监管、分配和再分配政策的叙事情节

IF 2.7 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2021-07-21 DOI:10.1002/epa2.1127
Johanna Kuhlmann, Sonja Blum
{"title":"监管、分配和再分配政策的叙事情节","authors":"Johanna Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Sonja Blum","doi":"10.1002/epa2.1127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) has ignited a remarkably active research community, one of its main contributions being distinct narrative elements—including settings, characters, and plots. Yet, while the plot constitutes a core element of narrativity, it has received less attention vis-à-vis other narrative components. Existing classifications of plots have been proven to possess a great ability to capture “universal” policy stories, but not the specific variations of different <i>types</i> of policies. This article presents a typology of plots by linking their universal and policy-specific themes, thereby theorizing from Lowi's seminal typology of regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies. Empirically, it focuses on the political communication of Germany's policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy narratives were mined from Twitter and from governmental press conferences (March–June 2020). The qualitative NPF analysis demonstrates that the identified plots—<i>restricting-to-control</i>, <i>liberating-to-promote</i>, <i>providing-to-promote</i>, <i>giving-to-give</i>, and <i>giving-to-promote</i>—can grasp different regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies as well as their variety.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"7 S2","pages":"276-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1127","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrative plots for regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Sonja Blum\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epa2.1127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) has ignited a remarkably active research community, one of its main contributions being distinct narrative elements—including settings, characters, and plots. Yet, while the plot constitutes a core element of narrativity, it has received less attention vis-à-vis other narrative components. Existing classifications of plots have been proven to possess a great ability to capture “universal” policy stories, but not the specific variations of different <i>types</i> of policies. This article presents a typology of plots by linking their universal and policy-specific themes, thereby theorizing from Lowi's seminal typology of regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies. Empirically, it focuses on the political communication of Germany's policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy narratives were mined from Twitter and from governmental press conferences (March–June 2020). The qualitative NPF analysis demonstrates that the identified plots—<i>restricting-to-control</i>, <i>liberating-to-promote</i>, <i>providing-to-promote</i>, <i>giving-to-give</i>, and <i>giving-to-promote</i>—can grasp different regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies as well as their variety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Policy Analysis\",\"volume\":\"7 S2\",\"pages\":\"276-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1127\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Policy Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

叙事政策框架(NPF)引发了一个非常活跃的研究社区,其主要贡献之一是独特的叙事元素,包括背景、人物和情节。然而,尽管情节构成了叙事的核心元素,但与其他叙事成分相比,它受到的关注较少。现有的情节分类已被证明具有捕捉“普遍”政策故事的强大能力,但不能捕捉不同类型政策的具体变化。本文通过将其普遍主题和政策特定主题联系起来,提出了一种情节类型,从而从洛伊对监管、分配和再分配政策的开创性类型学中进行理论推导。从经验上讲,它侧重于德国应对新冠肺炎疫情政策的政治沟通。政策叙述是从推特和政府新闻发布会(2020年3月至6月)中挖掘出来的。定性NPF分析表明,确定的限制控制、解放促进、提供促进、给予给予和给予促进的地块可以掌握不同的监管、分配和再分配政策及其多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Narrative plots for regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies

The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) has ignited a remarkably active research community, one of its main contributions being distinct narrative elements—including settings, characters, and plots. Yet, while the plot constitutes a core element of narrativity, it has received less attention vis-à-vis other narrative components. Existing classifications of plots have been proven to possess a great ability to capture “universal” policy stories, but not the specific variations of different types of policies. This article presents a typology of plots by linking their universal and policy-specific themes, thereby theorizing from Lowi's seminal typology of regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies. Empirically, it focuses on the political communication of Germany's policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy narratives were mined from Twitter and from governmental press conferences (March–June 2020). The qualitative NPF analysis demonstrates that the identified plots—restricting-to-control, liberating-to-promote, providing-to-promote, giving-to-give, and giving-to-promote—can grasp different regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies as well as their variety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Issue Information What determines effectiveness in the policy process? Is open strategy a good fit for Public-Private hybrid organizations? Triggering policy learning via formal EU evaluation requirements in the case of Cohesion Policy Between institutions and narratives: Understanding collective action in innovation policy processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1