自我效能感维度与求职策略

IF 1.3 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erap.2021.100748

Isabelle Fort , Flora Puget

{"title":"自我效能感维度与求职策略","authors":"Isabelle Fort , Flora Puget","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2021.100748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored the paths between dimensions of self-efficacy and job search strategies. An examination of social cognitive career theory and career adaptability enabled us to consider several paths between dimensions of self-efficacy and job search strategies, as well as among self-efficacy dimensions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Scales measuring these concepts were administered to a sample of 120 jobseekers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Structural analyses allowed us to confirm expected paths. Barrier coping efficacy is significantly related to career decision self-efficacy. Career decision self-efficacy and job search self-efficacy are related to exploratory strategy and to job search strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results are discussed with reference to the literature and in terms of practical implications. They highlight the need to implement interventions in order to increase barrier coping efficacy and career decision self-efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"72 3","pages":"Article 100748"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-efficacy dimensions and job search strategies\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Fort , Flora Puget\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erap.2021.100748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored the paths between dimensions of self-efficacy and job search strategies. An examination of social cognitive career theory and career adaptability enabled us to consider several paths between dimensions of self-efficacy and job search strategies, as well as among self-efficacy dimensions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Scales measuring these concepts were administered to a sample of 120 jobseekers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Structural analyses allowed us to confirm expected paths. Barrier coping efficacy is significantly related to career decision self-efficacy. Career decision self-efficacy and job search self-efficacy are related to exploratory strategy and to job search strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results are discussed with reference to the literature and in terms of practical implications. They highlight the need to implement interventions in order to increase barrier coping efficacy and career decision self-efficacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908821001262\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908821001262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

目的探讨自我效能感各维度与求职策略之间的关系。通过对社会认知职业理论和职业适应性的考察，我们可以考虑自我效能感各维度与求职策略之间以及自我效能感各维度之间的若干路径。方法对120名求职者进行了这些概念的测量。结构分析使我们能够确定预期的路径。障碍应对效能与职业决策自我效能显著相关。职业决策自我效能感和求职自我效能感与探索性策略和求职策略有关。结论结合文献和实际意义对研究结果进行了讨论。他们强调需要实施干预措施，以提高障碍应对效能和职业决策自我效能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Self-efficacy dimensions and job search strategies

Objective

This study explored the paths between dimensions of self-efficacy and job search strategies. An examination of social cognitive career theory and career adaptability enabled us to consider several paths between dimensions of self-efficacy and job search strategies, as well as among self-efficacy dimensions.

Method

Scales measuring these concepts were administered to a sample of 120 jobseekers.

Results

Structural analyses allowed us to confirm expected paths. Barrier coping efficacy is significantly related to career decision self-efficacy. Career decision self-efficacy and job search self-efficacy are related to exploratory strategy and to job search strategy.

Conclusion

Results are discussed with reference to the literature and in terms of practical implications. They highlight the need to implement interventions in order to increase barrier coping efficacy and career decision self-efficacy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.