巴基斯坦人口稠密城市上空多卫星气溶胶光学深度产物的比较

F. Butt, M. Shahzad, Seemab Khalid, Nadeem Iqbal, A. Rasheed, G. Raza
{"title":"巴基斯坦人口稠密城市上空多卫星气溶胶光学深度产物的比较","authors":"F. Butt, M. Shahzad, Seemab Khalid, Nadeem Iqbal, A. Rasheed, G. Raza","doi":"10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/ILNS.69.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Air pollution in Pakistan is causing damage to health, environment and quality of life. Air pollution in Pakistan is not effectively monitored due to heavy cost involved in setting up ground stations. However, Satellite remote sensing can effectively monitor the air pollution in terms of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) at regional as well as global level. However, algorithms used to derive AOD from different sensors have some inherited differences which can pose challenges in monitoring regional AOD at high temporal resolution using more than one sensor. Therefore, this study focuses on comparison of four major satellite based AOD products namely Moderate Resolution Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MODIS), Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR), Ozone Monitoring Instrument multiwavelength (OMI) aerosol product and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) with the ground based AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) AOD which is only available from Lahore and Karachi in Pakistan. The correlation of various AOD products with AERONET AOD is estimated statistically through coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), slope and intercept. It is noticed that MODIS is relatively accurate and reliable for monitoring air quality on operational bases over the land cover area of Lahore (R2= 0.78; RMSE = 0.18 ), whereas MISR over the coastal areas of Karachi (R2= 0.82; RMSE = 0.20 ). The results of the study will help the stakeholders in planning additional ground stations for operational monitoring of air quality at regional level.","PeriodicalId":14407,"journal":{"name":"International Letters of Natural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Aerosol Optical Depth Products from Multi-Satellites over Densely Populated Cities of Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"F. Butt, M. Shahzad, Seemab Khalid, Nadeem Iqbal, A. Rasheed, G. Raza\",\"doi\":\"10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/ILNS.69.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Air pollution in Pakistan is causing damage to health, environment and quality of life. Air pollution in Pakistan is not effectively monitored due to heavy cost involved in setting up ground stations. However, Satellite remote sensing can effectively monitor the air pollution in terms of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) at regional as well as global level. However, algorithms used to derive AOD from different sensors have some inherited differences which can pose challenges in monitoring regional AOD at high temporal resolution using more than one sensor. Therefore, this study focuses on comparison of four major satellite based AOD products namely Moderate Resolution Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MODIS), Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR), Ozone Monitoring Instrument multiwavelength (OMI) aerosol product and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) with the ground based AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) AOD which is only available from Lahore and Karachi in Pakistan. The correlation of various AOD products with AERONET AOD is estimated statistically through coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), slope and intercept. It is noticed that MODIS is relatively accurate and reliable for monitoring air quality on operational bases over the land cover area of Lahore (R2= 0.78; RMSE = 0.18 ), whereas MISR over the coastal areas of Karachi (R2= 0.82; RMSE = 0.20 ). The results of the study will help the stakeholders in planning additional ground stations for operational monitoring of air quality at regional level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Letters of Natural Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Letters of Natural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/ILNS.69.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Letters of Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/ILNS.69.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

巴基斯坦的空气污染正在对健康、环境和生活质量造成损害。由于建立地面站的费用高昂,巴基斯坦的空气污染没有得到有效监测。然而,卫星遥感可以在区域和全球层面上有效地监测大气污染的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)。然而,用于从不同传感器获取AOD的算法存在一些遗传差异,这对使用多个传感器在高时间分辨率下监测区域AOD构成了挑战。因此,本研究重点比较了四种主要的卫星AOD产品,即中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)、多角度成像光谱仪(MISR)、臭氧监测仪器多波长(OMI)气溶胶产品和云气溶胶激光雷达和红外探路者卫星观测(CALIPSO)与地面气溶胶机器人网络(AERONET) AOD的对比,后者仅在巴基斯坦拉合尔和卡拉奇提供。通过决定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)、斜率和截距统计估计各AOD产品与AERONET AOD的相关性。值得注意的是,MODIS在拉合尔陆地覆盖区域的作战基地监测空气质量是相对准确和可靠的(R2= 0.78;RMSE = 0.18),而卡拉奇沿海地区的MISR (R2= 0.82;Rmse = 0.20)。研究结果将有助有关人士规划更多地面站,以便在区域一级监测空气质素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Aerosol Optical Depth Products from Multi-Satellites over Densely Populated Cities of Pakistan
Air pollution in Pakistan is causing damage to health, environment and quality of life. Air pollution in Pakistan is not effectively monitored due to heavy cost involved in setting up ground stations. However, Satellite remote sensing can effectively monitor the air pollution in terms of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) at regional as well as global level. However, algorithms used to derive AOD from different sensors have some inherited differences which can pose challenges in monitoring regional AOD at high temporal resolution using more than one sensor. Therefore, this study focuses on comparison of four major satellite based AOD products namely Moderate Resolution Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MODIS), Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR), Ozone Monitoring Instrument multiwavelength (OMI) aerosol product and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) with the ground based AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) AOD which is only available from Lahore and Karachi in Pakistan. The correlation of various AOD products with AERONET AOD is estimated statistically through coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), slope and intercept. It is noticed that MODIS is relatively accurate and reliable for monitoring air quality on operational bases over the land cover area of Lahore (R2= 0.78; RMSE = 0.18 ), whereas MISR over the coastal areas of Karachi (R2= 0.82; RMSE = 0.20 ). The results of the study will help the stakeholders in planning additional ground stations for operational monitoring of air quality at regional level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Letters of Natural Sciences
International Letters of Natural Sciences MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterizing Maize Genotypes for Salt Tolerance Using Morphological and Ionic Traits at Seedling Stage Responses of Okra and Soil Microbial Population Changes to the Application of Tithonia Manure   Performance of Test Crosses of Maize Variety Sarhad White with Jalal and Kiramat for Morphological Traits Water Footprint for Garlic under Irrigation Levels and Agrispon Application Low Doses of Imidacloprid Induce Oxidative Stress and Neural Cell Disruption in Earthworm Eisenia fetida
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1