立体定向放射治疗与分级放射治疗早期支气管肺类癌的比较

IF 0.9 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung Cancer Management Pub Date : 2019-08-21 DOI:10.2217/lmt-2019-0003
R. Wegner, S. Abel, Z. Horne, S. Hasan, A. Colonias, V. Verma
{"title":"立体定向放射治疗与分级放射治疗早期支气管肺类癌的比较","authors":"R. Wegner, S. Abel, Z. Horne, S. Hasan, A. Colonias, V. Verma","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare trends and outcomes in early stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid (BPC) tumors treated nonoperatively with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods/materials: We queried the National Cancer Database for primary (typical) BPC staged cT1-2N0M0 and treated nonsurgically with lung-directed radiation and ≥1 month of follow-up. Odds ratios were used to predict likelihood of SBRT treatment and multivariable Cox regression determined predictors of survival. Results: Out of 154 patients, 84 (55%) were treated with SBRT and the remainder were treated with CFRT. Although SBRT use was 0% from 2004 to 2007, it varied from 50 to 70% per year thereafter. Propensity-matched Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed improved survival with lung SBRT (median: 66 vs 58 months; p = 0.034). Conclusion: SBRT for early stage, primary BPC has increased over time and was associated with higher survival than CFRT.","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0003","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus fractionated radiation therapy for early-stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid\",\"authors\":\"R. Wegner, S. Abel, Z. Horne, S. Hasan, A. Colonias, V. Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/lmt-2019-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare trends and outcomes in early stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid (BPC) tumors treated nonoperatively with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods/materials: We queried the National Cancer Database for primary (typical) BPC staged cT1-2N0M0 and treated nonsurgically with lung-directed radiation and ≥1 month of follow-up. Odds ratios were used to predict likelihood of SBRT treatment and multivariable Cox regression determined predictors of survival. Results: Out of 154 patients, 84 (55%) were treated with SBRT and the remainder were treated with CFRT. Although SBRT use was 0% from 2004 to 2007, it varied from 50 to 70% per year thereafter. Propensity-matched Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed improved survival with lung SBRT (median: 66 vs 58 months; p = 0.034). Conclusion: SBRT for early stage, primary BPC has increased over time and was associated with higher survival than CFRT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0003\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:比较常规分割放疗(CFRT)和立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)非手术治疗早期支气管肺类癌(BPC)肿瘤的趋势和结果。方法/材料:我们查询了国家癌症数据库中原发性(典型)BPC分期cT1-2N0M0,并通过肺定向放疗和≥1个月的随访进行非手术治疗。比值比用于预测SBRT治疗的可能性,多变量Cox回归确定生存预测因子。结果:154例患者中,84例(55%)接受SBRT治疗,其余患者接受CFRT治疗。尽管SBRT的使用率从2004年到2007年为0%,但此后每年的使用率从50%到70%不等。倾向匹配的Kaplan-Meier分析显示,肺SBRT改善了生存率(中位数:66个月vs 58个月;P = 0.034)。结论:SBRT对早期原发性BPC的治疗随着时间的推移而增加,并且与CFRT相比具有更高的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus fractionated radiation therapy for early-stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid
Aim: To compare trends and outcomes in early stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid (BPC) tumors treated nonoperatively with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods/materials: We queried the National Cancer Database for primary (typical) BPC staged cT1-2N0M0 and treated nonsurgically with lung-directed radiation and ≥1 month of follow-up. Odds ratios were used to predict likelihood of SBRT treatment and multivariable Cox regression determined predictors of survival. Results: Out of 154 patients, 84 (55%) were treated with SBRT and the remainder were treated with CFRT. Although SBRT use was 0% from 2004 to 2007, it varied from 50 to 70% per year thereafter. Propensity-matched Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed improved survival with lung SBRT (median: 66 vs 58 months; p = 0.034). Conclusion: SBRT for early stage, primary BPC has increased over time and was associated with higher survival than CFRT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer Management
Lung Cancer Management RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Survival and quality-of-life outcomes in early-stage NSCLC patients: a literature review of real-world evidence. Alectinib for treating patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC: systematic review and network metanalysis. Real-world outcomes and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC: a single-center experience. Implementing physician education to increase lung cancer screening uptake. Proportion of biopsy specimens containing a tumor when compared to all biopsy specimens by transbronchial biopsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1