欧盟对世邦魏理仕恐怖威胁的回应:多渠道方法

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politique Europeenne Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.3917/poeu.065.0148
C. Kaunert, Sarah Léonard
{"title":"欧盟对世邦魏理仕恐怖威胁的回应:多渠道方法","authors":"C. Kaunert, Sarah Léonard","doi":"10.3917/poeu.065.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cet article examine comment l’Union europeenne (UE) a cherche a faire face a la menace du terrorisme chimique, biologique, radiologique ou nucleaire (CBRN) en utilisant le Multiple Streams Framework de Kingdon. Il demontre que l’UE a considerablement developpe sa reponse a la menace terroriste CBRN, mais de maniere fragmentaire. Il fait egalement valoir que, contrairement aux debats intenses sur la menace terroriste CBRN et au grand nombre de propositions politiques qui en ont resulte, l’UE n’a adopte qu’un nombre limite d’instruments de \"droit contraignant\", bien que certains d’entre eux aient eu un impact significatif. Cela contraste avec le vaste corpus de \"soft law\" qui s’est progressivement developpe, malgre toutes ses limites.","PeriodicalId":54026,"journal":{"name":"Politique Europeenne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Union’s Response to the CBRN Terrorist Threat: A Multiple Streams Approach\",\"authors\":\"C. Kaunert, Sarah Léonard\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/poeu.065.0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cet article examine comment l’Union europeenne (UE) a cherche a faire face a la menace du terrorisme chimique, biologique, radiologique ou nucleaire (CBRN) en utilisant le Multiple Streams Framework de Kingdon. Il demontre que l’UE a considerablement developpe sa reponse a la menace terroriste CBRN, mais de maniere fragmentaire. Il fait egalement valoir que, contrairement aux debats intenses sur la menace terroriste CBRN et au grand nombre de propositions politiques qui en ont resulte, l’UE n’a adopte qu’un nombre limite d’instruments de \\\"droit contraignant\\\", bien que certains d’entre eux aient eu un impact significatif. Cela contraste avec le vaste corpus de \\\"soft law\\\" qui s’est progressivement developpe, malgre toutes ses limites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politique Europeenne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politique Europeenne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.065.0148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politique Europeenne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.065.0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了欧盟(EU)如何利用Kingdon的多流框架应对化学、生物、放射性或核恐怖主义(CBRN)的威胁。它表明,欧盟对CBRN恐怖主义威胁的应对措施已经大大扩大,但只是零碎的。它还认为,与关于CBRN恐怖主义威胁的激烈辩论和由此产生的大量政策建议相反,欧盟只通过了数量有限的“具有约束力的法律”文书,尽管其中一些文书产生了重大影响。这与逐渐发展的大量“软法律”形成对比,尽管其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The European Union’s Response to the CBRN Terrorist Threat: A Multiple Streams Approach
Cet article examine comment l’Union europeenne (UE) a cherche a faire face a la menace du terrorisme chimique, biologique, radiologique ou nucleaire (CBRN) en utilisant le Multiple Streams Framework de Kingdon. Il demontre que l’UE a considerablement developpe sa reponse a la menace terroriste CBRN, mais de maniere fragmentaire. Il fait egalement valoir que, contrairement aux debats intenses sur la menace terroriste CBRN et au grand nombre de propositions politiques qui en ont resulte, l’UE n’a adopte qu’un nombre limite d’instruments de "droit contraignant", bien que certains d’entre eux aient eu un impact significatif. Cela contraste avec le vaste corpus de "soft law" qui s’est progressivement developpe, malgre toutes ses limites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politique Europeenne
Politique Europeenne POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Politique européenne is a bilingual (French/English) journal, which publishes original articles in thematic or varia issues covering the entire field of European Studies (policy analysis, international relations, political sociology, political theory or political anthropology…). Each issue also includes a on-going research articles, as well as book reviews and review essays. The ambition of the journal is to constitute of the key arenas for expressing scientific controversies on European Studies. Starting with the observation that academic contributions relating to the political analysis of the process of European integration had primarily been dominated by English-language journal, the aims of the journal are the following: accompany the development of political science as one of the main and autonomous discipline in the analysis of the many dimensions of the process of European integration, make available to observers (academics, students and journalists) and actors (political, administrative and economic) of the European Union a journal of high scientific quality that allows to take stock of the academic debates, help enhance exchanges between universities and research centers in France and abroad. Through its thematic and varia issues, Politique européenne offers an editorial policy which allows to establish the necessary bridge between theory and practice in the study of the EU in all its dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Lucy Kinski, European Representation in EU National Parliaments, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. A reaction to the French “non”? Or a case of institutional bricolage? Gabriele Abels, Andrea Krizsán, Heather MacRae and Anna van der Vleuten (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics, London, Routledge, 2021. Corporate power and the resolution of the Eurozone crisis Beyond Dichotomies: Defining Europeanness in a ‘Limit-Experience’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1