欧盟对世邦魏理仕恐怖威胁的回应：多渠道方法

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politique Europeenne Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.3917/poeu.065.0148

C. Kaunert, Sarah Léonard

{"title":"欧盟对世邦魏理仕恐怖威胁的回应：多渠道方法","authors":"C. Kaunert, Sarah Léonard","doi":"10.3917/poeu.065.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cet article examine comment l’Union europeenne (UE) a cherche a faire face a la menace du terrorisme chimique, biologique, radiologique ou nucleaire (CBRN) en utilisant le Multiple Streams Framework de Kingdon. Il demontre que l’UE a considerablement developpe sa reponse a la menace terroriste CBRN, mais de maniere fragmentaire. Il fait egalement valoir que, contrairement aux debats intenses sur la menace terroriste CBRN et au grand nombre de propositions politiques qui en ont resulte, l’UE n’a adopte qu’un nombre limite d’instruments de \"droit contraignant\", bien que certains d’entre eux aient eu un impact significatif. Cela contraste avec le vaste corpus de \"soft law\" qui s’est progressivement developpe, malgre toutes ses limites.","PeriodicalId":54026,"journal":{"name":"Politique Europeenne","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Union’s Response to the CBRN Terrorist Threat: A Multiple Streams Approach\",\"authors\":\"C. Kaunert, Sarah Léonard\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/poeu.065.0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cet article examine comment l’Union europeenne (UE) a cherche a faire face a la menace du terrorisme chimique, biologique, radiologique ou nucleaire (CBRN) en utilisant le Multiple Streams Framework de Kingdon. Il demontre que l’UE a considerablement developpe sa reponse a la menace terroriste CBRN, mais de maniere fragmentaire. Il fait egalement valoir que, contrairement aux debats intenses sur la menace terroriste CBRN et au grand nombre de propositions politiques qui en ont resulte, l’UE n’a adopte qu’un nombre limite d’instruments de \\\"droit contraignant\\\", bien que certains d’entre eux aient eu un impact significatif. Cela contraste avec le vaste corpus de \\\"soft law\\\" qui s’est progressivement developpe, malgre toutes ses limites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politique Europeenne\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politique Europeenne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.065.0148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politique Europeenne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.065.0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了欧盟（EU）如何利用Kingdon的多流框架应对化学、生物、放射性或核恐怖主义（CBRN）的威胁。它表明，欧盟对CBRN恐怖主义威胁的应对措施已经大大扩大，但只是零碎的。它还认为，与关于CBRN恐怖主义威胁的激烈辩论和由此产生的大量政策建议相反，欧盟只通过了数量有限的“具有约束力的法律”文书，尽管其中一些文书产生了重大影响。这与逐渐发展的大量“软法律”形成对比，尽管其局限性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The European Union’s Response to the CBRN Terrorist Threat: A Multiple Streams Approach

Cet article examine comment l’Union europeenne (UE) a cherche a faire face a la menace du terrorisme chimique, biologique, radiologique ou nucleaire (CBRN) en utilisant le Multiple Streams Framework de Kingdon. Il demontre que l’UE a considerablement developpe sa reponse a la menace terroriste CBRN, mais de maniere fragmentaire. Il fait egalement valoir que, contrairement aux debats intenses sur la menace terroriste CBRN et au grand nombre de propositions politiques qui en ont resulte, l’UE n’a adopte qu’un nombre limite d’instruments de "droit contraignant", bien que certains d’entre eux aient eu un impact significatif. Cela contraste avec le vaste corpus de "soft law" qui s’est progressivement developpe, malgre toutes ses limites.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Politique Europeenne POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Politique européenne is a bilingual (French/English) journal, which publishes original articles in thematic or varia issues covering the entire field of European Studies (policy analysis, international relations, political sociology, political theory or political anthropology…). Each issue also includes a on-going research articles, as well as book reviews and review essays. The ambition of the journal is to constitute of the key arenas for expressing scientific controversies on European Studies. Starting with the observation that academic contributions relating to the political analysis of the process of European integration had primarily been dominated by English-language journal, the aims of the journal are the following: accompany the development of political science as one of the main and autonomous discipline in the analysis of the many dimensions of the process of European integration, make available to observers (academics, students and journalists) and actors (political, administrative and economic) of the European Union a journal of high scientific quality that allows to take stock of the academic debates, help enhance exchanges between universities and research centers in France and abroad. Through its thematic and varia issues, Politique européenne offers an editorial policy which allows to establish the necessary bridge between theory and practice in the study of the EU in all its dimensions.