“一个领域的推荐人”:学生事务专业人员如何思考对实践的外部需求的扎根理论分析

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of College Student Development Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1353/csd.2023.a901168
Ezekiel W. Kimball, Rachel E. Friedensen, Andrew G. Ryder
{"title":"“一个领域的推荐人”:学生事务专业人员如何思考对实践的外部需求的扎根理论分析","authors":"Ezekiel W. Kimball, Rachel E. Friedensen, Andrew G. Ryder","doi":"10.1353/csd.2023.a901168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Student affairs professionals face increasing pressure from ideologies, people, and organizations outside of higher education institutions. Historically, student affairs practice has been focused on student development theory. In this constructivist grounded theory study, we explore this tension using interviews with 21 early-career, mid-level, and senior student affairs practitioners. Our findings highlight the complex forces now shaping student affairs practice, including external demands related to (a) efficacy and efficiency of student services; (b) compliance with local, state, and federal laws; and (c) student and public relations crises. We theorize these pressures relative to Foucault’s thinking about surveillance and self-regulation within total institutional spaces, using these ideas to offer new insight into student affairs practice.","PeriodicalId":15454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Development","volume":"64 1","pages":"257 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Referees on a Field:” A Grounded Theory Analysis of How Student Affairs Professionals Think About External Demands on Practice\",\"authors\":\"Ezekiel W. Kimball, Rachel E. Friedensen, Andrew G. Ryder\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/csd.2023.a901168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Student affairs professionals face increasing pressure from ideologies, people, and organizations outside of higher education institutions. Historically, student affairs practice has been focused on student development theory. In this constructivist grounded theory study, we explore this tension using interviews with 21 early-career, mid-level, and senior student affairs practitioners. Our findings highlight the complex forces now shaping student affairs practice, including external demands related to (a) efficacy and efficiency of student services; (b) compliance with local, state, and federal laws; and (c) student and public relations crises. We theorize these pressures relative to Foucault’s thinking about surveillance and self-regulation within total institutional spaces, using these ideas to offer new insight into student affairs practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Student Development\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"257 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Student Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.a901168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.a901168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:学生事务专业人员面临着来自高等教育机构之外的意识形态、人员和组织的越来越大的压力。历史上,学生事务实践一直关注学生发展理论。在这项以建构主义为基础的理论研究中,我们通过对21名早期、中期和高级学生事务从业者的采访来探讨这种紧张关系。我们的研究结果强调了目前影响学生事务实践的复杂力量,包括与以下方面有关的外部需求:(a)学生服务的有效性和效率;(b) 遵守地方、州和联邦法律;以及(c)学生和公共关系危机。我们将这些压力与福柯关于在整个制度空间内监督和自我调节的思想联系起来,并利用这些思想为学生事务实践提供新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Referees on a Field:” A Grounded Theory Analysis of How Student Affairs Professionals Think About External Demands on Practice
Abstract:Student affairs professionals face increasing pressure from ideologies, people, and organizations outside of higher education institutions. Historically, student affairs practice has been focused on student development theory. In this constructivist grounded theory study, we explore this tension using interviews with 21 early-career, mid-level, and senior student affairs practitioners. Our findings highlight the complex forces now shaping student affairs practice, including external demands related to (a) efficacy and efficiency of student services; (b) compliance with local, state, and federal laws; and (c) student and public relations crises. We theorize these pressures relative to Foucault’s thinking about surveillance and self-regulation within total institutional spaces, using these ideas to offer new insight into student affairs practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Published six times per year for the American College Personnel Association.Founded in 1959, the Journal of College Student Development has been the leading source of research about college students and the field of student affairs for over four decades. JCSD is the largest empirical research journal in the field of student affairs and higher education, and is the official journal of the American College Personnel Association.
期刊最新文献
Black Men's Belongingness at Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Examining the Campus Environment and Culturally Engaging Practices Latina Undergraduates on the Path to Becoming Exitosas on Their Own Terms Messaging About Race: Exploring Sorority and Fraternity Social Media Test-Free Admissions at Selective Institutions: Perspectives From Admissions Professionals Negotiation Spaces: Interrogating Black Men Doctoral Students' Experiences Using Cross and Fhagen-Smith's Black Identity Development Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1