公共教育投入中的纵向财政外部性:当联邦政府和州政府有不同的时间视角时

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Research in Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2023.09.001
Hideya Kato , Mitsuyoshi Yanagihara
{"title":"公共教育投入中的纵向财政外部性:当联邦政府和州政府有不同的时间视角时","authors":"Hideya Kato ,&nbsp;Mitsuyoshi Yanagihara","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates how equilibrium under a unitary nation can be achieved through fiscal transfer from (to) the federal government to (from) the state government when both levels of government supply public education to immobile residents under a simple endogenous growth framework fueled by human capital accumulation. We introduce the different time perspectives of both levels of government as a key consideration. Although both levels of government are interested in both the utility level of the present generation and the growth rate that can be attained by accumulating human capital through education, they place different weight on the value of these objectives. We first show that the federal government can replicate the equilibrium outcome that can be achieved under a unitary nation by implementing fiscal transfer between the different levels of government. Second, if the federal government places a large weight on the growth rate, or has a more long-run perspective than the state government, the federal tax rate becomes positive. Third, as the federal government has a stronger long-run perspective, fiscal transfer from the federal government to the state government increases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"77 4","pages":"Pages 518-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertical fiscal externality in public education inputs: When federal and state governments have different time perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Hideya Kato ,&nbsp;Mitsuyoshi Yanagihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rie.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates how equilibrium under a unitary nation can be achieved through fiscal transfer from (to) the federal government to (from) the state government when both levels of government supply public education to immobile residents under a simple endogenous growth framework fueled by human capital accumulation. We introduce the different time perspectives of both levels of government as a key consideration. Although both levels of government are interested in both the utility level of the present generation and the growth rate that can be attained by accumulating human capital through education, they place different weight on the value of these objectives. We first show that the federal government can replicate the equilibrium outcome that can be achieved under a unitary nation by implementing fiscal transfer between the different levels of government. Second, if the federal government places a large weight on the growth rate, or has a more long-run perspective than the state government, the federal tax rate becomes positive. Third, as the federal government has a stronger long-run perspective, fiscal transfer from the federal government to the state government increases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Economics\",\"volume\":\"77 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 518-525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在人力资本积累推动的简单内生增长框架下,当两级政府向固定居民提供公共教育时,如何通过从联邦政府到州政府的财政转移来实现统一国家下的均衡。我们将介绍两级政府不同的时间视角作为关键考虑因素。虽然两级政府都对当代人的效用水平和通过教育积累人力资本所能达到的增长率感兴趣,但它们对这些目标的价值的重视程度不同。我们首先表明,联邦政府可以通过在各级政府之间实施财政转移来复制单一制国家下可以实现的均衡结果。其次,如果联邦政府非常重视增长率,或者比州政府有更长远的眼光,联邦税率就会变为正值。第三,由于联邦政府具有更强的长期视角,联邦政府向州政府的财政转移增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vertical fiscal externality in public education inputs: When federal and state governments have different time perspectives

This study investigates how equilibrium under a unitary nation can be achieved through fiscal transfer from (to) the federal government to (from) the state government when both levels of government supply public education to immobile residents under a simple endogenous growth framework fueled by human capital accumulation. We introduce the different time perspectives of both levels of government as a key consideration. Although both levels of government are interested in both the utility level of the present generation and the growth rate that can be attained by accumulating human capital through education, they place different weight on the value of these objectives. We first show that the federal government can replicate the equilibrium outcome that can be achieved under a unitary nation by implementing fiscal transfer between the different levels of government. Second, if the federal government places a large weight on the growth rate, or has a more long-run perspective than the state government, the federal tax rate becomes positive. Third, as the federal government has a stronger long-run perspective, fiscal transfer from the federal government to the state government increases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
89 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.
期刊最新文献
Bulkiness of goods and the gravity of international trade: Differential impact of trade barriers Oil Price and Long-run Economic Growth in Oil-importing Developing Countries Foreign aid and inequality: Do conflicts matter? The macroeconomic effects of productivity shocks: Predictions of conventional business cycle models are not always incompatible with SSA economies An inquiry into the causes of income differences among high-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1