衡量社会政策评估中的幸福:多维幸福指数

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Spectrum Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02732173.2022.2163444
Gabriela Delsignore, A. Aguilar-Latorre, Pablo Garcia-Ruiz, B. Oliván-Blázquez
{"title":"衡量社会政策评估中的幸福:多维幸福指数","authors":"Gabriela Delsignore, A. Aguilar-Latorre, Pablo Garcia-Ruiz, B. Oliván-Blázquez","doi":"10.1080/02732173.2022.2163444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are multiple indices based on positive psychology and the economics of happiness for measuring, evaluating and developing social policies. Based on univariable scales, they reflect a more hedonic view rather than a complex perspective on social reality and human behavior, which renders them unfit for purpose in the field of sociology. This paper proposes a multidimensional model that includes social relationships and human happiness, focusing more on eudaimonic than hedonic happiness. It contains an affective dimension, an ethical dimension, and a welfare system’s evaluation dimension. Based on the sociology of emotions, it includes elements from Shalom Schwartz’s theory of values and Jacques Thomassen’s study of societies with consolidated political and welfare systems. The model was validated using an Exploratory Factor Analysis with 28 variables from the European Social Survey (ESS). A multidimensional index is proposed, composed of five factors: the welfare system, positive and negative emotional states, altruism, and egocentrism.","PeriodicalId":47106,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Spectrum","volume":"43 1","pages":"16 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring happiness for social policy evaluation: a multidimensional index of happiness\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Delsignore, A. Aguilar-Latorre, Pablo Garcia-Ruiz, B. Oliván-Blázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02732173.2022.2163444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There are multiple indices based on positive psychology and the economics of happiness for measuring, evaluating and developing social policies. Based on univariable scales, they reflect a more hedonic view rather than a complex perspective on social reality and human behavior, which renders them unfit for purpose in the field of sociology. This paper proposes a multidimensional model that includes social relationships and human happiness, focusing more on eudaimonic than hedonic happiness. It contains an affective dimension, an ethical dimension, and a welfare system’s evaluation dimension. Based on the sociology of emotions, it includes elements from Shalom Schwartz’s theory of values and Jacques Thomassen’s study of societies with consolidated political and welfare systems. The model was validated using an Exploratory Factor Analysis with 28 variables from the European Social Survey (ESS). A multidimensional index is proposed, composed of five factors: the welfare system, positive and negative emotional states, altruism, and egocentrism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Spectrum\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2022.2163444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2022.2163444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要基于积极心理学和幸福经济学,有多种指标可用于衡量、评估和制定社会政策。基于单变量量表,它们反映了一种更为享乐的观点,而不是对社会现实和人类行为的复杂视角,这使它们不适合社会学领域的目的。本文提出了一个包含社会关系和人类幸福的多维模型,更多地关注幸福而非享乐幸福。它包含情感维度、伦理维度和福利体系的评价维度。它以情感社会学为基础,包含了沙洛姆·施瓦茨的价值观理论和雅克·托马森对政治和福利制度巩固的社会的研究。该模型使用探索性因素分析对来自欧洲社会调查(ESS)的28个变量进行了验证。提出了一个多维指标,由五个因素组成:福利制度、积极和消极的情绪状态、利他主义和自我中心主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring happiness for social policy evaluation: a multidimensional index of happiness
Abstract There are multiple indices based on positive psychology and the economics of happiness for measuring, evaluating and developing social policies. Based on univariable scales, they reflect a more hedonic view rather than a complex perspective on social reality and human behavior, which renders them unfit for purpose in the field of sociology. This paper proposes a multidimensional model that includes social relationships and human happiness, focusing more on eudaimonic than hedonic happiness. It contains an affective dimension, an ethical dimension, and a welfare system’s evaluation dimension. Based on the sociology of emotions, it includes elements from Shalom Schwartz’s theory of values and Jacques Thomassen’s study of societies with consolidated political and welfare systems. The model was validated using an Exploratory Factor Analysis with 28 variables from the European Social Survey (ESS). A multidimensional index is proposed, composed of five factors: the welfare system, positive and negative emotional states, altruism, and egocentrism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Sociological Spectrum publishes papers on theoretical, methodological, quantitative and qualitative research, and applied research in areas of sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Department of Error. Social class and informal caregiving for family members with Alzheimer’s disease: the role of economic capital, cultural health capital, and social capital Between biological age and social age: age of marriage and first birth among Arab-Palestinian women in Israel The good, the bad, and the profane: Durkheim and the “strong program” in cultural sociology Why some states bring more laws to the gunfight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1