笔迹的视觉组织

Q3 Social Sciences Information Design Journal Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad
Renata Cadena, Solange Coutinho
{"title":"笔迹的视觉组织","authors":"Renata Cadena, Solange Coutinho","doi":"10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study focuses on a comparison between the writing of Brazilian teachers and students, especially the visual organization of handwriting during the third year of primary school. Data was collected from observing eight different classes for 10 school days each. The analytical corpus was mainly composed of handwritten activities and graphical variations to the writing called textual graphic tools, which were classified within a framework based on the fields of graphic and rhetoric communication. The results compared the teacher and student graphical solutions for informational tasks, and while students reproduced the teachers’ visual strategies, especially the manipulation of space, they also possessed their own practices, where they displayed several creative means to sequence listed items.","PeriodicalId":35109,"journal":{"name":"Information Design Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"157-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The visual organization of handwriting\",\"authors\":\"Renata Cadena, Solange Coutinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study focuses on a comparison between the writing of Brazilian teachers and students, especially the visual organization of handwriting during the third year of primary school. Data was collected from observing eight different classes for 10 school days each. The analytical corpus was mainly composed of handwritten activities and graphical variations to the writing called textual graphic tools, which were classified within a framework based on the fields of graphic and rhetoric communication. The results compared the teacher and student graphical solutions for informational tasks, and while students reproduced the teachers’ visual strategies, especially the manipulation of space, they also possessed their own practices, where they displayed several creative means to sequence listed items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"157-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.2.02cad","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究重点比较了巴西教师和学生在小学三年级的书写,尤其是书写的视觉组织。数据是通过观察八个不同的班级,每个班级10个学习日收集的。分析语料库主要由手写活动和写作的图形变体组成,称为文本图形工具,这些工具在基于图形和修辞交流领域的框架内进行分类。结果比较了教师和学生对信息任务的图形解决方案,当学生再现教师的视觉策略,特别是对空间的操纵时,他们也有自己的实践,在这些实践中,他们展示了几种创造性的方法来排列所列项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The visual organization of handwriting
Abstract This study focuses on a comparison between the writing of Brazilian teachers and students, especially the visual organization of handwriting during the third year of primary school. Data was collected from observing eight different classes for 10 school days each. The analytical corpus was mainly composed of handwritten activities and graphical variations to the writing called textual graphic tools, which were classified within a framework based on the fields of graphic and rhetoric communication. The results compared the teacher and student graphical solutions for informational tasks, and while students reproduced the teachers’ visual strategies, especially the manipulation of space, they also possessed their own practices, where they displayed several creative means to sequence listed items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Design Journal
Information Design Journal Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Information Design Journal (IDJ) is a peer reviewed international journal that bridges the gap between research and practice in information design. IDJ is a platform for discussing and improving the design, usability, and overall effectiveness of ‘content put into form’ — of verbal and visual messages shaped to meet the needs of particular audiences. IDJ offers a forum for sharing ideas about the verbal, visual, and typographic design of print and online documents, multimedia presentations, illustrations, signage, interfaces, maps, quantitative displays, websites, and new media. IDJ brings together ways of thinking about creating effective communications for use in contexts such as workplaces, hospitals, airports, banks, schools, or government agencies.
期刊最新文献
Social commitment and challenges of information design Script-style degrees Review of Pontis & Babwahsingh (2023): Information Design Unbound: Key Concepts and Skills for Making Sense in a Changing World Visual instructions for writing Chinese for beginners Testing the effectiveness of a supportive digital information tool for patients recovering from bowel surgery, their surgeons and nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1