阅读建筑:建筑的文本转向与文学研究中的空间转向平行

Q4 Arts and Humanities Ars Aeterna Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2478/aa-2022-0006
Tereza Topolovská
{"title":"阅读建筑:建筑的文本转向与文学研究中的空间转向平行","authors":"Tereza Topolovská","doi":"10.2478/aa-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article seeks to explore the parallels between the spatial turn embraced by contemporary literary theory and the so-called textual turn in architecture. More specifically, links between the contemporary developments of architectural theory and practice and literary criticism are established. In order to highlight the nature and origin of the connection between these two contemporary tendencies, this paper draws on a number of authoritative texts of both literary criticism as well as architectural theory, predominantly within the Anglo-American context. Architecture is presented from the viewpoint of the 20th and 21st centuries, which accentuates its liberation from a purely formal understanding by emphasizing the human involvement in its interpretation. The conception and structuring of physical spaces are therefore regarded as conditioned by processes similar to those involved in the construction of meaning in language and literature. Thus, while literary studies benefits from the extension of its field of study through the inclusion (and contemporary primacy) of the spatial point of view, architectural criticism invites active participation in the construction of its meaning, in other words, its reading. The processes of the mutual influencing and enrichment of both the textual turn in architecture and the spatial turn in literary studies is exemplified by means of contemporary architectural works that embody the synergic relationship of the two traditionally separate fields – (literary) text and architecture.","PeriodicalId":37754,"journal":{"name":"Ars Aeterna","volume":"14 1","pages":"58 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading buildings: The textual turn of architecture as a parallel to the spatial turn in literary studiesi\",\"authors\":\"Tereza Topolovská\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aa-2022-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article seeks to explore the parallels between the spatial turn embraced by contemporary literary theory and the so-called textual turn in architecture. More specifically, links between the contemporary developments of architectural theory and practice and literary criticism are established. In order to highlight the nature and origin of the connection between these two contemporary tendencies, this paper draws on a number of authoritative texts of both literary criticism as well as architectural theory, predominantly within the Anglo-American context. Architecture is presented from the viewpoint of the 20th and 21st centuries, which accentuates its liberation from a purely formal understanding by emphasizing the human involvement in its interpretation. The conception and structuring of physical spaces are therefore regarded as conditioned by processes similar to those involved in the construction of meaning in language and literature. Thus, while literary studies benefits from the extension of its field of study through the inclusion (and contemporary primacy) of the spatial point of view, architectural criticism invites active participation in the construction of its meaning, in other words, its reading. The processes of the mutual influencing and enrichment of both the textual turn in architecture and the spatial turn in literary studies is exemplified by means of contemporary architectural works that embody the synergic relationship of the two traditionally separate fields – (literary) text and architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars Aeterna\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"58 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars Aeterna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aa-2022-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Aeterna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aa-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在探讨当代文学理论所拥抱的空间转向与建筑中所谓的文本转向之间的相似之处。更具体地说,建立了建筑理论和实践的当代发展与文学批评之间的联系。为了突出这两种当代趋势之间联系的本质和起源,本文借鉴了英美语境下的文学批评和建筑理论的权威文本。建筑从20世纪和21世纪的角度呈现,通过强调人类参与其解释,强调其从纯粹的形式理解中解放出来。因此,物理空间的概念和结构被认为是由类似于语言和文学中意义构建的过程所制约的。因此,虽然文学研究受益于其研究领域的扩展,通过空间观点的包容(和当代首要地位),建筑批评邀请积极参与其意义的构建,换句话说,它的阅读。建筑的文本转向和文学研究的空间转向相互影响和丰富的过程,通过当代建筑作品体现了两个传统上独立的领域——(文学)文本和建筑的协同关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading buildings: The textual turn of architecture as a parallel to the spatial turn in literary studiesi
Abstract This article seeks to explore the parallels between the spatial turn embraced by contemporary literary theory and the so-called textual turn in architecture. More specifically, links between the contemporary developments of architectural theory and practice and literary criticism are established. In order to highlight the nature and origin of the connection between these two contemporary tendencies, this paper draws on a number of authoritative texts of both literary criticism as well as architectural theory, predominantly within the Anglo-American context. Architecture is presented from the viewpoint of the 20th and 21st centuries, which accentuates its liberation from a purely formal understanding by emphasizing the human involvement in its interpretation. The conception and structuring of physical spaces are therefore regarded as conditioned by processes similar to those involved in the construction of meaning in language and literature. Thus, while literary studies benefits from the extension of its field of study through the inclusion (and contemporary primacy) of the spatial point of view, architectural criticism invites active participation in the construction of its meaning, in other words, its reading. The processes of the mutual influencing and enrichment of both the textual turn in architecture and the spatial turn in literary studies is exemplified by means of contemporary architectural works that embody the synergic relationship of the two traditionally separate fields – (literary) text and architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ars Aeterna
Ars Aeterna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary journal focused on the questions of art and its importance in the contemporary world for the development of culture, mutual understanding, and the human Self.
期刊最新文献
Shhh!: Whisper cycle in John Crowley’s rendition of Samuel Beckett’s Come and Go Technological imagination as a source of the culture of neural networks The foreign atmosphere of Africa as part of magical expression in the fiction of Marek Vadas The Hillbilly Stereotype in Horror Comics The “own” vs the “foreign” in the German translation of Pavol Rankov’s novel Svätý mäsiar zo Šamorína a iné príbehy z čias Malej dunajskej vojny1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1