Bis NEG-D与API 20E在马达加斯加塔那那利佛贝费拉塔纳纳大学医院实验室鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的比较

Z. Rakotovao-Ravahatra, L. Rahajamanana, L. Rakotondraoelina, L. Raskine, S. Rasoanandrasana, C. Rafalimanana, R. Rakotomalala, Arinomenjanahary Rakotoarisoa, Lalatiana Valisoa Andriambelo, Hoby Tantelinirimiarana, Jocia Fenomanana, Irène Rakotoniaina, Z. Ravaoarisaina, A. C. Razafindrakoto, Tsiriniaina Ramavoson, Eddy Ramaminiaina, Heritiana Randrianary, Andry Tiana Razafinikasa, Jean Emile Ravelomandranto, A. L. Rakotovao
{"title":"Bis NEG-D与API 20E在马达加斯加塔那那利佛贝费拉塔纳纳大学医院实验室鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的比较","authors":"Z. Rakotovao-Ravahatra, L. Rahajamanana, L. Rakotondraoelina, L. Raskine, S. Rasoanandrasana, C. Rafalimanana, R. Rakotomalala, Arinomenjanahary Rakotoarisoa, Lalatiana Valisoa Andriambelo, Hoby Tantelinirimiarana, Jocia Fenomanana, Irène Rakotoniaina, Z. Ravaoarisaina, A. C. Razafindrakoto, Tsiriniaina Ramavoson, Eddy Ramaminiaina, Heritiana Randrianary, Andry Tiana Razafinikasa, Jean Emile Ravelomandranto, A. L. Rakotovao","doi":"10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.5.286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In medical analysis laboratories, techniques for identifying bacteria are currently becoming more and more numerous. The objective of this study is to compare the 2 bacterial identification systems Bis NEG-D and Api 20E for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. This is a qualitative evaluation of the Bis NEG-D compared to the gold standard Api 20E. During the study period, 32 Gram-negative bacilli isolates were identified simultaneously using Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. The samples are represented by 12 (37.5%) blood samples for blood culture, 12 (37.5%) urine samples for cytobacteriological examination of the urine, 06 (18.8%) pus samples for bacteriological examination of pus, a sample of the cerebrospinal fluid (3.1%) and a vaginal sample (3.1%).The bacteria identified were represented by Enterobacter spp, Escherichia col,i Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella spp, Salmonella typhi, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas spp, Proteus mirabilis, Raoultella ornithinolytica and Bukholderia cepacia. This study showed a concordance of 90.6% (29/32) and a discordance of 9.4% (3/32) between the results of Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. Concerning the probability scores, they vary between 95% to 100% for Api 20E and between 79.3% to 100% for Bis NEG-D. This study also compared the pros and cons of using Api 20 E and Bis NEG-D. The Bis-NEG-D is valid and can be used by medical analysis laboratories like the Api 20E, especially if these laboratories do not need to perform a lot of bacterial identification tests.","PeriodicalId":72969,"journal":{"name":"European journal of biology and biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Bis NEG-D and API 20E for the Identification of Gram-negative Bacilli in the Laboratory of the University Hospital of Befelatanana Antananarivo Madagascar\",\"authors\":\"Z. Rakotovao-Ravahatra, L. Rahajamanana, L. Rakotondraoelina, L. Raskine, S. Rasoanandrasana, C. Rafalimanana, R. Rakotomalala, Arinomenjanahary Rakotoarisoa, Lalatiana Valisoa Andriambelo, Hoby Tantelinirimiarana, Jocia Fenomanana, Irène Rakotoniaina, Z. Ravaoarisaina, A. C. Razafindrakoto, Tsiriniaina Ramavoson, Eddy Ramaminiaina, Heritiana Randrianary, Andry Tiana Razafinikasa, Jean Emile Ravelomandranto, A. L. Rakotovao\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.5.286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In medical analysis laboratories, techniques for identifying bacteria are currently becoming more and more numerous. The objective of this study is to compare the 2 bacterial identification systems Bis NEG-D and Api 20E for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. This is a qualitative evaluation of the Bis NEG-D compared to the gold standard Api 20E. During the study period, 32 Gram-negative bacilli isolates were identified simultaneously using Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. The samples are represented by 12 (37.5%) blood samples for blood culture, 12 (37.5%) urine samples for cytobacteriological examination of the urine, 06 (18.8%) pus