authors\":\"Igor Vidačak, Tomislav Milošić\",\"doi\":\"10.37173/cirr.26.87.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This\\npaper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on criteria for measuring the\\nperformance of the rotating Presidencies of the Council of the EU. The\\ncomparison between Austria and Croatia, two countries that concluded the two\\nmost recent Council Presidency Trios, can be illustrative in identifying the\\nmain factors that can influence the overall performance of rotating Presidencies.\\nBased on the series of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the overall\\nscore of both countries’ Presidencies turned to be positive, despite some\\nfailures of these Presidencies to demonstrate a firm commitment to fundamental\\nEU values. In view of the lack of evaluations of the Council Presidencies based\\non verifiable, measurable indicators, this paper seeks to contribute to the\\ndevelopment of a more objective methodological framework for the assessment of the\\nfuture Presidencies of the Council as a still under-researched area within EU\\nstudies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.87.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian International Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.87.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在为目前正在进行的关于衡量欧盟理事会轮值主席绩效标准的辩论做出贡献。奥地利和克罗地亚是最近两次安理会主席三人组的缔结国,这两个国家之间的比较可以说明影响轮值主席总体表现的主要因素。基于一系列定量和定性指标,两国主席的总体得分都为正,尽管这些总统未能表现出对欧盟基本价值观的坚定承诺。鉴于缺乏基于可核实、可衡量的指标对理事会主席的评估,本文试图为制定一个更客观的方法框架,以评估理事会未来主席的任期做出贡献,这是欧盟研究中一个仍在研究中的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the Success of the Presidency of the Council of the EU
This paper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on criteria for measuring the performance of the rotating Presidencies of the Council of the EU. The comparison between Austria and Croatia, two countries that concluded the two most recent Council Presidency Trios, can be illustrative in identifying the main factors that can influence the overall performance of rotating Presidencies. Based on the series of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the overall score of both countries’ Presidencies turned to be positive, despite some failures of these Presidencies to demonstrate a firm commitment to fundamental EU values. In view of the lack of evaluations of the Council Presidencies based on verifiable, measurable indicators, this paper seeks to contribute to the development of a more objective methodological framework for the assessment of the future Presidencies of the Council as a still under-researched area within EU studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Croatian International Relations Review
Croatian International Relations Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: The Croatian International Relations Review (CIRR) is an interdisciplinary academic journal published in English since 1995 and focuses on political science, sociology, law and economics. Each issue includes scholarly, double-blind peer reviewed articles, and book reviews. CIRR is a member of COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics – and is published electronically by the Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO) in Zagreb. The journal is supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Croatia and is published in collaboration with De Gruyter Open, the world’s second largest publisher of Open Access academic content. CIRR is indexed by 40 scholarly databases, including ESCI, Scopus, Erih Plus, EconLit and Proquest Social Science Premium Collection. Articles reflect the views of their authors only.
期刊最新文献
Measuring the Success of the Presidency of the Council of the EU The Significance of Foreign Military Bases as Instruments of Spheres of Influence How do Lithuanian Citizens Perceive the European Parliament? EU Legitimacy Issue and Trust in the European Parliament On the Norms and Habits of the European Union as a Meta-organisation The Challenges to the Emergency Medical Services to be Recognised as a Human Right in International Human Rights Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1