samples for bacteriological examination of pus, a sample of the cerebrospinal fluid (3.1%) and a vaginal sample (3.1%).The bacteria identified were represented by Enterobacter spp, Escherichia col,i Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella spp, Salmonella typhi, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas spp, Proteus mirabilis, Raoultella ornithinolytica and Bukholderia cepacia. This study showed a concordance of 90.6% (29/32) and a discordance of 9.4% (3/32) between the results of Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. Concerning the probability scores, they vary between 95% to 100% for Api 20E and between 79.3% to 100% for Bis NEG-D. This study also compared the pros and cons of using Api 20 E and Bis NEG-D. The Bis-NEG-D is valid and can be used by medical analysis laboratories like the Api 20E, especially if these laboratories do not need to perform a lot of bacterial identification tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of biology and biotechnology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of biology and biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.5.286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of biology and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.5.286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医学分析实验室中,鉴定细菌的技术目前越来越多。本研究的目的是比较两种细菌鉴定系统Bis NEG-D和Api 20E对革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定。这是Bis NEG-D与金标准Api 20E相比的定性评估。在研究期间,使用Api 20E和Bis NEG-D同时鉴定了32株革兰氏阴性杆菌。这些样本包括12份(37.5%)血液样本用于血液培养,12份(375%)尿液样本用于尿液的细胞细菌学检查,06份(18.8%)脓液样本用于脓液的细菌学检查,一份脑脊液样本(3.1%)和一份阴道样品(3.1%),伤寒沙门氏菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、假单胞菌、奇异变形杆菌、鸟粪拉乌尔氏菌和洋葱Bukholderia cepacia。本研究显示Api 20E和Bis NEG-D的结果一致性为90.6%(29/32),不一致性为9.4%(3/32)。关于概率得分,Api 20E的概率得分在95%至100%之间,Bis NEG-D的概率得分为79.3%至100%。本研究还比较了使用Api 20E和Bis NEG-D的优缺点。Bis-NEG-D是有效的,可以被Api 20E等医学分析实验室使用,特别是如果这些实验室不需要进行大量的细菌鉴定测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Bis NEG-D and API 20E for the Identification of Gram-negative Bacilli in the Laboratory of the University Hospital of Befelatanana Antananarivo Madagascar
In medical analysis laboratories, techniques for identifying bacteria are currently becoming more and more numerous. The objective of this study is to compare the 2 bacterial identification systems Bis NEG-D and Api 20E for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. This is a qualitative evaluation of the Bis NEG-D compared to the gold standard Api 20E. During the study period, 32 Gram-negative bacilli isolates were identified simultaneously using Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. The samples are represented by 12 (37.5%) blood samples for blood culture, 12 (37.5%) urine samples for cytobacteriological examination of the urine, 06 (18.8%) pus samples for bacteriological examination of pus, a sample of the cerebrospinal fluid (3.1%) and a vaginal sample (3.1%).The bacteria identified were represented by Enterobacter spp, Escherichia col,i Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella spp, Salmonella typhi, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas spp, Proteus mirabilis, Raoultella ornithinolytica and Bukholderia cepacia. This study showed a concordance of 90.6% (29/32) and a discordance of 9.4% (3/32) between the results of Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. Concerning the probability scores, they vary between 95% to 100% for Api 20E and between 79.3% to 100% for Bis NEG-D. This study also compared the pros and cons of using Api 20 E and Bis NEG-D. The Bis-NEG-D is valid and can be used by medical analysis laboratories like the Api 20E, especially if these laboratories do not need to perform a lot of bacterial identification tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Jatropha curcas Accessions Control of Photoinhibition and Photoprotective Mechanisms in Senescing Leaves in a Semi-Arid Region Botswana Point-of-Care Molecular Testing with tinto rangTM: A Food Grade Safe Fluorophore for Colorimetric LAMP Assays at Low Resource Settings New Species of Preussia from Sedimentary Cost in Basrah Province, Iraq Sexual Dimorphism of Elastic Fibers in Prenatal Lung Mice Microbial Biotechnology: A Key Tool for Addressing Climate Change and Food Insecurity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1